No abstract

Human beings have relied on herbs and medicinal plants as sources of food and remedy from time immemorial. Bioactive compounds from plants are currently the subject of much research interest, but their extraction as part of phytochemical and/or biological investigations present specific challenges. Herbalists or scientists have developed many protocols of extraction of bioactive ingredients to ensure the effectiveness and the efficacy of crude drugs that were used to get relief from sickness. With the advent of new leads from plants such as morphine, quinine, taxol, artemisinin, and alkaloids from Voacanga species, a lot of attention is paid to the mode of extraction of active phytochemicals to limit the cost linked to the synthesis and isolation. Thus, the extraction of active compounds from plants needs appropriate extraction methods and techniques that provide bioactive ingredients-rich extracts and fractions. The extraction procedures, therefore, play a critical role in the yield, the nature of phytochemical content, etc. This chapter aims to present, describe, and compare extraction procedures of bioactive compounds from herbs and medicinal plants.

Hunteria umbellata K. Schum has been reported for the treatment of diabetes in Nigeria. In the present study, the ethanolic extract of dried leaves of Hunteria umbellata K. Schum was investigated for the chemical principles. The isolated pure compounds were characterized by NMR, IR and Mass spectral studies. Ursolic acid (1), oleanolic acid (2) and squalene (3) were the main constituents isolated from the extract.

The phytochemical investigation of the methanol extract of the bark of Croton oligandrus Pierre ex Hutch yielded a new clerodane-type diterpenoid crotoliganfuran (1) along with ten other compounds including 12-epicrotocorylifuran (2), lupeol (3), syringic acid (4), aleuritolic acid acetate (5), aleuritolic acid (6), scopoletin (7), geddic acid (8), β-sitosterol (9), vanilic acid (10) and stigmastane-3,6-dione (11). Their structures were established by spectroscopic means. The extract and all the isolates were screened for their inhibitory properties against butyrylcholinesterase and urease enzymes, respectively. The extract and compounds 1, 4 and 7 displayed the most potent urease inhibitory properties with IC 50 values, 20.5, 22.2, 26.7 and 28.5 µM, respectively. Compound 9 was the most active of all the tested compounds against butyrylcholinesterase enzyme with an IC 50 value of 36.3 µM.

No abstract