SUMMARY
The study investigates whether CEOs' external connections with other executives and directors are associated with enhanced financial reporting quality. We find that CEOs with larger connections have lower discretionary accruals and are less likely to have financial restatements and material internal control weaknesses. Further results show that larger social networks are associated with higher audit quality, which translates into higher audit fees. The results are robust to a variety of alternative specifications, including controls for endogeneity, and are consistent with well-connected CEOs providing economic benefits to their firms, rather than using their position to extract rents at the expense of shareholders.
With the increased focus on corporate culture as an important determinant of organizational behavior and outcomes, we study how corporate culture affects firm financial reporting quality. Relying on the Competing Values Framework (CVF) to define four types of corporate culture, we find that collaboration (competition)-oriented culture firms have lower (higher) financial reporting quality and these effects are incremental to corporate governance and tone at the top. Further analyses support our main findings and suggest that collaboration culture is associated with the likelihood of reporting a material internal control weakness, while competition culture is related to a lower likelihood of an internal control weakness and a restatement. We contribute to the "cultural revolution" led by economics and finance schools of thought and provide empirical evidence that corporate culture shapes financial reporting quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.