281 Background: While EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the NCCN-recommended first-line (1L) therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) with EGFR mutation (EGFRm), many pts initiate immunotherapy (IO) + chemotherapy (chemo) prior to receiving EGFRm test results. This study assessed clinical outcomes associated with initiating EGFR-TKI vs other therapies in stage IV EGFRm NSCLC. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in adults with stage IV EGFRm NSCLC who initiated 1L EGFR-TKI, IO (+ chemo), or chemo alone from 5/2017-12/2018, using Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record data. Treatment patterns were characterized with respect to timing of EGFRm test results. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the median duration of therapy (DoT) and time to next therapy (TTNT), as proxies for progression-free survival. Adjusted hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) representing the effect of 1L therapy on the risk of discontinuing treatment or death (DoT) and the risk of initiating second-line therapy or death (TTNT) were reported from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models controlling for differences in demographics, smoking history, histology, cancer stage, ECOG score, NCI index, time from diagnosis to 1L initiation, and year of 1L initiation, across treatment arms. Results: Among 593 study pts, mean age was 67.5 years and 65.4% were female. EGFR-TKI was used as 1L therapy for 77.2% of pts (n=458), IO in 13.3% (n=79) and chemo in 9.4% (n=56). 7.2% of EGFR-TKI pts, 54.4% of IO pts, and 57.1% of chemo pts initiated 1L before receiving EGFRm test results. Compared to pts on IO and chemo, pts on EGFR-TKI had longer median DoT (EGFR-TKI: 8.7 months [mo]; IO: 4.8 mo; chemo: 3.0 mo, p<0.01) and median TTNT (EGFR-TKI: 12.3 mo; IO: 6.5 mo; chemo: 4.0 mo, p<0.01). Adjusted analyses showed that compared to pts on IO or chemo, pts on EGFR-TKI had significantly lower risk of discontinuing therapy or death (DoT) and initiating second-line therapy or death (TTNT) (Table). Conclusions: Substantial numbers of pts initiated IO + chemo in 1L and EGFR-TKI was associated with better clinical outcomes than IO + chemo, suggesting the importance of adhering to NCCN-recommended therapy for stage IV EGFRm NSCLC pts. [Table: see text]
Background: Endometriosis is a common gynecologic disorder that affects approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. It is also a well-established risk factor for ovarian cancer. Whether hormonal-related and other risk factors for ovarian cancer (e.g., parity, oral contraceptive use) are the same for women with and without endometriosis is currently unknown. Methods: We pooled questionnaire information from 10 population-based case-control studies participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Data from 8,172 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and 12,464 controls were included in our analysis. Associations of body mass index (BMI), parity, oral contraceptive use, breastfeeding, menopausal hormone therapy use, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, tubal ligation, and hysterectomy with risk of ovarian cancer were stratified by history of endometriosis and analyzed using logistic regression. All models were conditioned on age, race/ethnicity, education, and OCAC study site. We fit an endometriosis interaction term for each risk factor to evaluate statistical interactions. Results: Among women with no history of endometriosis, those who had hysterectomies showed a 12% increased risk of ovarian cancer compared to those with intact uteri (OR=1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24); an increased risk was not observed among women with endometriosis (OR=0.74, 95% CI 0.53-1.05; p-interaction=0.009). Use of estrogen-progestin hormone therapy was associated with decreased risk ovarian cancer for women with histories of endometriosis (OR=0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.02), but not for those without endometriosis (OR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.07; p-interaction=0.02). We did not observe any significant statistical interactions for the other risk factors considered, and no interactions were significant after consideration of multiple comparisons. Conclusions: The associations of hysterectomy and menopausal estrogen-progestin hormone therapy use with risk of ovarian cancer seemed to differ by endometriosis status, suggesting interactions that may need to be considered in ovarian cancer risk profiling strategies. Future investigations into the biology underlying these interactions would be relevant. Citation Format: Aruna Muthukumar, Lilah Khoja, Penelope M. Webb, Harvey Risch, Jennifer Doherty, Holly Harris, Marc Goodman, Roberta Ness, Francesmary Modugno, Susanne K. Kjaer, Allan Jensen, Joellen Schildkraut, Andrew Berchuck, Kathryn L. Terry, Daniel Cramer, Linda J. Titus, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Anna H. Wu, Malcolm C. Pike, Celeste L. Pearce, Alice W. Lee. Are ovarian cancer risk factors different for women with endometriosis? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B32.
