The incidence, time course and nature of systemic reactions to injections of bee and wasp venom during immunotherapy have been estimated in an open, prospective, single centre study. One hundred and nine survivors of moderate to severe systemic reactions to stings from hymenoptera, received courses of bee or wasp venom by monthly subcutaneous injection for up to 3 years. Systemic reactions were recorded after 7.5% of 946 weekly venom injections during the initial phase of treatment, and after 2.1% of 1789 monthly maintenance injections. In both phases of treatment, reactions were more frequent after bee (17% of initial phase, 7.8% of maintenance treatment) than after wasp (3% of initial phase, 0.3% of maintenance treatment) venom injections. The percentage of patients experiencing at least one reaction was also higher for bee (46%) than for wasp (14%) sensitive patients. Over 80% of reactions began within 30 min of injection, over 90% within 1 h and only two (2%), between 1 and 2 h, the remaining six (5.5%) starting more than 2 h after injection. Only 0.47% of venom injections produced a systemic reaction which was severe enough to require adrenaline treatment. The female patients experienced more reactions (21% of the wasp, 60% of the bee, sensitive) than the males (5.5% wasp, 20% bee). Age and atopy did not appear to be significant risk factors for systemic reactions. We conclude that wasp and bee venom immunotherapy in a conventional dosage regimen was generally well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

No abstract

We have examined whether the lack of clinical response to corticosteroids seen in corticosteroid resistant (CR) bronchial asthma is reflected in abnormalities of endogenous cortisol secretion and in the sensitivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in CR subjects by using a modification of the standard dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in response to 0.25 and 1 mg oral dexamethasone. Five corticosteroid-sensitive (CS) and five CR asthmatic subjects were studied on two occasions 1 mo apart. In the first limb of the study subjects received 0.25 mg of oral dexamethasone, and in the second limb they received 1 mg. Urinary cortisol was measured by fluorimetry after extraction, and plasma cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentrations were estimated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoradiometric assays, respectively. On Day 1, a 24-h urine sample was collected for estimation of urinary free cortisol. On Day 2, a fasting blood sample was taken at 9:00 A.M. for estimation of plasma cortisol and ACTH. At 11:00 P.M., 0.25 mg (1 mg) of dexamethasone was taken orally by each subject. On Day 3, blood was taken at 9:00 A.M. and 3:00 P.M. for similar estimations. The levels of urinary free cortisol (nmol/24 h) and predose plasma ACTH (ng/L) and cortisol (nmol/L) were 199 +/- 42, 27.4 +/- 5.7, and 300 +/- 48 (mean +/- SEM), respectively, in the CS group, and 210 +/- 74, 23.4 +/- 6.7, and 263 +/- 32 (mean +/- SEM), respectively, in the CR group (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Plasma ACTH and cortisol concentrations were not significantly suppressed in either group after 0.25 mg dexamethasone, but were equally suppressed in both groups to undetectable levels by 1 mg dexamethasone. We conclude that CR asthma is not reflected in an altered secretory rate of endogenous cortisol or in an altered sensitivity of the HPA axis to dexamethasone suppression.

No abstract

No abstract

Eosinophils play a critical role in late-phase reaction allergic inflammatory responses, although the factors responsible for selective tissue eosinophilia are currently ill-defined. To determine whether recruitment of eosinophils is allergen-specific, or a feature of inflammation in allergic individuals, we have examined cutaneous cell infiltrates and endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression in atopic subjects 6 h (n = 8) and 24 h (n = 7) following ultraviolet-B (UVB) irradiation, or intradermal injection of late-phase reaction allergens or diluent control, using standard immunohistochemical techniques. The numbers of eosinophils were increased significantly, when compared to controls, at both 6 h (P < 0.01) and 24 h (P < 0.05), following intradermal allergen challenge, whereas no significant increase in eosinophils was observed following UVB irradiation. UVB and allergen both induced significant increases in neutrophils, monocytes and T cells at 24 h compared to control sites. An increased expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules, E-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), was observed in both models of inflammation. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) was induced weakly on some biopsies following allergen, and not at all following UVB. These data indicate that eosinophil infiltration in susceptible individuals is a specific property of allergen. Although this study would support the postulated role of VCAM-1 in selective eosinophil recruitment, given its variable and weak expression, additional factors are likely to be involved.

No abstract