Supplier selection is an important strategic decision to be made in additive manufacturing supply chains. This paper presents a hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process-Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (AHP-PROMETHEE) algorithms-based Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for supplier selection in a risk-based environment. Our approach is contrasted with an FMEA based on a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for modeling assessment and mitigation of risk. In the FAHP method, the selection of the best supplier is based on the value of the weighted RPN whereas, in the hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE method, the selection of the best supplier is based on the value of outranking. An illustrative case study is used for a comparative analysis between the two methods. The AHP-PROMETHEE algorithmsbased FMEA was the preferred method based on ease of implementation, accuracy of results and higher decision-maker involvement as compared to the FAHP method. This research develops a hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE algorithms-based FMEA to incorporate risk criteria toward systematic evaluation of suppliers for supply chain management.
In today’s global environment, supplier selection is one of the critical strategic decisions made by supply chain management. The supplier selection process involves the evaluation of suppliers based on several criteria, including their core capabilities, price offerings, lead times, geographical proximity, data collection sensor networks, and associated risks. The ubiquitous presence of internet of things (IoT) sensors at different levels of supply chains can result in risks that cascade to the upstream end of the supply chain, making it imperative to implement a systematic supplier selection methodology. This research proposes a combinatorial approach for risk assessment in supplier selection using the failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) with hybrid analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE). The FMEA is used to identify the failure modes based on a set of supplier criteria. The AHP is implemented to determine the global weights for each criterion, and PROMETHEE is used to prioritize the optimal supplier based on the lowest supply chain risk. The integration of multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods overcomes the shortcomings of the traditional FMEA and enhances the precision of prioritizing the risk priority numbers (RPN). A case study is presented to validate the combinatorial model. The outcomes indicate that suppliers were evaluated more effectively based on company chosen criteria to select a low-risk supplier over the traditional FMEA approach. This research establishes a foundation for the application of multicriteria decision-making methodology for unbiased prioritization of critical supplier selection criteria and evaluation of different supply chain suppliers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.