The karyology was studied in nine species of Antilopinae and evaluated with regard to cytotaxonomic relations within the subfamily. Karyotypes of three of these species were previously undescribed. Chromosomes were examined by conventional staining methods, G-, C-, and T-banding techniques, and by autoradiography. Evolutionary differentiation of karyotypes in this group is characterized by extensive Robertsonian fusions and a particular translocation between the X chromosome and an autosome. With comparison of Giemsa-banding patterns a taxonomy has been constructed which differs most markedly from the classical taxonomy in two aspects : the blackbuck, Antilope cervicapra, shows a strong karyotypic affinity to gazelles of the subgenus Nanger; Thomson's gazelle, Gazella thomsoni, lacks the numerous Robertsonian fusions and the X-autosome translocation common to other members of Gazella studied to date. Cases of intraspecific polymorphism of chromosome morphology and number are presented.

G- and C-banded karyotypes of Damaliscus hunteri, D. lunatus and D. pygargus were compared using the standard karyotype of Bos taurus. Chromosomal complements were 2n = 36 in D. lunatus jimela, 2n = 38 in D. pygargus phillipsi and D. p. pygargus, and 2n = 44 in D. hunteri. The fundamental number in all karyotypes was 60. Among the three species of Damaliscus, seven autosomal pairs and the X chromosomes were conserved. Y-chromosome differences were attributed to heterochromatic additions or deletions. Banded karyotypes of the two subspecies of D. pygargus exhibited complete homology. Chromosomal complements of D. pygargus and D. lunatus differed by a simple centric fusion. However, karyotypes of D. pygargus and D. lunatus differed from D. hunteri by numerous centric fusions, several of which were related by monobrachial chain complexes. Between the karyotypes of D. hunteri and D. pygargus or D. lunatus, there were two chain complexes, one involving five chromosomes (chain V) and the other involving 12 in pygargus (chain XII) or 13 in lunatus (chain XIII). There were also two simple centric fusions between D. hunteri and D. lunatus/D. pygargus; acrocentric chromosomes 13, 15, 20 and 22 in D hunteri were fused as 13;15 and 20;22 in D. lunatus and D. pygargus.

Q-band comparisons were made among representative species of the four genera of the tribe Bovini (Bos, Bison, Bubalus, Syncerus) as well as to selected outgroup taxa representing the remaining two tribes of the subfamily Bovinae (nilgai, Boselaphini; eland, Tragelphini), the Bovidae subfamily Caprinae (domestic sheep) and the family Cervidae (sika deer and white-tailed deer). Extensive autosomal arm homologies were noted, but relatively few derivative character states were shared. Focus was then made on variation of the sex chromosomes and the chromosomal distribution of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs). Bovine BAC clones were used in molecular cytogenetic analyses to decipher rearrangements of the sex chromosomes, and a pocket gopher 28s ribosomal probe was used to map the chromosomal locations of nucleolar organizing regions (NORs). Some of the more noteworthy conclusions drawn from the comparative analysis were that: 1. The Bovidae ancestral X chromosome was probably acrocentric and similar to acrocentric X chromosomes of the Bovinae; 2. The domestic sheep acrocentric X is probably a derivative character state that unites non-Bovinae subfamilies; 3. Bos and Bison are united within the tribe Bovini by the presence of shared derivative submetacentric X chromosomes; 4. Sika and white-tailed deer X chromosomes differ by inversion from X chromosomes of the Bovinae; 5. The Bovini ancestral Y chromosome was probably a small acrocentric; 6. Bos taurus, B. gaurus and B. banteng share derivative metacentric Y chromosomes; 7. Syncerus and Bubalus are united by the acquisition of X-specific repetitive DNA sequence on their Y chromosomes; 8. Bovinae and Cervidae X chromosome centromere position varies without concomitant change in locus order. Preliminary data indicate that a knowledge of the chromosomal distribution of NORs among the Bovidae will prove to be phylogenetically informative.

Twenty-six captive individuals of the ellipsiprymnus subspecies group of Kobus ellipsiprymnus were found to have chromosomal complements of 2n = 50-52 (FN = 61-62), and 26 of the defassa subspecies group, including three specimens from Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya, had complements of 2n = 53-54 (FN = 62). G-banded karyotypes that were numbered according to the standard karyotype of Bos taurus revealed that variation in diploid number was the result of polymorphism for two independent centric (Robertsonian) fusions. The ellipsiprymnus group was polymorphic for a 7;11 centric fusion. Both elements of chromosome pairs 7 and 11 were fused in fusion homozygotes (2n = 50); in fusion heterozygotes (2n = 51), only one element of each pair was fused. The 7;11 fusion was lacking in specimens with 2n = 52. The defassa group was polymorphic for a 6;18 centric fusion; individuals were either heterozygous for the fusion (2n = 53) or lacking it (2n = 54). There were no defassa group individuals that were homozygous for the 6;18 fusion (2n = 52), but this may be a sampling artifact. The 6;18 fusion was fixed in the ellipsiprymnus group, whereas the 7;11 fusion was absent in the defassa group. In G- and C-banded karyotypes, all autosomal arms and the X chromosomes of the two subspecies groups appeared to be completely homologous. However, the Y chromosome was acrocentric in the ellipsiprymnus group and submetacentric in the defassa group, possibly the result of a pericentric inversion. Fixed chromosomal differences between the two subspecies groups reflect a period of supposed geographic isolation during which time they diverged genetically and phenotypically, and the centric fusion polymorphisms raise the possibility of reduced fertility in hybrids. These data, in conjunction with phenotypic and mitochondrial DNA data, suggest to us that populations of the ellipsiprymnus and defassa groups should be managed separately.

The proposition is examined that cytogenetic studies are needed in the conservation of wild captive animals. Several cases of polymorphic species have hybridized to produce infertile offspring. In several gazelle species, this accidental hybridization among look-alike animals has led to the extinction of zoo populations. The suggestion that this is always the result of inbreeding is thus erroneous. Cytogenetic study is also needed in animals that are destined for reintroduction, as accidental release of chromosomally different species is counterproductive to the reestablishment of wild stock. Several examples of mammalian species that have flourished from an extremely small founder stock are here examined to draw attention to the possibility that "inbreeding" is not invariably disadvantageous. The karyotypes of two hybridizing Kobus species with divergent chromosomal numbers are described.