The epigenome is defined by DNA methylation patterns and the associated posttranslational modifications of histones. This histone code determines the expression status of individual genes dependent upon their localization on the chromatin. The silencing of gene expression is associated with deacetylated histones, which are often found to be associated with regions of DNA methylation as well as methylation at the lysine 4 residue of histone 3. In contrast, the activation of gene expression is associated with acetylated histones and methylation at the lysine 9 residue of histone 3. The histone deactylases play a major role in keeping the balance between the acetylated and deacetylated states of chromatin. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are divided into three classes: class I HDACs (HDACs 1, 2, 3, and 8) are similar to the yeast RPD3 protein and localize to the nucleus; class II HDACs (HDACs 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10) are homologous to the yeast HDA1 protein and are found in both the nucleus and cytoplasm; and class III HDACs form a structurally distinct class of NAD-dependent enzymes that are similar to the yeast SIR2 proteins. Since inappropriate silencing of critical genes can result in one or both hits of tumor suppressor gene (TSG) inactivation in cancer, theoretically the reactivation of affected TSGs could have an enormous therapeutic value in preventing and treating cancer. Indeed, several HDAC inhibitors are currently being developed and tested for their potency in cancer chemotherapy. Importantly, these agents are also potentially applicable to chemoprevention if their toxicity can be minimized. Despite the toxic side effects and lack of specificity of some of the inhibitors, progress is being made. With the elucidation of the structures, functions and modes of action of HDACs, finding agents that may be targeted to specific HDACs and potentially reactivate expression of only a defined set of affected genes in cancer will be more attainable.

The achaete-scute genes encode essential transcription factors in normal Drosophila and vertebrate nervous system development. Human achaete-scute homolog-1 (hASH1) is constitutively expressed in a human lung cancer with neuroendocrine (NE) features, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and is essential for development of the normal pulmonary NE cells that most resemble this neoplasm. Mechanisms regulating achaete-scute homolog expression outside of Drosophila are presently unclear, either in the context of the developing nervous system or in normal or neoplastic cells with NE features. We now provide evidence that the protein hairy-enhancer-of-split-1 (HES-1) acts in a similar manner as its Drosophila homolog, hairy, to transcriptionally repress achaete-scute expression. HES-1 protein is detected at abundant levels in most non-NE human lung cancer cell lines which lack hASH1 but is virtually absent in hASH1-expressing lung cancer cells. Moreover, induction of HES-1 in a SCLC cell line down-regulates endogenous hASH1 gene expression. The repressive effect of HES-1 is directly mediated by binding of the protein to a class C site in the hASH1 promoter. Thus, a key part of the process that determines neural fate in Drosophila is conserved in human lung cancer cells. Furthermore, modulation of this pathway may underlie the constitutive hASH1 expression seen in NE tumors such as SCLC, the most virulent human lung cancer.Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors homologous to the Drosophila achaete-scute complex (AS-C) are critical to nervous system development in multiple organisms (1-9). Specifically, mouse transgenic knockout studies indicate that transient expression of achaete-scute homolog-1 (termed MASH1) in neural precursor cells is necessary for establishment of a subset of autonomic, olfactory, and enteric neurons, and adrenal chromaffin cells (1, 6). Recently, we have shown that human achaete-scute homolog-1 (hASH1) is constitutively expressed in an important tumor, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (10), which accounts for 25% of over 150,000 new cases of lung cancer each year. In this extremely virulent and metastatic cancer where the 5-year survival is less than 5%, hASH1 expression appears tightly linked to the neuroendocrine (NE) properties that characterize SCLC (11-13). The possibility that this transcription factor could be integral to the process of NE differentiation is underscored by our recent finding that pulmonary NE cells, the normal bronchial cells that most resemble the SCLC phenotype, fail to develop in transgenic mice homozygous for MASH1 deletion (13). Furthermore, depletion of hASH1 in classic SCLC lines results in a significant reduction of NE marker expression (13). These data indicate that delineating the molecular events which lead to constitutive hASH1 expression may prove essential for understanding the establishment of the NE phenotype in SCLC.

An activated ras oncogene induces a program of differentiation in the human medullary thyroid cancer cell line TT. This differentiation process is accompanied by a marked increase in the transcription of the human calcitonin (CT) gene. We have localized a unique Ras-responsive transcriptional element (RRE) in the CT gene promoter. DNase I protection indicates two domains of protein-DNA interaction, and each domain separately can confer Ras-mediated transcriptional inducibility. This bipartite RRE was also found to be Raf responsive. By affinity screening, we have cloned a cDNA coding for a zinc finger transcription factor (RREB-1) that binds to the distal RRE. The consensus binding site for this factor is CCCCAAACCACCCC. RREB-1 is expressed ubiquitously in human tissues outside the adult brain. Overexpression of RREB-1 protein in TT cells confers the ability to mediate increased transactivation of the CT gene promoter-reporter construct during Ras-or Raf-induced differentiation. These data suggest that RREB-1 may play a role in Ras and Raf signal transduction in medullary thyroid cancer and other cells.

