No abstract

BackgroundIt has been suggested that GastroPanel might be a useful tool for the diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) measuring four biomarkers in blood: basal gastrin-17 (G17), pepsinogen I and II (PGI and PGII), and Helicobacter pylori antibodies.AimTo determine the accuracy of GastroPanel for the diagnosis of CAG.MethodsThis was a prospective, blinded, multicenter study that included dyspeptic patients. G17, PGI, and PGII were determined by enzyme immunoassays. Three antrum and two corpus biopsies were obtained for standard histological analysis and rapid urease test. Biopsies were analyzed by a single blinded expert pathologist.ResultsNinety-one patients were included (77% women, mean age 44 years, 51% H. pylori positive, 17% with CAG). G17 was reduced in patients with antrum CAG (5.4 vs. 13.4 pmol/l; P<0.01) and increased in patients with corpus CAG (11 vs. 24 pmol/l; P<0.05), but its accuracy was only acceptable in the case of corpus localization [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 74%]; PGII difference was almost statistically significant only when testing for corpus atrophy (33 vs. 21 μg/l; P=0.05; AUC=72%). The PGI and PGI/PGII ratio showed no significant differences (AUCs were all unacceptably low). Helicobacter pylori antibody levels were higher in H. pylori-infected patients (251 vs. 109 EIU, P=0.01; AUC=70). The accuracy of GastroPanel for the diagnosis of CAG was as follows: sensitivity 50%; specificity 80%; positive 25% and negative 92% predictive values; and positive 2.4 and negative 0.6 likelihood ratios.ConclusionGastroPanel is not accurate enough for the diagnosis of CAG; thus, its systematic use in clinical practice cannot be recommended.

Head and neck paragangliomas are usually asymptomatic and benign tumours arising mainly from the carotid body and the vagal, tympanic or jugular glomus. The majority of patients develop sporadic masses, and around 30% of cases harbour germline mutations in one of the succinate dehydrogenase genes: SDHB, SDHC or SDHD. In these hereditary cases, the presence of familial antecedents of the disease, multiplicity/bilaterality, young age at onset, and more recently, presence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours, are main factors to be considered. Here we describe a new mutation (c.256-257insTTT) affecting the SDHC gene in a 60-year-old-patient with a single head and neck paraganglioma, and without familial antecedents of the disease. In silico splice site analysis showed that this variant created a cryptic splice acceptor site and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) supported the pathogenic role of the mutation. Control population analyses did not detect this variant but revealed a novel SDHC polymorphism that exhibited a frequency of 0.3% (3/1020). This latter finding highlights the importance of assessing the clinical relevance of variants of unknown significance by means of analysing sufficient controls. Despite having found a germline mutation in an older, apparently sporadic patient, we consider that the high costs of analysing all susceptibility genes related to the disease support the recommendation of screening for mutations only in patients fulfilling the above criteria.

No abstract

Metastasis to the parotid region is rare, and originates primarily from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma of the skin. Renal clear cell adenocarcinoma has considerable metastatic potential and the parotid gland is one possible destination. Histopathologic study is important to differentiate this entity from primary clear cell parotid neoplasm.