No abstract

Solutions of hetastarch produce significant abnormalities of some hemostasis laboratory results when infused at clinically relevant doses, but it is unlikely that the modest hemostatic abnormalities produced at these doses per se would lead to clinical bleeding. Hetastarch causes greater hemostatic abnormalities than pentastarch, and because both HES solutions have comparable plasma volume-expanding effects, it is reasonable to prefer pentastarch as a plasma volume expander.

In surgical patients with dilutional coagulopathy, diagnostic and treatment decisions could depend on which PT and APTT test was used to determine the etiology of increased bleeding. This study indicates that the relationship between increased bleeding and an increased PT and APTT may be more difficult to define than is suggested by current practice guidelines. Each laboratory must establish guidelines based on reagent and instrument sensitivity to coagulation factor dilution.

The purpose of this study was: 1) to define coagulation abnormalities in patients who receive red cell concentrates rather than whole blood for large volume blood loss (greater than 0.5 blood volume); and 2) to determine when coagulation abnormalities lead to increased bleeding in the massively transfused surgical patient. We studied 32 ASA physical status I or II patients (mean age 15.6 +/- 2.3 yr) who lost more than 50% of their blood volume during elective posterior spinal stabilization. Crystalloid solutions and packed red cell concentrates were used to replace blood and fluid losses. Invasive hemodynamic measures, urinary output, and serial hematocrit determinations were used to help maintain a constant intravascular volume and confirm the estimates of blood loss. The quality of hemostasis was assessed during operation. In 15 of the 32 patients, surgical hemostasis remained effective throughout posterior spinal fusion. A coagulation profile (prothrombin time [PT] and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], platelet count, and fibrinogen) was measured at the conclusion of operation in these patients. In 17 patients, increased surgical bleeding as a result of decreased clot formation and increased bleeding from the wound was present. In these 17 patients at the time increased bleeding was diagnosed, hemostatic tests (PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, platelet count, and coagulation factor assays V, VIII, and IX) were obtained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We have studied 219 353 individual clinical chemistry results obtained in methods comparison studies. Each result was prospectively compared with its replicate, comparative, or repeat value to identify differences from expected values. Unacceptable results were defined as differing from the expected values by ≤7 SDs or CVs. We believe these differences represent special-cause variation and should be expressed as unacceptable rates per million results (ppm). We observed 447 ppm unacceptables: 196 ppm in control samples and 251 ppm in patients’ samples. Results judged likely to alter patient care occurred at a rate of 41 ppm. To better understand the magnitude of these rates, we compared these results with reports of error rates in HIV testing and the airline industry. The measurements reported were made for the purpose of quality improvement, not judgment or discovery. The significance of these findings for laboratorians, manufacturers, and regulators is discussed.

Some thromboplastin manufacturers are currently supplying the instrument-specific international sensitivity index (ISI) values of their reagents, allowing clinical laboratories to calculate instrument-specific international normalized ratio (INR) values on plasma samples from patients receiving coumarin therapy. However, the assumption that systematic interinstrument variability in the INR would be eliminated if manufacturer-determined ISI values were used remains unsubstantiated. This assumption was evaluated by comparing INR values obtained on one instrument that measures a mechanical endpoint (fibrometer) with one that measures a photo-optical endpoint (MLA-700). Three thromboplastin reagents with instrument-specific ISI values supplied by the manufacturer (ISI range, 1.23-2.79) were used. For two of three reagents, the fibrometer INR values were significantly higher than the MLA-700 INR values (P < .01). Analysis of log prothrombin time ratio plots showed that this systematic variability was caused by inaccurate manufacturer ISI values. Of clinical significance is that the inaccurate ISI values produced a high number of discordant INR values between these two instruments (> 47% of plasma samples had one INR value within and one out of the recommended therapeutic range). The implication of these findings for laboratory monitoring of oral anticoagulation is discussed.

No abstract

No abstract