Termites, Coptotermes formosanus, reared individually, were highly susceptible to the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae, while termites reared in groups were highly resistant. When reared in groups, the termites treated with M. anisopliae conidia on the body surface were groomed by their nestmates and more than 80% of the conidia were removed from the cuticle within 3 h. However, there was not a significant reduction in the numbers of conidia on the body surfaces of termites reared individually. For the termites maintained in groups, conidia were found in foreguts, midguts and hindguts, but very few conidia were detected in the guts of termites reared individually. Conidia in the alimentary tracts did not germinate, but some of were alive. As a result, it seems that the removal of foreign bodies, such as fungal conidia, from the cuticle is one function of termite mutual grooming behavior and that conidia removed from the cuticle are eliminated through alimentary tracts. This study indicates that mutual grooming behavior is very effective in protecting these termites from M. anisopliae infection.

No abstract

Grooming is a well-recognized, multipurpose, behavior in arthropods and vertebrates. In this paper, we review the literature to highlight the physical function, neurophysiological mechanisms, and role that grooming plays in insect defense against pathogenic infection. The intricate relationships between the physical, neurological and immunological mechanisms of grooming are discussed to illustrate the importance of this behavior when examining the ecology of insect-pathogen interactions.

In social insects, grooming is considered as a behavioral defense against pathogen and parasite infections since it contributes to remove microbes from their cuticle. However, stimuli which trigger this behavior are not well characterized yet. We examined if activating contact chemoreceptive sensilla could trigger grooming activities in Drosophila melanogaster. We monitored the grooming responses of decapitated flies to compounds known to activate the immune system, e.g., dead Escherichia coli (Ec) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and to tastants such as quinine, sucrose, and salt. LPS, quinine, and Ec were quite effective in triggering grooming movements when touching the distal border of the wings and the legs, while sucrose had no effect. Contact chemoreceptors are necessary and sufficient to elicit such responses, as grooming could not be elicited by LPS in poxn mutants deprived of external taste sensilla, and as grooming was elicited by light when a channel rhodopsin receptor was expressed in bitter-sensitive cells expressing Gr33a. Contact chemoreceptors distributed along the distal border of the wings respond to these tastants by an increased spiking activity, in response to quinine, Ec, LPS, sucrose, and KCl. These results demonstrate for the first time that bacterial compounds trigger grooming activities in D. melanogaster, and indicate that contact chemoreceptors located on the wings participate in the detection of such chemicals.