Breast cancer progression is associated with aberrant DNA methylation and expression of genes that control the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a critical step in malignant conversion. Although the genes affected have been studied, there is little understanding of how aberrant activation of the DNA methylation machinery itself occurs. Using a breast cancer cell-based model system, we found that cells that underwent EMT exhibited overactive transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling and loss of expression of the CDH1, CGN, CLDN4, and KLK10 genes as a result of hypermethylation of their corresponding promoter regions. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that activated TGFβ-Smad signaling provides an "epigenetic memory" to maintain silencing of critical genes. In support of this hypothesis, disrupting Smad signaling in mesenchymal breast cancer cells resulted in DNA demethylation and reexpression of the genes identified. This epigenetic reversal was accompanied by an acquisition of epithelial morphology and a suppression of invasive properties. Notably, disrupting TGFβ signaling decreased the DNA binding activity of DNA methyltransferase DNMT1, suggesting that failure to maintain methylation of newly synthesized DNA was the likely cause of DNA demethylation. Together, our findings reveal a hyperactive TGFβ-TGFβR-Smad2 signaling axis needed to maintain epigenetic silencing of critical EMT genes and breast cancer progression. Cancer Res; 70(3); 968-78. ©2010 AACR.

Promoter DNA methylation status of six genes in samples derived from 27 bronchial epithelial cells and matching blood samples from 22 former/current smokers and five nonsmokers as well as 49 primary non^small cell lung cancer samples with corresponding blood controls was determined using methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Lung tumor tissues showed a significantly higher frequency of promoter DNA methylation in p16, MGMT, and DAPK (P < 0.05; Fisher's exact test). p16 promoter DNA methylation in tumors was observed at consistently higher levels when compared with all the other samples analyzed (P = 0.001; Fisher's exact test). ECAD and DAPK exhibited statistically insignificant differences in their levels of DNA methylation among the tumors and bronchial epithelial cells from the smokers. Interestingly, similar levels of methylation were observed in bronchial epithelial cells and corresponding blood from smokers for all four genes (ECAD, p16, MGMT, and DAPK) that showed smoking/lung cancer^associated methylation changes. In summary, our data suggest that targeted DNA methylation silencing of ECAD and DAPK occurs in the early stages and that of p16 and MGMT in the later stages of lung cancer progression. We also provide preliminary evidence that peripheral lymphocytes could potentially be used as a surrogate for bronchial epithelial cells to detect altered DNA methylation in smokers.Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, accounting for 28% of all cancer deaths and f157,200 deaths every year (1). Unfortunately, 36% of nonsmall cell lung cancer cases are detected at an advanced stage often after micrometastasis has developed, leading to an alarmingly low 5-year survival rate of only 14.9% (1). Because nearly 87% of lung cancer cases are due to smoking, yet only 10% of smokers develop lung cancer, it may be worthwhile to screen for susceptible individuals to administer effective preventive measures (1, 2). Thus, the establishment of a combination of early diagnostic markers that could be analyzed in clinical samples obtained using relatively noninvasive procedures could become an asset to efficient detection of changes in preneoplastic tissue before tumor formation and metastasis can occur.Differential DNA methylation at CpG islands has been associated with regulation of gene expression and is essential for normal development, X-chromosome inactivation, imprinting, suppression of parasitic DNA sequences, and cancer (3 -5). Aberrant differential methylation of CpG islands in the promoter region of genes that are implicated in different roles including carcinogen activation or detoxification (CYP1A1 and GSTP1), tumor suppression (p14, p15, p16, p73, APC, and BRCA1), DNA repair (hMLH1 and MGMT), and metastasis and invasion (CDH1, ECAD, TIMP1, and DAPK) occurs in several cancers, including lung cancer (3 -10). Thus, the DNA methylation status of critical genes is not only ideal for use as diagnostic markers but also as therapeutic targets for lung cancer. In this study, we chose to a...

