BackgroundIn recent years, there has been growing interest in the impact of gender-related factors on the function and structure of the arterial tree. The aim of our study was to identify gender-specific differences in the progression of carotid stiffness parameters with age and in the impact of risk factors on carotid stiffness.Subjects and methodsThe study group included 256 subjects (mean age: 54.7 years): 134 women (52%) and 122 men (48%) with cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, and obesity. Local parameters of carotid stiffness: β stiffness index (β), Peterson’s elastic modulus (Ep), pulse wave velocity β (PWV-β) and arterial compliance (AC) were determined with ultrasound echo-tracking software application.ResultsWomen were characterized by lower AC than men (women: 0.57 mm2/kPa vs men: 0.69 mm2/kPa, p < 0.001) and the subanalysis in three age groups revealed that the difference in AC value between genders became significant over the age of 45 years. Although no significant difference in the value of β, Ep and PWV-β were found between genders in the whole study group, women <45 years were characterized by lower values of β and Ep than their men counterparts (β: women: 5.4 vs men: 6.6, p = 0.002; Ep: women: 72 kPa vs men: 84 kPa, p = 0.015). Among analyzed risk factors, the significant determinants of carotid stiffness were age, blood pressure components (pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart rate. The relationship between carotid stiffness and pulse pressure was observed only in women and between carotid stiffness and heart rate – only in men.ConclusionThere are gender-related differences in the progression of carotid stiffness parameters with age and in the influence of risk factors on carotid stiffness.
Background and purposeThere has been growing interest in the sex-related differences in the impact of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT). Therefore, we aimed at examining the influence of CV risk factors on CIMT in men and women and identifying differences between males and females in the risk profiles affecting CIMT.Patients and methodsThe study group consisted of 256 patients (mean age 54.7 years), including 134 females (52%), with the following CV risk factors: arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, nicotine addiction, overweight, and obesity. Subjects with the history of any overt CV disease were excluded. CIMT was measured through B-mode ultrasound examination of the right common carotid artery. In the analysis of CIMT values at different ages, the patients were divided into three age groups: 1) <45 years, 2) 45–60 years, and 3) >60 years. Regression analysis was used to examine the influence of CV risk factors on CIMT in men and women.ResultsCIMT increased with age in both men and women. Women had lower values of CIMT than men (0.54 mm vs 0.60 mm, P=0.011). The analysis in three age subgroups revealed that CIMT values were comparable in men and women in group 1 (0.48 mm vs 0.48 mm, P=0.861), but over the age of 45 years, CIMT values became significantly lower in women compared to men (group 2: 0.51 mm vs 0.63 mm, P=0.005; group 3: 0.63 mm vs 0.72 mm, P=0.020). Significant differences were observed between the sexes in terms of risk factor impact on CIMT. In men, only three factors significantly affected CIMT: age (b=+0.009, P<0.0001), hypertension (b=+0.067, P<0.05), and type 2 diabetes (b=+0.073, P<0.05). In women, apart from age (b=+0.008, P<0.0001) and type 2 diabetes (b=+0.111, P<0.01), significant factors were pulse pressure (PP; b=+0.005, P<0.0001), body mass index (b=+0.007, P<0.05), increased waist circumference (b=+0.092, P<0.01), and metabolic syndrome (b=+0.071, P<0.05). In the multiple regression analysis, independent CIMT determinants for the entire group were age (β=0.497, P<0.001) and body mass index (β=0.195, P=0.006). For males, age was the only independent determinant of CIMT (β=0.669, P<0.001). For females, these were PP (β=0.317, P=0.014), age (β=0.242, P=0.03), and increased waist circumference (β=0.207, P=0.048).ConclusionCIMT values are lower in women than in men, which is most pronounced over the age of 45 years. There are sex-related differences in the profile of CV risk factors affecting CIMT: in males, CIMT is mostly determined by age, while in females, by age, PP, and increased waist circumference.
Recently, there has been growing interest in an interplay of vascular mechanics and heart function (arterial-ventricular-atrial coupling). The contribution of arterial stiffness (AS) to left atrial (LA) enlargement is unclear. The aim of this study was to verify whether the association between carotid AS and LA volume in untreated arterial hypertension is independent of such confounders as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic function. The study included 133 patients, among them 107 individuals with hypertension (51 men and 56 women, mean age 56.8 ± 10.3 years) and 26 matched controls. Each patient was subjected to echocardiography, ultrasonographic measurement of mean carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and echo-tracking assessment of AS and wave reflection. LA volume was calculated by ellipsoid method. The indexed LA volume showed significant linear correlations with age (r = 0.32; p < 0.05), BMI (r = 0.21; p < 0.05), pulse pressure (r = 0.26; p < 0.05), B-type natriuretic peptide (r = 0.64; p < 0.05), LV end-diastolic volume (r = 0.42; p < 0.05), LV mass index (LVMI; r = 0.58; p < 0.05), septum thickness (r = 0.40; p < 0.05), posterior wall thickness (r = 0.34; p < 0.05), early filling wave of mitral inflow (E; r = 0.30; p < 0.05), early diastolic myocardial velocity of mitral annulus (e'; r = - 0.22; p < 0.05), E/e' ratio (r = 0.45; p < 0.05), IMT (r = 0.26; p < 0.05) and augmentation index (AI; r = 0.27; p < 0.05). Progressive multivariate analysis identified LVMI, age, AI and BMI as independent determinants of indexed LA volume in patients with arterial hypertension. The study showed the significant relationship between wave reflection expressed by AI and LA structural remodeling, which supports the hypothesis of arterial-atrial coupling in hypertension.
BackgroundLittle is known about the sex-specific differences in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) predictors. We hypothesized that arterial stiffness (AS) may play a different role in the etiology of LV DD in hypertensive men and postmenopausal women, acting independently from other established predictors of this condition, such as age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, LV remodeling, and systolic function.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to analyze the sex-specific differences in AS and other predictors of LV DD in men and postmenopausal women with untreated hypertension (HTN).Patients and methodsThe study included 144 patients (63 postmenopausal women and 81 men, mean age 62.7±6.7 years) with previously untreated HTN and no history of cardiovascular diseases. All patients were subjected to detailed echocardiography, vascular ultrasound, and high-resolution echotracking (eTracking) of carotid arteries.ResultsIn the multivariate analysis, concomitant diabetes mellitus turned out to be an independent predictor of LV DD in women (P=0.02). In turn, two independent predictors of LV DD have been identified in men: S′-tissue Doppler-derived peak LV longitudinal systolic shortening velocity (P=0.001) and β, beta stiffness index (P=0.004).ConclusionThere are sex differences in the predictors of LV DD in untreated HTN. In postmenopausal women, LV DD is mostly determined by diabetes, while in men, it is determined by S′, reflecting LV systolic longitudinal function, and β, a parameter of AS.
There is a significant relationship between carotid arterial stiffness but not intima-media thickness and LA volume in patients with untreated hypertension.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.