Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an accurate tool for the determination of right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. However, the current standard short-axis technique is time-consuming and thus, often not practicable for routine daily use, because papillary muscles and trabeculations have to be marked and their volumes subtracted from the total ventricular volume. To reduce calculation time we evaluated the volumetric data that included papillary muscle and trabecular volumes and compared the outcome with the results of the standard technique. Thirty patients (17 healthy, 13 with coronary heart disease) were examined by CMR using TrueFISP (Magnetom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were calculated using the standard short-axis technique and then again without subtracting papillary and trabecular volumes. The two methods were compared by determining the differences in results for ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. Statistically significant differences were found between the two methods for right and left ventricular stroke volumes and end-systolic volumes, and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (EDV) (p < or = 0.011). No significant difference was found for right ventricular end-diastolic volumes (p > or = 0.149) or left or right ventricular ejection fraction (p > or = 0.130). Except in the case of left ventricular EDV, the deviations in the results of method 1 and method 2 did not vary significantly with the presence or absence of heart disease. Measurements were obtained considerably more quickly with the modified method than with the standard short-axis method (25 +/- 4 min vs. 13 +/- 3 min, p = 0.000). Although systematic differences were found when papillary and trabecular volumes were not subtracted, these differences are small and may not be of clinical relevance in healthy subjects or patients with coronary heart disease. Not subtracting the volumes of these structures enables faster determination of right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions without loss of the accuracy associated with the standard short-axis technique.

The biplane area-length method can be used in CMR images obtained by TrueFISP to assess left atrial volumes and ejection fraction in normal subjects and patients with varying cardiac cycle length, as in atrial fibrillation.

No abstract

LAEDD differ significantly according to the image plane. We provide reference values for CMR using prospective triggering in the evaluation of left atrial diameters to identify patients with enlarged left atria and for follow-up studies.

The gating method has a significant impact on volume and EF measurements. The global ventricular EF is underestimated by using the prospective triggering technique. However, the difference in the left ventricle is small and might not be of clinical relevance.

Background. Because cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is becoming increasingly available in clinical practice, there is a need to establish normal values for left atrial dimensions as determined by this method to allow accurate assessment of cardiac dimensions and to provide standardization for follow up studies. For clinical purpose measurements of the left atrial end diastolic diameter (LAEDD) are most appropriate to assess left atrial size. We aimed to establish normal values for LAEDD using CMR and a fast gradient-echo sequence with steady-state free precession (SSFP). Methods. A total of 111 healthy subjects (52 women and 59 men, mean age 51.5 ± 14.5 years) were examined by CMR. Images were acquired using SSFP in the horizontal (HLA) and vertical (VLA) long axis planes and the left ventricular outflow tract plane (LVOT) to measure the LAEDD. Results. Age between men and women was not different (p = 0.7050). CMR yielded the following normal ranges for LAEDD: HLA 4.5 ± 0.4 cm for men and 4.2 ± 0.5 for women, VLA 4.5 ± 0.5 cm for men and 4.2 ± 0.4 for women, and LVOT 2.8 ± 0.3 cm for men and 2.8 ± 0.4 for women. LAEDD were significantly larger in HLA and VLA than in LVOT (p 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the measurements between HLA and VLA (p = 0.4617). Gender-related differences for LAEDD were found in HLA (p = 0.0087) and VLA (p = 0.0015) but not in LVOT (p = 0.5281). LAEDD were not found to be age-related (p ! 0.0994). Conclusions. LAEDD differ significantly according to the image plane. We provide reference values for CMR using prospective triggering in the evaluation of left atrial diameters to identify patients with enlarged left atria and for followup studies.

The gating method has a significant impact on atrial volume and EF measurements. Atrial EF is underestimated by using the prospective triggering technique.

No abstract