2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-institutional study of peritoneal sarcomatosis from uterine sarcoma treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Although the use of CRS/HIPEC in peritoneal sarcomatosis is controversial, it is considered an important treatment option in multiple centers worldwide. 19 46 Our study suggests that CRS/HIPEC offers a survival advantage in recurrent US without extra-abdominal metastasis. The median OS for our patients undergoing CRS/ HIPEC for recurrent US was 43.8 months (and 3-year OS of 71.4%), compared with 35.9 months (and 3-year OS of 40%) for the conventional surgery group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 Although the use of CRS/HIPEC in peritoneal sarcomatosis is controversial, it is considered an important treatment option in multiple centers worldwide. 19 46 Our study suggests that CRS/HIPEC offers a survival advantage in recurrent US without extra-abdominal metastasis. The median OS for our patients undergoing CRS/ HIPEC for recurrent US was 43.8 months (and 3-year OS of 71.4%), compared with 35.9 months (and 3-year OS of 40%) for the conventional surgery group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Previous studies reported survival outcomes of patients with primary or recurrent US undergoing CRS only, CRS/HIPEC, or systemic chemotherapy; however, comparisons were not made among the different treatment groups. 18,20,44,46,48,49 Because this is a retrospective review based on a small number of cases and from a single institution, it is difficult to derive strong conclusions. Although statistical significance was not achieved, the results suggest that CRS/HIPEC offers a survival advantage in terms of both DFS and OS in recurrent US limited to the abdominal cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in order to maximize the benefits of debulking surgery in cases presenting advanced stage uterine sarcomas with peritoneal involvement, certain authors proposed treatment with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results. Therefore, in the study conducted by surgery in association with intraperitoneal chemotherapy might improve long-term outcomes especially in cases with uterine leiomyosarcoma; unfortunately the types of associated visceral resections were not detailed, therefore, there are no data regarding the necessity of association of urinary tract resections (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies of HIPEC in uterine sarcomatosis are summarized in Table 2 4,25–33 . Cisplatin (CDDP) has been used for many cases even with uterine sarcomatosis as the chemotherapeutic agent of HIPEC because CDDP is one of the most effective and proven chemotherapeutic agents for HIPEC for carcinomatous peritonitis, as we have already mentioned.…”
Section: Current Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the addition of HIPEC has been shown to result in a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients in a meta‐analysis including two phase 3 trials and 11 observational studies in 2019 3 . Growing evidence of the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC has also been reported in uterine sarcoma with peritoneal sarcomatosis in a multi‐institutional study 4 . Therefore, HIPEC could be one of the new therapeutic strategies in such disseminated peritoneal lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%