Seventy-seven patients underwent T1-weighted spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Group 1 (n = 56) consisted of patients with various types of congenital heart disease but normal pulmonary veins. Group 2 (n = 22) consisted of patients with the following conditions: partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection (n = 11), total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (n = 5), cor triatriatum (n = 4), or pulmonary vein stenosis (n = 2). In group 1, the sites of connections of all four pulmonary veins were identified with MR imaging in 88% of cases; the connections of at least three pulmonary veins were seen in all patients. In group 2, the prospective detection rate of pulmonary venous abnormalities with MR imaging was 95%. The prospective detection rates of pulmonary venous abnormalities with cardiac angiography (n = 13) and echo-cardiography (n = 13) were 69% and 38%, respectively. This study indicates that MR imaging can accurately demonstrate the normal pulmonary veins and abnormalities of the pulmonary veins.

No abstract

The results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared with those of arthroscopy in a prospective series of 244 patients. A dedicated system for MRI of limbs and peripheral joints--the 0.2-T Artoscan (Esaote, Italy)--was used for imaging knee joint lesions. T1-weighted spin-echo sagittal images, T2-weighted gradient-echo coronal images, and axial views for lesions of the femoropatellar joint were acquired. Paraxial sagittal and oblique coronal views were obtained for imaging of the cruciate ligaments. This protocol allowed excellent visualization of the cruciate ligaments and medial and lateral meniscus in almost all patients. Compared with arthroscopy performed within 48 h after imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively 93%, 97%, and 95% for tears of the medial meniscus; 82%, 96%, and 93% for tears of the lateral meniscus; 100%, 100%, and 100% for tears of the posterior cruciate ligament; 98%, 98%, and 97% for tears of the anterior cruciate ligament; and 72%, 100%, and 92% for full-thickness articular cartilage lesions. The examination can be performed within 30-45 min at lower cost than diagnostic arthroscopy. MRI with a 0.2-T magnet is a safe and valuable adjunct to the clinical examination of the knee and an aid to efficient preoperative planning.

Sclerotherapy is a safe and effective alternative treatment of idiopathic varicocele. It can be performed on an outpatient basis. Success depends on the anatomic variant.

No abstract

Diagnostic procedures currently utilized for determining nodal status in patients with head and neck primary carcinomas are reviewed. Diagnostic procedures include clinical palpation, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. Each technique is discussed on the basis of clinical experience at the Technical University of Munich.

In the age of health care cost containment new imaging technology has to meet diagnostic requirements as well as economic limitations. In the MR sector new dedicated systems promise reliable diagnostic information at considerably lower costs than whole-body imagers. Within the past 18 months we have examined 2200 patients with acute and chronic lesions of peripheral joints (knee, ankle, foot, elbow, wrist, hand) in a 0.2T dedicated MR system (ARTOSCAN, Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy). We report our experience with this system focusing on its special features, cost-effectiveness and on diagnostic accuracy of low-field MR studies of the knee in correlation with arthroscopy and in comparison with high-field whole-body imagers.

Gated transverse magnetic resonance (MR) images of 54 patients (35 male, 19 female; aged 16-90 years) with suspected or known aortic dissection were reviewed by three cardiac radiologists without knowledge of clinical details. The reviewers independently determined the presence or absence and the type of aortic dissection. A confidence level was assigned for each diagnosis, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. The reviewer with extensive MR experience correctly identified 96% of the proved aortic dissections and all of the normal cases; the reviewer with moderate experience identified 96% and 84%, respectively; and the reviewer with minimal experience, 78% and 94%. The sensitivity at a specificity level of 90% was determined for each reviewer (100%, 96%, and 83%, respectively). MR imaging is highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of aortic dissection but does require considerable experience because of the need to recognize flow artifacts.