Extracorporeal life support is a worldwide expanding technology for patients in critical cardiogenic shock. The device is usually attached to the femoral vessels using percutaneous techniques. Despite sufficient extracorporeal circulatory support, an unclear number of patients develop high end-diastolic pressures leading to left ventricular distension and pulmonary edema, and ventricular thrombus formation may evolve. This article discusses the strategies to prevent ventricular distension by conservative, interventional, and surgical means, also illustrated by case presentations.
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) conventionally requires the cannulation of two vessels. Here we report our initial experience with the "Wang-Zwische" (WZ) double-lumen cannula. In a group of n = 36 patients single venous cannulation for vvECMO was performed. A retrospective analysis was executed. A comparison of flow characteristics to standard two-vessel cannulation was performed. Mean age of the patient population was 48 ± 15 years (body mass index [BMI] 32 ± 13 kg/m(2)). In n = 32 patients (89%) the cannula was implanted percutaneously under echo or fluoroscopic guidance in less than 30 minutes. Nine patients were partially mobilized on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Oxygenation (partial arterial oxygen tension [PaO(2)]/fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO(2)]) improved significantly in all patients from 66 mm Hg (interquartile range [IQR] 58-87 mm Hg) before ECMO to 117 mm Hg (IQR 95-195 mm Hg, p = 0.001) after 24 hours. In seven patients (19%) nonfatal adverse events occurred, including three dislocations, two partial cannula thrombosis, one ventricular perforation, and one retroperitoneal hemorrhage. The negative pressures for drainage at a flow of 2.5 L/min were significantly lower in a standard (S) two-vessel approach compared with a WZ approach (S: -9 mm Hg; IQR -3 to -24 mm Hg, vs. WZ: -23 mm Hg; IQR -4 to -40 mm Hg; p = 0.04). The WZ cannula offers sufficient gas exchange in addition to certain advantages over standard cannulation, including facilitated cannulation in selected patients and improved mobilization.
Background The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate our experience with the surgical pericardiectomy procedure for patients suffering from isolated severe constrictive pericarditis.
Methods From 1995 to 2016, 39 patients underwent isolated pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Fifteen patients were excluded because of concomitant surgery. There were 31 male (79.5%) patients and 8 female (20.5%) patients, 28 to 76 years old (mean, 56.6 ± 13.6 years). The underlying etiologies were idiopathic pericarditis (74.5%), infection (10%), rheumatic disorders (8%), status post cardiac surgery (2.5%), tuberculosis (2.5%), and status post mediastinal irradiation (2.5%).
Results Pericardiectomy was performed through midline sternotomy in all cases. Sixteen patients (41%) underwent pericardiectomy electively employing cardiopulmonary bypass with the heart beating, and 23 patients (59%) had surgery without extracorporeal circulation (ECC). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 50% if cardiopulmonary bypass was used (13.8% since 2007). If surgery was performed without a heart–lung machine, mortality was 0%. On-pump patients had a significantly longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (12 ± 9 vs. 4 ± 4 days, p = 0.013). Likewise, the duration of mechanical ventilation was much longer (171 ± 246 vs. 21 ± 40 hours, p = 0.04). The hospital stay was comparable with 28 ± 10 and 24 ± 18 days (p = 0.21).
Conclusion The present study demonstrates that pericardiectomy, without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass as treatment for constrictive pericarditis, is a safe procedure with an excellent outcome in critically ill patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.