Compressing the surface of sawn timber results in a substantial increase in hardness, and this opens up new market opportunities of using low-density timber species as the raw material for high-value wood products. Unfortunately, widespread commercialisation is hindered by the lack of an industrially viable surface densification process, the major obstacle being the set-recovery (SR) of the densified wood cells upon exposure to moisture. Our hypothesis is that partial dissolution of the crystalline cellulose during densification will largely prevent the SR of densified wood. We therefore evaluated the effect of ionic liquid (IL) or organic superbase pre-treatment on the elastic spring-back (SB), SR and Brinell hardness (HB) of surface-densified wood. Specimens of Scots pine were treated with solutions of ILs or superbases, and then densified in a hot press at temperatures between 200°C and 270°C. The SR was reduced from 90% for the control group to only about 10% for the treated materials. The treated and densified specimens exhibited a higher HB than their untreated and densified counterparts. The method presented in this study is a precursor to the development of a continuous densification process adapted for an open system. Further studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the pre-treatment.
The hardness of the outer regions of solid wood can be improved by surface densification, and this opens up new fields of application for low-density species. So far, surface densification relies on time-and energy-consuming batch processes, and this means that the potential advantages over more expensive hardwood species or non-renewable materials are reduced. Using fossil-based plastics or applying wood densification processes with a high energy consumption has adverse effects on the environment. In a previous study, it was shown that the surface of wood can be densified by a continuous high-speed process, adopting a roller pressing approach. The desired density profiles could be obtained at process speeds of up to 80 m min -1 , but an equally simple and fast method to eliminate the moisture-induced set-recovery of the densified wood cells is still required. For this reason, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the effect on the set-recovery and hardness of surface-densified Scots pine after a fast pre-treatment with solutions of sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, methacrylate resin, and ionic liquids. The Scots pine specimens were pre-treated by applying the chemical treatment and impregnation agents to the wood surface with a paper towel, before the specimens were densified. For each type of treatment, 15 specimens were densified in a hot press. The set-recovery was measured after two wet-dry cycles, and 30 Brinell hardness measurements were carried out on each group of specimens. In general, the effect of the treatments on the set-recovery was rather low. Ionic liquid solutions appear to work as a strong plasticiser and the treatment led to a reduction in set-recovery by 25%. The treatments with sodium silicate, ionic liquids and methacrylate resin led to a greater hardness than in untreated and densified specimens. Further experiments are needed to improve the depth of penetration of the treatment solutions into the wood surface, as this was identified as one of the main causes of the rather weak effects.
The established methods for testing the hardness of wood are of questionable value for assessing the performance of surface-densified wood, since the density profile beneath the densified surface is an important property that needs to be considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the density profile of surface-densified wood and the hardness test parameters, such as indenter geometry and applied load on the measured hardness. The influence of the density profile varied considerably depending on the hardness test parameters. This can make a comparison of hardness values of surface-densified wood prone to misinterpretation. The selection of hardness test parameters should either be product-specific, or the density profile itself should be used to evaluate the hardness of surface-densified wood. A strong influence of the density profile on the indentation depth development during the hardness tests indicates the possibility of predicting the density profile based on the hardness test methods.
The moisture-induced recovery of compressed wood is one of the major problems of wood densification technology. Achieving a cost-efficient surface densification process without the need for additional resins to eliminate the set-recovery may lead to an increase in value of low-density wood species. A previous study has shown that a pre-treatment with ionic liquids (ILs) can nearly eliminate the set-recovery. It was however observed that during the pre-treatment process the IL did not penetrate sufficiently deep into the wood to explain the achieved reduction in set-recovery. Based on these findings, the hypothesis was posed that further penetration of the IL into the wood occurs during the densification stage as a consequence of the applied heat and pressure. Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and gas-chromatography mass-selective-detection (GC-MSD) showed that the depth of penetration of the IL was greater after the densification process than before. Digital image correlation (DIC) showed that in regions with a high IL concentration, there was almost no set-recovery, and it gradually increased with a decrease in the IL concentration, as observed with TGA and GC-MSD analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.