The abundance of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) found in homes depends on many factors such as emissions, ventilation and the oxidative environment and these are evolving over time, reflecting changes in chemical use, behaviour and building design/materials. The concentrations of VOCs in 25 UK homes of varying ages, design and occupancy were quantified using continuous indoor air sampling over five days. Air was collected through low flow (1 mL min) constant flow restrictors into evacuated 6 L internally silica-treated canisters until the canisters reached atmospheric pressure. This was followed by thermal desorption-gas chromatography and high mass accuracy time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TD-GC-TOF/MS). A fully quantitative analysis was performed on the eight most abundant hydrocarbon-based VOCs found. Despite differences in building characteristics and occupant numbers 94% of the homes had d-limonene or α-pinene as the most abundant VOCs. The variability seen across the 25 homes in concentrations of monoterpenes indoors was considerably greater than that of species such as isoprene, benzene, toluene and xylenes. The variance in VOCs indoors appeared to be strongly influenced by occupant activities such as cleaning with 5-day average concentrations of d-limonene ranging from 18 μg m to over 1400 μg m, a peak domestic value that is possibly the highest yet reported in the literature.
Dementia is an umbrella term for a range of conditions that affect how the brain works and, in particular, the ability to remember, think and reason. It mainly affects older people, both men and women, and gets worse over time. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the possibility that exposure to outdoor air pollution could increase the risk of dementia. COMEAP reviewed epidemiological and experimental studies and concluded that it is likely that air pollution contributes to a decline in mental ability and dementia in older people. The most likely way this occurs is through effects on the circulatory system. It is known that air pollutants, particularly fine particles, can affect the heart and blood vessels, including those of the brain. These effects are linked to vascular dementia, which is caused by damage to the blood vessels in the brain. Experimental studies suggest that air pollution may also stimulate immune cells in the brain, which can then damage nerve cells. It is also likely that some nano-sized (ultrafine) particles can enter the brain, either by transport along the olfactory nerve or by entering the circulation and crossing the blood-brain barrier. These particles may cause direct damage. Nonetheless, based on the available evidence, it does not seem likely that this is an important mechanism for the development of dementia. Recommendations were made for further research which would help develop the evidence on this important topic.
Statement from the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants (COMEAP) on the differential toxicity of particulate matter according to source or constituents
Particulate matter in outdoor air comes from a wide range of different sources and contains many different chemical components. Understanding which of these sources and components are particularly harmful would help to focus policies and interventions to reduce impacts on health. COMEAP recently (July 2022) published an updated statement on this topic, drawing on recent reviews of the available evidence. It noted that particulate matter, and constituents of particulate matter, associated with combustion and road traffic have received the most research attention. However, there was insufficient coherence in the epidemiological evidence to conclude that these sources of particulate matter play a significantly greater role in the health effects of particulate air pollution than other sources or constituents. A comprehensive review of the evidence reveals that toxicity has been attributed to a wide variety of constituents and sources, possibly acting by a number of different mechanisms. However, the complexity of sources, sizes and chemical composition of particulate matter makes it extremely difficult to identify which characteristics of particles might make them less harmful or more toxic than others. Future research assessing the influence of chemical composition of particulate matter should offer greater insights into toxicity. But, at present, PM2.5 (the mass concentration of fine particulate matter in air) remains the most suitable metric for evaluating health impacts and regulating particulate air pollution.
The Environment Act (2021) requires the government to set at least one long-term air-quality target, as well as a target for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution. COMEAP provided independent expert advice to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to inform the development of targets to reduce both the annual average (mean) concentration of PM2.5 in ambient air and long term population exposures. COMEAP’s advice includes that: a focus on reducing long-term average concentrations of PM2.5 is appropriate evidence indicates that PM2.5 pollution can have harmful effects on people’s health at low concentrations reducing concentrations to, or below, the World Health Organization’s new Air Quality Guideline (5 µg/m3) would benefit public health available studies have not indicated a threshold of effect below which there is no harm reducing exposure of the whole population would achieve the greatest overall public health benefit some individuals or groups are more at risk, but it might be difficult to reflect this in a national targets framework the health benefits of reducing other pollutants, such as nitrogen dioxide and ozone, should not be overlooked. In response to Defra’s evidence report explaining the rationale for its proposed targets, COMEAP: recommended that Defra should consider roles in continuing to improve air quality, even where legally binding targets are met suggested that interim targets would be important to ensure early progress and maximise health benefits stressed the importance of considering inequalities noted that international engagement will be required
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.