In Article 1, Sub-Article 7, Act Number 6 2014 on Villages, it said that the Village Regulation is a regulation stipulated by the Urban Village Head after being discussed and agreed with the Village Consultative Body. The determination of the Village Regulation is an elaboration of the various authorities which are owned by the Village which refers to the provisions of the higher legislation. As a legal product, Village Regulation should not conflict with the higher regulations and should not harm the public interest, or the general interest as mentioned in Act Number 6 2014 on Villages which are: a. the disruption of communal harmony; b. the disruption of access to public services; c. the disruption of public order and tranquillity; d. the disruption of economic activities to improve the welfare of village communities; and e. the discrimination against tribe, religion, belief, race, intergroup, and gender. Village Regulations govern the village authority based on the right of origin and village local-scale authority. The implementation is supervised by the village communities and Village Consultative Body. It is intended to make the implementation of the Village Regulation always monitored continuously by local villagers because village regulations are set for the benefit of the village community as a whole. The provisions on the right of origin are explained as "the right of origin" which is a living legacy and the initiative of the village or the initiative of the village's society in accordance with the development of community life, including indigenous peoples' organisational systems, institutions, customary law, the ground of the village's treasury, and agreements in village life as well. The meaning of "village-scale local authority" is the authority to regulate and manage the interests of the village community that has is conducted by the village, is able and effective when conducted by the village or what has arisen because of the development of the village and the village community, such as boat moorings, the village market, public baths, irrigation canals, environmental sanitation, preand postnatal health care and information, art and learning centres, and village libraries, village retention basins, and village roads. In the context of good village governance, the village regulations should reflect: 1) Participation; 2) Law enforcement (rule of law); 3) Transparency; 4) Responsive; 5) Consensus orientation; 6) Equity; 6) Effectiveness and efficiency and 7) Accountability and strategic vision. The ways and mechanisms for the formulation of village regulations that reflect the principles of good village governance will be explained further in this study, in the pre-establishment stage, establishment stage, and post-establishment stage of village regulations.
Era otonomi daerah dalam dinamika demokrasi sekarang ini menuntut adanya partisipasi masyarakat, tidak terkecuali masyarakat desa dalam rangka mewujudkan pembangunan nasional. Oleh karena itu diperlukan regulasi di tingkat daerah termasuk regulasi di desa. Desa merupakan cikal bakal terbentuknya masyarakat politik dan pemerintahan di Indonesia jauh sebelum Negara bangsa ini terbentuk, desa merupakan daerah dengan karakter yang unik, yang dapat menyelengarakan fungsi pemerintahan dan memiliki tradisi yang berbeda antara satu dengan yang lain. Akan tetapi dalam konteks kekinian telah terjadi pergeseran otonomi di desa, dimana sekarang desa tidak lagi memiliki hak otonomi. Dalam pemerintahan desa, terdapat regulasi untuk menjalankan pemerintahan desa berdasarkan wewenang yang dimiliki desa yaitu peraturan desa. Namun karena telah terjadi pergeseran otonomi desa, peraturan desa dalam perkembangannya hanya merupakan penjabaran lebih lanjut peraturan yang lebih tinggi bukan untuk menjalankan otonomi.Kata Kunci: Peraturan Desa, Pemerintahan Desa, Otonomi.
National development planning model with its long-term time dimension in Indonesia is carried out with the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) which replaces the Planned Overall National Development (PNSB) and the General Outlines of the Principles of the State (GBHN). Based on the analysis of the data obtained, it can be seen that since 2004 the use of the RPJN has turned out to cause fluctuating dynamics in the existing development outcomes. The occurred changes resulted in inconsistencies in the direction of development when there was a change of state development actors such as President, Governor, Regent/ Mayor, and other state institutions. The reason for this is that there is no permanent structure that can be used as a reference for a long-term development program that will be carried out by the managing state institutions, particularly the government. Based on this, the aim of this study was to create a form of reformulation of the principles of the state. This research was a normative research with a statutory, historical and conceptual approaches. To answer this problem, the idea of the state principles was born which departed from combining the advantages of PNSB, GBHN, and RPJPN which were then packaged into a new state principle system, with ideological principle and technocratic strategy.
AbstrakBerlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan telah memberikan perubahan terhadap kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Terdapat dua mekanisme pemeriksaan sengketa di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap gugatan atau permohonan yang diajukan oleh masyarakat. Mekanisme pertama, dengan mengajukan gugatan langsung ke pengadilan tata usaha negara. Mekanisme kedua, dengan menyelesaikan sengketa di lingkungan internal pemerintahan terlebih dahulu sebelum mengajukan gugatan kepada pengadilan tata usaha negara. Adanya dua mekanisme pemeriksaan perkara tersebut membuktikan adanya perbedaan perlakuan bagi masyarakat pencari keadilan dalam sistem pemeriksaan perkara di peradilan tata usaha negara. Penelitian ini fokus pada isu pertama hakikat perbuatan hukum publik oleh pemerintah dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dan kedua Ratio legis perlindungan hukum non yudisial terhadap perbuatan hukum publik oleh pemerintah. Hasil yang hendak dicapai adalah memberikan preskripsi tentang kebenaran yang hakiki. Ada beberapa pendekatan masalah yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini, yakni pendekatan peraturan perundangundangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case approach).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.