e19345 Background: While epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the NCCN-recommended first-line (1L) therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) with EGFR mutation (EGFRm), many pts initiate immunotherapy (IO) + chemotherapy (chemo) prior to receiving EGFRm test results. This study assessed clinical outcomes associated with initiating EGFR-TKI vs other therapies in stage IV EGFRm NSCLC. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in adult pts with stage IV EGFRm NSCLC who initiated 1L EGFR-TKI, IO (+ chemo), or chemo alone from 5/2017-12/2018, using data from Flatiron Health. Treatment patterns were characterized with respect to timing of EGFRm test results. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the median duration of therapy (mDoT) and time to next therapy (mTTNT), as proxies for progression-free survival. Adjusted hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) representing the effect of 1L therapy on the risk of discontinuing treatment or death (DoT) and risk of initiating second-line therapy or death (TTNT) were reported from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models controlling for differences in demographics, smoking history, histology, cancer stage, ECOG score, NCI index, and year of and time from diagnosis to 1L initiation, across treatment arms. Results: Among 593 study pts, mean age was 67.5 years and 65.4% were female. EGFR-TKI was used as 1L therapy for 77.2% of pts (n=458), IO in 13.3% (n=79) and chemo alone in 9.4% (n=56). 7.2% of EGFR-TKI pts, 54.4% of IO pts, and 57.1% of chemo pts initiated 1L before receiving EGFRm test results. Compared to pts on IO and chemo alone, pts on EGFR-TKI had longer mDoT (EGFR-TKI: 8.7 months [mo]; IO: 4.8 mo; chemo alone: 3.0 mo, p<0.01) and mTTNT (EGFR-TKI: 12.3 mo; IO: 6.5 mo; chemo alone: 4.0 mo, p<0.01). After adjustment, pts on EGFR-TKI vs pts on IO or chemo alone had significantly lower risk of discontinuing therapy or death (DoT) and initiating second-line therapy or death (TTNT) (see Table). Conclusions: A substantial number of stage IV EGFRm NSCLC pts initiated IO or chemo alone in 1L and EGFR-TKI was associated with better clinical outcomes than IO or chemo alone, highlighting the importance of adhering to NCCN-recommended therapy for these pts. [Table: see text]
Background: Limited information is available about treatments and clinical outcomes among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) whose tumors harbor DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations. Methods: This retrospective chart review study included men diagnosed with mCRPC with ≥1 DDR mutation detected by tumor comprehensive genomic profiling who began a line of therapy on or after July 1, 2014, at oncology centers in the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) consortium. The index date was the initiation of a new therapy in this period, in patients who developed castration-resistant disease and progressed while receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Data on all available lines of therapy post-index were collected. Outcomes reported include time to treatment discontinuation for any reason (TTTD) and overall survival (OS), which were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results for tumor response-related endpoints are forthcoming. Results: A total of 138 patients with mCRPC met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at index was 68 years, and 76% of patients were White. The median follow-up time was 27.1, 15.9, 11.3, and 9.4 months for 1L, 2L, 3L, and 4L+ therapy, respectively. Common sites of metastases included bone (74%), lymph nodes (69%), and lungs (10%). Common tumor DDR mutations included CDK12 (48%), BRCA2 (23%), ATM (21%), and BRCA1 (8%). Assessment of germline mutations was conducted in 114 (83%) patients; the most common was BRCA2 (8%). First-line (1L) treatment information was available for 119 (86%) patients, 2L for 101 (73%), and 3L for 75 (54%) patients. Novel hormonal therapy (NHT; 55%) and taxane chemotherapy (20%) were most common in 1L. Enzalutamide (35%) and abiraterone acetate (14%) were the most frequently used NHTs. Compared to 1L, the proportion of patients receiving NHTs was lower in 2L (33%) and 3L (17%), while the proportion of patients receiving taxanes was higher (36% in 2L and 31% in 3L). In 3L, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors were used in 21% of patients. Median TTTD was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2, 7.2) in 1L, 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.0, 4.6) in 2L, and 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.3, 4.7) in 3L. Median OS was 36.3 months (95% CI: 30.7, 47.8) from the start of 1L, 21.1 months (95% CI: 15.6, 29.3) from the start of 2L, and 14.1 months (95% CI: 9.5, 20.5) from the start of 3L. Conclusions: These findings provide real-world insights about treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with mCRPC harboring DDR mutations. Such insight may provide a helpful benchmark for research aimed at improving clinical outcomes, particularly in later lines of therapy. Citation Format: David B. Solit, Niharika B. Mettu, Shannon J. McCall, Mallika Dhawan, Priyanka J. Bobbili, Maral DerSarkissian, Jasmina Ivanova, Bhakti Arondekar, Jane Chang, Alexander Niyazov, Jocelyn Lee, Risha Huq, Michelle Green, Michelle Turski, Aruna Muthukumar, Tracy Guo, Mei Sheng Duh, William K. Oh. Treatment patterns and overall survival among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring DDR mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 930.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.