Background The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is debated. Melphalan as a perfusion agent has also demonstrated survival benefit in other recurrent and chemoresistant malignancies. Thus, we hypothesize that melphalan as a HIPEC agent may improve overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with PC from CRC. Methods A retrospective review of a prospective database of 48 patients who underwent optimal CRS (CC-0/1) and HIPEC from 2001-2016 was performed. Nineteen had CRS/HIPEC with melphalan (group I) and 29 with mitomycin-C (group II). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Perioperative variables were compared. Results Mean age at CRS/HIPEC was 53±10 years. Median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 17 vs 13 in groups I and II, respectively (p=0.86). PCI≥20 occurred in 9 (47%) and 13 (45%) patients in groups I and II, respectively. Positive lymph nodes were identified in 8/19 (42%) vs 12/29 (41%) in groups I and II, respectively (p=0.73). Multivariate analysis identified PCI≥20 as a predictive factor of survival (HR: 7.5). Median OS in groups I and II was 36 and 28 months, respectively (p=0.54). Median PFS in groups I and II was 10 and 20 months, respectively (p=0.05). Conclusions CRS/HIPEC with MMC had longer median PFS in PC from CRC. PCI≥20 was the only independent predictive factor for survival. Until longer follow-up is available, we recommend using MMC in CRS/HIPEC for PC from CRC. Further prospective randomized studies are necessary.
4098 Background: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) have become standard of care for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from appendiceal cancer (AC). We reviewed our experience and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of 614 CRS/HIPEC procedures from 1998-2016 was performed. Patient characteristics, surgical variables, and postoperative outcomes of first CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Results: Two hundred ninety patients with PC from AC underwent 334 CRS/HIPEC’s. Median age at diagnosis and surgery was 52 (22-79) and 53 (23-81) years, respectively; 65% (187) were female. Prior surgical score was 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 20%, 38%, 37%, and 5%, respectively. Prior systemic chemotherapy was reported in 30% of patients. Median time from diagnosis to CRS/HIPEC was 4 months (0-182). Pre-operative tumor markers (CEA, CA-125, CA-19-9) were positive in 48% with one, two, and three positive markers in 21%, 15%, and 13% patients, respectively. Median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 29. Mitomycin-C was the HIPEC agent of choice. Mean operative time was 10 hours (R: 4-19) and median length of stay was 10 days (R: 4-93). Histology included 59% (171) peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA), 41% (119) disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM). Lymph nodes were positive in 47% PMCA. Complete cytoreduction rate was 87% (84% PMCA, 92% DPAM [p = 0.048]). Grade III-V complications occurred in 21%, with one 30-day mortality (0.3%). Overall, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 84 months with 5-year PFS of 56%. Median PFS was 43 months in PMCA and not reached in DPAM. Five year PFS was 40% PMCA and 82% DPAM (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (MOS) was 139 months with 61% 5-year OS. MOS was 53 months in PMCA and not reached in DPAM. Five year OS was 47% PMCA and 85% DPAM (p < 0.001). At 42-month median follow-up, 68% were alive (92 PMCA/103 DPAM) with 84% disease free (72 PMCA/92 DPAM), 28% died of disease (73 PMCA/7 DPAM). Conclusions: CRS/HIPEC is an effective treatment for patients with PC from AC providing meaningful long term survival in low and high grade tumors and should be considered the standard of care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.