The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of the Root ZX device to avoid instrumentation beyond the apical foramen in premolars after conventional working length radiography. Thirty extracted premolars with 43 root canals were subjected to radiographic and electronic working length determination. Radiographic working length determination resulted in overestimation in 51% of the root canals, although the measuring file tip was located to be 0 to 2 mm short of the radiographic apex. Electronic working length measurements with the Root ZX reduced the percentage of overestimation to 21%. In 6 root canals (14%), both radiographic and electronic working length measurements led to overestimation. It is concluded that complementing radiographic working length determination with electronic apex locator measurements may help to avoid overestimation beyond the apical foramen in premolars.

This study was designed to determine the efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals. Seventy-five oval canals were equally divided into three groups. The apical third was prepared with rotary LightSpeed instruments either to size 52.5 (mandibular incisors) or to size 57.5 (distal root of mandibular molars). The middle third with an oval cross-section was shaped with Hedström hand files using circumferential technique, with 6% taper rotary Hero files in a circumferential filing movement or with rotary LightSpeed instruments in a step-back technique. Instrumentation was performed under clinical conditions in a phantom head. The teeth were sectioned at two levels in the middle third of the root. An assembly technique allowed comparing the canal outline before and after instrumentation. The photographed root sections were superimposed and traced under a stereomicroscope. The ratio of prepared to unprepared canal outline was calculated for each section. The lowest values were observed in the LightSpeed group (mean: 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37; 0.47). Significantly higher values were recorded in the Hero group (mean: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.53; 0.64) and in the Hedström group (mean: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.49; 0.62). No instrumentation technique was capable of completely preparing dentin walls of oval root canals. Circumferential filing of the middle third of oval root canals with either 6% taper Hero files or conventional Hedström hand files gave comparable results.

No abstract

No instrumentation technique was able to circumferentially prepare the oval outline of root canals. Nevertheless, instruments with greater taper (ProTaper and Mtwo) were more efficient than NiTi- hand files, but this was, in some cases, at the expense of remaining dentine-wall thickness.

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine how frequent a seemingly accurate working length ending radiographically 0 to 2 mm short of the radiographic apex resulted in an instrumentation beyond the apical foramen. Under simulated clinical conditions working lengths of 169 root canals were radiographically determined in 91 extracted teeth. In all cases the measuring files adjusted to the final working length (Iwork) were located 0 to 2 mm short of the radiographic apex. Iwork was subsequently compared with the actual reference length (Iref) representing the distance between the apical foramen and the coronal reference. Instrumentation beyond the apical foramen (Iwork > ref) occurred in premolars in 51% (95% confidence interval: 36%; 66%) of the cases, in molars in 22% (95% confidence interval: 14%; 30%), and in anterior teeth in no case. These results suggest that in premolars and molars a radiographically working length ending 0 to 2 mm short of the radiographic apex provides, more often than expected, a basis for unintentional overinstrumentation.