Resin modified glass ionomer cement as restorative material used in dentistry especially in primary teeth. Fresh milk is often consumed by children as daily drink and it contains lactic acid. The aim of this study was to evaluate surface roughness of resin modified glass ionomer cement after immersed in fresh milk for 2, 4, and 6 hours. Samples were disc shape resin modified glass ionomer cement with size 5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness. Totally 24 samples were divided into 3 groups (n=8), group immersed for 2 hours, group immersed for 4 hours, and group immersed for 6 hours. Fresh milk was pure cow’s milk that harvest in the morning by the farmer. Surface roughness measurements was done before and after immersed using a profilometer (Surfcorder SE-300, Laboratory Ltd, Japan). Results showed surface roughness change were 0.0217 ± 0.005 μm for groups A, 0.0366 ± 0.006 μm for groups B, and 0.0555 ± 0.004μm for groups of 6 hours. One Way Anova test showed significant differences between groups (p <0.05). It can be concluded that there was significant increased on surface roughness of modified resin ionomer cement after immersed in fresh milk for 2, 4 and 6 hours.
Surface hardness of restoration materials affected its wear resistance and longevity. The addition of hydroxyapatite could improve mechanical properties of restoration material. Hydroxyapatite can be synthesized from fish scales for it contain calcium carbonate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface hardness of conventional and resin modified glass ionomers cement by incorporation of different wt% of hydroxyapatite from Black tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus) scales. Hydroxyapatite was synthesized from black tilapia scales by calcination method. Samples with a diameter of 5 mm and a height of 2 mm were made from conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cement, then divided into 7 groups (n=10), namely control, 2wt% GIC, 5wt% GIC, 8wt% GIC, 2wt% RMGIC, 5wt% RMGIC, and 8wt% RMGIC. Surface hardness test was measured with Vickers Hardness Tester. Result showed hardness value from each groups respectively were 49.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate transverse strength of heat cured acrylic resin after immersed in 0,2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes.
Methods:This was an experimental laboratory study with posttest only group design. The samples were heat cured acrylic resin plate with size 65mm x 10mm x 2,5mm. Polymerization of the heat cured acrylic was done by water bath (74 °C for 2hrs followed by 100 °C for 1hr). Totally 30 samples were prepared and divided into 5 groups (n=6) which are group I as control, and others were immersed in 0, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, group II (15 minutes), group III (30 minutes), group IV (45 minutes) and group V (60 minutes) respectively. The transverse strength was test using Torsee's Universal Testing machine, Japan with crosshead 1/10 mm/seconds. The data was statistically analyzed using one way ANOVA (p≤0,005).
Conclusion:The immersion in 0, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash at different period does not changed transverse strength of heat cured acrylic resin.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface hardness of hybrid ionomer with different curing times (20, 30, 40, and 50 seconds).
Methods:This was an experimental laboratory with posttest only group design. Twenty-four disk shape hybrid ionomer specimens with a diameter of 5 mm and 2 mm in thickness were prepared and polymerized with Quartz Tungsten Halogen (QTH) for 20, 30, 40, and 50 seconds as group 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. All samples were immersed in distilled water under 37°C temperature for 24 hours as initial treatment. Surface hardness test was done using Vickers Hardness Test with load 50 gf for 20 second. The Data was analyzed with one way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05).Results: Using one way anova test (p ≤ 0.05) shows the mean and standard deviation of the group 1 is 25,900 ± 2,5659VHN; group 2 is 29,800 ± 1,1983 VHN; group 3 is 31,283 ± 0,5037 VHN; group 4 is 36, 183 ± 2,3430 VHN and the obtained value p = 0.000 (p ≤ 0.05).The mean values and standard deviation were 25.900 ± 2.5659 VHN; 29.800 ± 1.1983 VHN; 31.283 ±0.5037 VHN; 6.183 ± 2.3430 VHN for group 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Statistic analyzed showed a significant different among groups with p value =0.000 (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:There are significant differences in surface hardness of hybrid ionomer with different curing time (20, 30,40, and 50 seconds). The longer curing time will increase the surface hardness of hybrid ionomer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.