Lung cancer is the most common and fatal malignant tumour worldwide with a five‐year overall survival rate of only 15%. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a heterogeneous disease. The use of microarray datasets along with bioinformatics knowledge might help to clarify the expression profile of cancer, molecular markers for the initial screening of tumour and the underlying biological mechanisms. The present study is designed to identify differential expression genes and molecular mechanisms of LUAD compared to normal lung tissues using systems biology approaches.Methods Four GSE datasets (GSE75037, GSE63459, GSE32863 and GSE10072) were selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Data processing and meta-analysis were performed using the R statistical programming language, The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with each stage were obtained. The common and unique DEGs between stages of LUAD and adjacent normal lung tissues were initiated by Venny tool. Common genes, including upregulated and downregulated genes, were then analyzed to a STRING database to obtain protein-protein interaction (PPI). STRING output was analyzed by MCODE and CytoHubba applications of Cytoscape to identify modules of co-expression and hub genes, respectively.Results The shared upregulated and downregulated DEGs among LUAD stages were 22 and 140 genes, respectively, when compared to normal lung tissues. Unique genes for each stage were also identified. The hub genes were PECAM1, TEK, CDH5, VWF and ANGPT1. Most of the top cluster genes were enriched for Gα(s) signalling events, GPCR ligand binding, class B/2 (Secretin family receptors), platelet activation, signalling and aggregation in the main three co-expression clusters. Most of the shared genes (16 genes) were enriched in the metabolic pathway of hemostasis. Meaningful signaling pathways for unique genes were found at each stage.Conclusions In the present study main three co-expression clusters, metabolic pathways and biological processes were identified to understand mechanisms underlying LUAD pathogenesis, development and progression at different stages. Unique upregulated and downregulated DEGs at each stage were identified with FERMT1 and SIX1 as specific early-stage diagnostic biomarkers for stage IB and IIB. 5 hub genes were observed, including PECAM1, TEK, CDH5, vWF and ANGPT1 which might be crucial for the onset and progression of LUAD.
Background and Objective: Prostate cancer is among the five common cancers in males. It is second cancer in terms of the age-standardized rate (ASR) (ASR=16.6) in Iran. The rs2735839 G/A, an intergenic polymorphism is located on chromosome 19q13.33 at 600 base pairs of the KLK3 gene untranslatable region. This gene which codes prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is used in the screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between this polymorphism and prostate adenocarcinoma with PSA. Materials and Methods: This case-control study included 103 and 100 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as case and control groups, respectively. Tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction was used to determine the genotype of each participant regarding rs2735839 polymorphism. Results: There was a significant difference between the adenocarcinoma prostate and BPH groups regarding genotype frequency AG+AA (OR [95% CI]=4.991 [2.475-10.065], P=0.00). According to the results of statistical analysis, a significant difference was observed between the adenocarcinoma and BPH groups in terms of allele frequency (OR [95% CI]=3.927 [2.085-7.397], P=0.00). Moreover, There was a significant difference between rs2735839 and PSA regarding the genotype frequency polymorphism (P=0.011). Conclusion:The results indicate that rs2735839 is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer in Iranian population. It is worth noting that a significant difference was found between the distribution of allele A and that of allele G with PSA levels of >10.
Background: Prostate cancer is one of the five common cancers and has the second incidence rate and the third mortality rate in Iranian population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of rs16901979, rs4242382 and rs1447295 on 8q24 locus, rs2735839 (KLK3 gene) and rs721048 (EHBP1 gene) with prostate adenocarcinoma through multi-stage approach to identify the polymorphisms associated with prostate cancer and use them as screening factors. Screening tests can identify people who may have a chance of developing the disease before detection and any symptoms. Methods: The case-control study included 103 cases (prostate adenocarcinoma) and 100 controls (benign prostatic hyperplasia). Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR was used to genotyping of each participant. A Multi-stage approach was used for efficient genomic study. In this method, a smaller number of people can be used. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used to investigate the SNPs associated with prostate cancer and Gleason score. Results: In the first stage (59 men), the frequency of polymorphisms rs16901979, rs4242382, rs1447295, rs2735839 and rs721048 in the prostate adenocarcinoma group was evaluated compared to the control group (P-value < 0.3) in order to select meaningful polymorphisms. There was not any significant difference between genotype frequency rs16901979 (P = 0.671) and rs721048 (P = 0.474) in the case group compared to BPH. Therefore, these polymorphisms were eliminated, and in the second step (144 men), rs4242382, rs2735839 and rs1447295 were evaluated (P-value < 0.05). According to the total population (203 men), there was significant difference between genotype frequency rs4242382 (P = 0.001), rs2735839 (P = 0.000) and rs1447295 (P = 0.005) even after using Bonferroni correction (p = 0.016). The effect of these three polymorphisms on prostate cancer was not modified by age and PSA. There was a significant difference between the allelic frequency of A vs G (rs4242382, rs2735839) at all classes of Gleason score and A vs C (rs1447295) at Gleason score ≥ 8.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.