Introduction Unsupervised digital cognitive testing is an appealing means to capture subtle cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we describe development, feasibility, and validity of the Boston Remote Assessment for Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH) against in‐person cognitive testing and amyloid/tau burden. Methods BRANCH is web‐based, self‐guided, and assesses memory processes vulnerable in AD. Clinically normal participants (n = 234; aged 50–89) completed BRANCH; a subset underwent in‐person cognitive testing and positron emission tomography imaging. Mean accuracy across BRANCH tests (Categories, Face‐Name‐Occupation, Groceries, Signs) was calculated. Results BRANCH was feasible to complete on participants’ own devices (primarily smartphones). Technical difficulties and invalid/unusable data were infrequent. BRANCH psychometric properties were sound, including good retest reliability. BRANCH was correlated with in‐person cognitive testing ( r = 0.617, P < .001). Lower BRANCH score was associated with greater amyloid ( r = –0.205, P = .007) and entorhinal tau ( r = –0.178, P = .026). Discussion BRANCH reliably captures meaningful cognitive information remotely, suggesting promise as a digital cognitive marker sensitive early in the AD trajectory.

Introduction We determine whether diminished Learning Over Repeated Exposures (LORE) identifies subtle memory decrements in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker burden. Methods Ninety‐four CU participants (mean age = 77.6 ± 5.02) completed a challenging associative memory test, at home, monthly, for up to 1 year (mean = 9.97 months) on a study‐issued iPad. Learning curves for face‐name memory were computed for two versions completed monthly: same face‐name pairs (A‐A‐A) and alternate face‐name pairs (B‐C‐D). Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging characterized global amyloid (Pittsburgh Compound‐B (PiB); amyloid beta (Aβ)+/−) and regional tau burden (flortaucipir). Results Diminished LORE for same (but not alternate) face‐name pairs was associated with greater amyloid and tau burden. Aβ+/− group differences for same face‐name pairs emerged by the fourth exposure and was of medium‐to‐large magnitude (Cohen's d = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25‐1.08). Discussion Subtle decrements in learning related to AD pathological burden in CU are detectable over short time‐intervals (ie, months). Implications for prevention trial design are discussed.

No abstract

Background Detailed longitudinal neuropsychological assessment in the Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS) and related studies has revealed that subtle decrements in associative and semantic memory, as well as reduced practice effects for repeated items may be the earliest cognitive changes in preclinical AD. Utilizing digital, repeated, and remote assessment of these cognitive functions has the potential to increase the rapidity and ease with which these subtle changes can be detected. We previously showed that diminished practice effects on a challenging iPad‐based monthly face‐name memory paradigm was associated with neuroimaging markers of amyloid and tau in normal older adults participating in HABS. These findings inspired the development of the Boston Remote Assessment of Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH), a smartphone‐based associative and semantic memory assessment using stimuli and tasks relevant to everyday life designed for serial assessment. Method We describe the development, feasibility, and pilot data from a smartphone‐based memory assessment administered daily (over consecutive days) in normal older adults using their own devices. BRANCH includes 2 measures of paired associative learning (faces and names, groceries and prices), an associative memory test with facilitated encoding (categories), and a continuous visual recognition task (street signs). A total of 41 pilot participants (mean age=76.1; 64% female) completed 1 version of BRANCH in clinic and 4 versions remotely on their own mobile device for 4 consecutive days. Participants also completed standard paper and pencil testing and a questionnaire about their experience completing the task. Result BRANCH was feasible with a total of 80% of individuals completing all assessments in the correct order. It was acceptable to participants with 64% finding the tasks at‐least somewhat to highly engaging. Older age and general cognition (e.g., MMSE) was associated with worse performance across memory tasks. Improved performance (practice effect) was observed on daily administration of paired associative memory tasks (Figure 1.). Conclusion A theoretically and evidence‐based digital memory assessment with ecologically‐valid tasks and stimuli is feasible for older adults to complete independently on their own devices. Digital assessment over multiple timepoints has the potential to drastically improve the efficiency with which cognitive performance and subtle decline can be captured.