The activities of non-haematopoietic cells (NHCs), including mesenchymal stromal cells and endothelial cells, in lymphomas are reported to underlie lymphomagenesis. However, our understanding of lymphoma NHCs has been hampered by unexplained NHC heterogeneity, even in normal human lymph nodes (LNs). Here we constructed a single-cell transcriptome atlas of more than 100,000 NHCs collected from 27 human samples, including LNs and various nodal lymphomas, and it revealed 30 distinct subclusters, including some that were previously unrecognized. Notably, this atlas was useful for comparative analyses with lymphoma NHCs, which revealed an unanticipated landscape of subcluster-specific changes in gene expression and interaction with malignant cells in follicular lymphoma NHCs. This facilitates our understanding of stromal remodelling in lymphoma and highlights potential clinical biomarkers. Our study largely updates NHC taxonomy in human LNs and analysis of disease status, and provides a rich resource and deeper insights into LN and lymphoma biology to advance lymphoma management and therapy.
Giant cell tumors of soft tissue (GCT-ST) arising in the breast are extremely rare. Herein, we report a case of a 45-year-old woman with a 5-cm mass in her left breast. Ultrasonography revealed a mainly well-circumscribed mass that contained a cystic lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a fibrous capsule-covered mass that contained a high-intensity area, suggesting hemorrhaging. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) revealed mononuclear histiocytic cells with a round shape or spindled appearance that was mixed with multinucleated giant cells. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed CD68-positive staining in the mononuclear and giant cells but negative staining for pancytokeratin. Preoperatively, the tumor was highly suspected of being GCT-ST. Histopathological results after a left mastectomy showed similar findings to CNB. The final diagnosis was GCT-ST in the breast. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a GCT-ST arising in the breast diagnosed by ultrasound-guided CNB.
Introduction
Recently, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been reported to be prognostic and/or predictive factors in breast cancer. However, most of the investigations on the relationship between systemic inflammatory markers and prognosis have been conducted perioperatively, with few studies reporting on patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer (MBC). Here, we investigated the role of ALC and NLR as prognostic factors of MBC.
Methods
This was a retrospective observational study of patients with MBC treated at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2013 and 2020. ALC and NLR clinical data were obtained from the patients’ charts. Based on previous reports, the cutoff value of ALC was set at 1500/µL, and that of NLR, at 3. We investigated the prognostic significance of ALC and NLR.
Results
About 80% of the 243 included patients were hormone receptor-positive, 20% were HER2-positive and 10% were triple-negative. The patients were grouped as follows: 114 (46.9%) and 129 (53.1%) in the high and low ALC groups and 145 (59.7%) and 98 (40.3%) in the high and low NLR groups, respectively. The group with high ALC at diagnosis of MBC showed significantly better prognosis (p = 0.002), and the median overall survival (OS) was 70.9 months, as compared with 40.2 months for the low ALC group. On multivariate analysis, visceral metastasis, subtype and ALC were independent variables for OS; NLR status was not correlated with OS.
Conclusions
Analysis of real-world data suggests that ALC at diagnosis of MBC is an independent prognostic factor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.