Metastatic dissemination of breast cancer cells represents a significant clinical obstacle to curative therapy. The loss of function of metastasis suppressor genes is a major rate-limiting step in breast cancer progression that prevents the formation of new colonies at distal sites. However, the discovery of new metastasis suppressor genes in breast cancer using genomic efforts has been slow, potentially due to their primary regulation by epigenetic mechanisms. Here, we report the use of model cell lines with the same genetic lineage for the identification of a novel metastasis suppressor gene, serum deprivation response (SDPR), localized to 2q32-33, a region reported to be associated with significant loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer. In silico metaanalysis of publicly available gene expression datasets suggests that the loss of expression of SDPR correlates with significantly reduced distant-metastasis–free and relapse-free survival of breast cancer patients who underwent therapy. Furthermore, we found that stable SDPR overexpression in highly metastatic breast cancer model cell lines inhibited prosurvival pathways, shifted the balance of Bcl-2 family proteins in favor of apoptosis, and decreased migration and intravasation/extravasation potential, with a corresponding drastic suppression of metastatic nodule formation in the lungs of NOD/SCID mice. Moreover, SDPR expression is silenced by promoter DNA methylation, and as such it exemplifies epigenetic regulation of metastatic breast cancer progression. These observations highlight SDPR as a potential prognostic biomarker and a target for future therapeutic applications.

The superinduction of spermidine/spermine N 1 -acetyltransferase (SSAT) gene has been associated with a cytotoxic response to a new class of antineoplastic polyamine analogues. The initial mechanism of SSAT superinduction is an increase in transcription in response to analogue exposure. This increased transcription appears to be modulated through the association between a nuclear protein factor and a cis-element described here as the polyamine-responsive element (PRE). The PRE was identified as a 9-base pair sequence, 5-TATGACTAA-3, in the context of a 31-base pair stretch from -1522 to -1492 base pairs with respect to the SSAT transcriptional start site. This element binds a nuclear factor from polyamine analogue-responsive cells, but not from polyamine analogue-insensitive cells. The labeled PRE was used to clone and identify the transcription factor, Nrf-2, that binds constitutively to the PRE sequence. Although the PRE sequence shares homology to the originally identified Nrf-2 recognition sequence, the two sequences are not identical. The Nrf-2 transcription factor appears only to be present in cell types that are capable of expressing high amounts of SSAT. The results of these studies suggest that Nrf-2, bound to the PRE, plays an important regulatory role of expression of the human SSAT gene.The requirement for polyamines in growth and development is absolute in eukaryotic cells (1). Although this requirement has been well established, some of the precise molecular functions of the polyamines have only recently been elucidated. Several newly synthesized polyamine analogues have been examined for their potential as antitumor agents (2-4). These compounds have been designed to alter the regulation of polyamine metabolism and interfere with the normal functions of polyamines in tumor cells. Some of these compounds appear to act in an association with an ability to superinduce the expression of spermidine/spermine N 1 -acetyltransferase (SSAT), 1 the rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine catabolism (5-7). The superinduction of SSAT has been associated with a phenotypespecific sensitivity to some of the antitumor polyamine analogues, and there are several reports demonstrating superinduction of SSAT and tumor cell toxicity (8 -13). Therefore, there is considerable interest in elucidating the mechanisms that differentiate sensitive tumors from analogue-insensitive tumors and normal tissue.Control of the analogue-mediated superinduction of SSAT is initiated at the level of transcription (14, 15). The -fold induction of SSAT transcription by analogue exposure is relatively small (2-7-fold) compared with the ultimate induction of enzyme activity; however, this increased transcription is necessary for the downstream events, which can result in Ͼ1000-fold increases in SSAT activity (8,16,17). Here we identify a cis-element in the 5Ј regulatory region of the human SSAT and define it as a polyamine-responsive element (PRE). Further, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) results demonstrate that the PRE is bound by a...

High frequency of chromosomal deletions elicited as losses of heterozygosity is a hallmark of genomic instability in cancer. Functional losses of tumor suppressor genes caused by loss of heterozygosity at defined regions during clonal selection for growth advantage define the minimally lost regions as their likely locations on chromosomes. Loss of heterozygosity is elicited at the molecular or cytogenetic level as a deletion, a gene conversion, single or double homologous and nonhomologous mitotic recombinations, a translocation, chromosome breakage and loss, chromosomal fusion or telomeric end-to-end fusions, or whole chromosome loss with or without accompanying duplication of the retained chromosome. Because of the high level of specificity, loss of heterozygosity has recently become invaluable as a marker for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. The molecular defects for the occurrence of loss of heterozygosity are derived from disabled caretaker genes, which protect the integrity of DNA, or chromosome segregator genes, which mediate faithful chromosome disjunction.