Blinatumomab has unique pharmacokinetic and immunological features that require indication-dependent dosing regimens. Stepped dosing is required to achieve adequate efficacy and minimize cytokine release in diseases with high tumor burden.

No abstract

Blinatumomab is a CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct for treatment of leukemia. Transient elevation of cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)) has been observed within the first 48 hours of continuous intravenous blinatumomab infusion. In human hepatocytes, blinatumomab showed no effect on cytochrome P450 (CYP450) activities, whereas a cytokine cocktail showed suppression of CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and CYP2C9 activities. We developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to evaluate the effect of transient elevation of cytokines, particularly IL-6, on CYP450 suppression. The predicted suppression of hepatic CYP450 activities was <30%, and IL-6–mediated changes in exposure to sensitive substrates of CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and CYP2C9 were

PurposeTo determine the exposure–response (ER) relationships between atezolizumab exposure and efficacy or safety in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or urothelial carcinoma (UC) and to identify alternative dosing regimens.MethodsER analyses were conducted using pooled NSCLC and UC data from phase 1 and 3 studies (PCD4989g, OAK, IMvigor211; ClinicalTrials.gov IDs, NCT01375842, NCT02008227, and NCT02302807, respectively). Objective response rate, overall survival, and adverse events were evaluated vs pharmacokinetic (PK) metrics. Population PK-simulated exposures for regimens of 840 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) and 1680 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) were compared with the approved regimen of 1200 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) and the maximum assessed dose (MAD; 20 mg/kg q3w). Phase 3 IMpassion130 (NCT02425891) data were used to validate the PK simulations for 840 mg q2w. Observed safety data were evaluated by exposure and body weight subgroups.ResultsNo significant ER relationships were observed for safety or efficacy. Predicted exposures for 840 mg q2w and 1680 mg q4w were comparable to 1200 mg q3w and the MAD and consistent with observed PK data from IMpassion130. Observed safety was similar between patients with a Cmax above and below the predicted Cmax for 1680 mg q4w and between patients in the lowest and upper 3 body weight quartiles.ConclusionAtezolizumab regimens of 840 mg q2w and 1680 mg q4w are expected to have comparable efficacy and safety as the approved regimen of 1200 mg q3w, supporting their interchangeable use and offering patients greater flexibility.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-019-03954-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

We characterized the association between tumor size kinetics and survival in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab (anti‐programmed death‐ligand 1, Tecentriq) using a joint model. The model, developed on data from 309 patients of a phase II clinical trial, identified the time‐to‐tumor growth and the instantaneous changes in tumor size as the best on‐treatment predictors of survival. On the validation dataset containing data from 457 patients from a phase III study, the model predicted individual survival probability using 3‐month or 6‐month tumor size follow‐up data with an area under the receptor‐occupancy curve between 0.75 and 0.84, as compared with values comprised between 0.62 and 0.75 when the model included only information available at treatment initiation. Including tumor size kinetics in a relevant statistical framework improves the prediction of survival probability during immunotherapy treatment and may be useful to identify most‐at‐risk patients in “real‐time.”