Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Der ärztliche Nachwuchs hat disruptive Effekte und macht auch vor dem Fach Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe nicht halt. Noch fokussiert sich der Diskurs auf die Generation Y (1980–1994). Um dem Nachwuchs ein konstruktives Arbeitsumfeld zu bieten, drängt die Zeit. Es gilt, sich dessen Anforderungen an ein solches zu vergegenwärtigen. Zielsetzung Erfassen des Stimmungsbilds des ärztlichen Nachwuchses in der Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe mit anschließender Ableitung praxisrelevanter Aspekte unter Berücksichtigung der künftig dominierenden Generation Z (1995–2009). Methoden Von Januar bis Oktober 2021 wurde eine deskriptive Querschnittserhebung des ärztlichen Nachwuchses ausbildender Kliniken im Fach Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe durchgeführt. Es wurden 81 Fragen zu 6 Themen online abgefragt. Ergebnis Ausgewertet wurden 122 Fragebögen (n = 122): 28 % (n = 33) schätzen die Arbeitsbelastung als sehr hoch, 56 % (n = 67) als hoch ein. Zwei Drittel (n = 81) arbeiten wöchentlich 40–59 h. Den Anteil delegierbarer Tätigkeiten beziffern 67 % (n = 80) auf > 25 %. 88 % (n = 105) verbringen 25–75 % der täglichen Arbeitszeit mit Dokumentieren. 92 % (n = 109) wünschen sich regelmäßige Ober- bzw. Chefarztvisiten, 81 % (n = 95) beurteilen die Weiterbildung schlechter als gut. Für 32 % (n = 38) besteht ein ausgeglichenes Verhältnis zwischen Gesundheit und Beruf, 25 % (n = 29) beurteilen die Arbeitsbedingungen als familienfreundlich, und 88 % (n = 102) wären bereit, bei anhaltender Unzufriedenheit den Arbeitgeber zu wechseln. Schlussfolgerung Den Nachwuchs dominieren Forderungen nach Weiterbildung, Teilzeit, Sinnhaftigkeit, Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf, Wertschätzung und Selbstfürsorge. Lösungskonzepte, um diesen gerecht zu werden, stünden zur Verfügung.
Purpose To evaluate the timing of antenatal steroid administration and associated medical interventions in women with imminent preterm birth. Methods We performed a prospective observational study at a single tertiary center in Germany from September 2018 to August 2019. We included pregnant women who received antenatal steroids for imminent preterm birth and evaluated the interval from administration to birth. 120 women with antenatal steroid application were included into our analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze factors influencing the timing of antenatal steroids and to evaluate additional medical interventions which women with imminent preterm birth experience. Results Of the 120 women included into our study, 35.8% gave birth before 34/0 weeks and 64.2% before 37/0 weeks of gestation. Only 25/120 women (20.8%) delivered within the optimal time window of 1–7 days after antenatal steroid application. 5/120 women (4.2%) only received one dose of antenatal steroids before birth and 3/120 (2.5%) gave birth within 8 to 14 days after antenatal steroids. Most women gave birth more than 14 days after steroid application (72.5%, 87/120). Women with preeclampsia (60%), PPROM (31%), and FGR (30%) had the highest rates of delivery within the optimal time window. Women of all timing groups received additional interventions and medications like antibiotics, tocolytics, or anticoagulation. Conclusion Our observational data indicate that most pregnant women do not give birth within 7 days after the administration of antenatal steroids. The timing was best for preterm birth due to preeclampsia, PPROM, and FGR. Especially for women with symptoms of preterm labor and bleeding placenta previa, antenatal steroids should be indicated more restrictively to improve neonatal outcome and reduce untimely and unnecessary interventions.
For 300 years now, obstetrics has drawn on the concept of simulation training to not only teach anatomy and physiology theoretically, but to literally infuse it practically. In an 18th century scientific culture, which was predominantly patriarchal, the French royal midwife Angelique Marguerite Le Boursier du Coudray excelled in this field. Using La Machine, one of the first obstetric phantoms, she taught thousands of midwives and even physicians. The exponential increase in publications on obstetric simulations in recent years continues to underline their current relevance, and Madame du Coudray was once at the forefront with her mannequin, probably the most sophisticated phantom of its time, a symbiosis of practical-robust architecture and anatomical-theoretical accuracy. In retrospect, it is therefore worthwhile to take a closer look at this pioneer and her obstetric phantoms, applied in the first national simulation-based training course, and to evaluate them in the overall picture of the development of anatomically correct replicas for practice-oriented training with detailed, flexible exercise – back to the roots.
In clinical practice, neither SD-OCT nor US ensure an explicit finding of sRS in each eye with sRS. However, both methods positively complement one another and together they improve image-based diagnosis. All stages of PVD may be found in eyes with sRS. The contribution of the vitreous to the pathogenesis of sRS remains uncertain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.