I I.-Cy a? LO ccwonc. By REGINALD WILLIAM LANE CLARKE and ARTHUR LAPWORTH. ALTHOUGH carvone and its dihydro-derivative only differ inasmuch as the six-carbon ring in the former contains an et.hylenic linking, the products which their hydrobromides yield by loss of hydrogen bromide under the influence of alkalis are quite different in structure, as carone contains a three-carbon and a six-carbon ring, whilst neither nucleus is present in eucarvone, which appears to contain only one seven-membered ring (Wallach, Annulen, 1905, 339, 94, e t sep.). The explanation of the formation of eucarvone which most naturally suggests itself is the one indicated by Wallach, namely, that in the first stage of the action of potassium hydroxide on carvone hydrobromide, halogen hydride is removed in the same manner as in the case of dihydrocarvone hydrobromide, but that the molecule of the resulting compound is less stable than that of carone, owing to the additional strain produced by the ethylenic linking, and consequently the cyczopropane ring is a t once resolved, but between the two carbon atoms which previously formed part of the six-ring of the carvone hydrobromide ; hitherto, however, no direct evidence confirming this idea has been forthcoming Had it
UNTIL four years ago, data for the proportions in which isomerides are simultaneously formed in aromatic hydrogen-substitutions contributed the only direct, quantitative experimental basis for the numerous theories of the process which had at various times been advanced. At the period mentioned the broad lines of the modern view had been laid down; and not only was this view no exception t o the preceding statement, but also many theoretical details which have subsequently been filled in have arisen from the determination of further d.ata of the same type. I n 1927, however, the view that continued development of the theory would require the consideration, not only of proportions of isomerides, but also of relative velocities of substitution, led to the publication of Part I (Ingold and Shaw, J., 1927, 2918), in which data of the latter kind were submitted for a number of benzene derivatives having single orienting substituents of widely differing structural types.Proportions of isomerides, which are also ratios of their rates of formation,? are regarded as giving only the ratios of magnitudes which individually relate t o the effect of the substituent on reactivity at the different nuclear positions. The speed of total substitution relatively to that of benzene, in short, the " reduced " velocity of substitution, yields the sum of such magnitudes. Only when both the ratios and the sum are known can the individual effects be defined, and the influence of the substituent on nuclear reactivity ROTHSTEIN, arid DENIS WARD. * The first of these studies, called Part I in the text, was published in another series under the specific title " A n Attempt further to define the Probable Mechanism of Aromatic Substitution." -f This is true provided that the simultaneous substitutions are reactions of the same order and are irreversible, which are the conditions contemplated ; it is known that normally these conditions are fulfilled for nuclear nitration and halogenation.
OF the various types of isomeric change, that which involves a change of position of one hydrogen atom only, as in a simple desmotropic change, would, for various reasons, appear to be the most simple, and probably the most easy to investigate.We do not intend to review the many important contributions already made to this subject, in particular since such a course would involve, for the most part, a repetition of much with which Lowry has somemhat recently dealt in his suggestive paper on mutarotation and
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.