Introduction Increased mortality has been demonstrated in older adults with COVID-19, but the effect of frailty has been unclear. Methods This multi-centre cohort study involved patients aged 18 years and older hospitalised with COVID-19, using routinely collected data. We used Cox regression analysis to assess the impact of age, frailty, and delirium on the risk of inpatient mortality, adjusting for sex, illness severity, inflammation, and co-morbidities. We used ordinal logistic regression analysis to assess the impact of age, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and delirium on risk of increased care requirements on discharge, adjusting for the same variables. Results Data from 5,711 patients from 55 hospitals in 12 countries were included (median age 74, IQR 54–83; 55.2% male). The risk of death increased independently with increasing age (>80 vs 18–49: HR 3.57, CI 2.54–5.02), frailty (CFS 8 vs 1–3: HR 3.03, CI 2.29–4.00) inflammation, renal disease, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, but not delirium. Age, frailty (CFS 7 vs 1–3: OR 7.00, CI 5.27–9.32), delirium, dementia, and mental health diagnoses were all associated with increased risk of higher care needs on discharge. The likelihood of adverse outcomes increased across all grades of CFS from 4 to 9. Conclusions Age and frailty are independently associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Risk of increased care needs was also increased in survivors of COVID-19 with frailty or older age.
Background Super‐resolution is an emerging method for enhancing MRI resolution; however, its impact on image quality is still unknown. Purpose To evaluate MRI super‐resolution using quantitative and qualitative metrics of cartilage morphometry, osteophyte detection, and global image blurring. Study Type Retrospective. Population In all, 176 MRI studies of subjects at varying stages of osteoarthritis. Field Strength/Sequence Original‐resolution 3D double‐echo steady‐state (DESS) and DESS with 3× thicker slices retrospectively enhanced using super‐resolution and tricubic interpolation (TCI) at 3T. Assessment A quantitative comparison of femoral cartilage morphometry was performed for the original‐resolution DESS, the super‐resolution, and the TCI scans in 17 subjects. A reader study by three musculoskeletal radiologists assessed cartilage image quality, overall image sharpness, and osteophytes incidence in all three sets of scans. A referenceless blurring metric evaluated blurring in all three image dimensions for the three sets of scans. Statistical Tests Mann–Whitney U‐tests compared Dice coefficients (DC) of segmentation accuracy for the DESS, super‐resolution, and TCI images, along with the image quality readings and blurring metrics. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals compared osteophyte detection for the super‐resolution and TCI images, with the original‐resolution as a reference. Results DC for the original‐resolution (90.2 ± 1.7%) and super‐resolution (89.6 ± 2.0%) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than TCI (86.3 ± 5.6%). Segmentation overlap of super‐resolution with the original‐resolution (DC = 97.6 ± 0.7%) was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than TCI overlap (DC = 95.0 ± 1.1%). Cartilage image quality for sharpness and contrast levels, and the through‐plane quantitative blur factor for super‐resolution images, was significantly (P < 0.001) better than TCI. Super‐resolution osteophyte detection sensitivity of 80% (76–82%), specificity of 93% (92–94%), and DOR of 32 (22–46) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than TCI sensitivity of 73% (69–76%), specificity of 90% (89–91%), and DOR of 17 (13–22). Data Conclusion Super‐resolution appears to consistently outperform naïve interpolation and may improve image quality without biasing quantitative biomarkers. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:768–779.
Background Injuries to the articular cartilage in the knee are common in jumping athletes, particularly high‐level basketball players. Unfortunately, these are often diagnosed at a late stage of the disease process, after tissue loss has already occurred. Purpose/Hypothesis To evaluate longitudinal changes in knee articular cartilage and knee function in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) basketball players and their evolution over the competitive season and off‐season. Study Type Longitudinal, multisite cohort study. Population Thirty‐two NCAA Division 1 athletes: 22 basketball players and 10 swimmers. Field Strength/Sequence Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a combined T1ρ and T2 magnetization‐prepared angle‐modulated portioned k‐space spoiled gradient‐echo snapshots (MAPSS) sequence at 3T. Assessment We calculated T2 and T1ρ relaxation times to compare compositional cartilage changes between three timepoints: preseason 1, postseason 1, and preseason 2. Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were used to assess knee health. Statistical Tests One‐way variance model hypothesis test, general linear model, and chi‐squared test. Results In the femoral articular cartilage of all athletes, we saw a global decrease in T2 and T1ρ relaxation times during the competitive season (all P < 0.05) and an increase in T2 and T1ρ relaxation times during the off‐season (all P < 0.05). In the basketball players' femoral cartilage, the anterior and central compartments respectively had the highest T2 and T1ρ relaxation times following the competitive season and off‐season. The basketball players had significantly lower KOOS measures in every domain compared with the swimmers: Pain (P < 0.05), Symptoms (P < 0.05), Function in Daily Living (P < 0.05), Function in Sport/Recreation (P < 0.05), and Quality of Life (P < 0.05). Conclusion Our results indicate that T2 and T1ρ MRI can detect significant seasonal changes in the articular cartilage of basketball players and that there are regional differences in the articular cartilage that are indicative of basketball‐specific stress on the femoral cartilage. This study demonstrates the potential of quantitative MRI to monitor global and regional cartilage health in athletes at risk of developing cartilage problems. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2
ConclusionOur results showed a risk of shorter survival in NUVH compared to PUC. This suggests NUVH as an independent predictor of worse outcomes. As a result, patients with NUVH should be counselled preoperatively that overall and disease-specific outcomes are worse postoperatively and about the possible need for adjuvant treatment.
Background: Deep learning (DL)-based automatic segmentation models can expedite manual segmentation yet require resource-intensive fine-tuning before deployment on new datasets. The generalizability of DL methods to new datasets without fine-tuning is not well characterized. Purpose: Evaluate the generalizability of DL-based models by deploying pretrained models on independent datasets varying by MR scanner, acquisition parameters, and subject population. Study Type: Retrospective based on prospectively acquired data. Population: Overall test dataset: 59 subjects (26 females); Study 1: 5 healthy subjects (zero females), Study 2: 8 healthy subjects (eight females), Study 3: 10 subjects with osteoarthritis (eight females), Study 4: 36 subjects with various knee pathology (10 females). Field Strength/Sequence: A 3-T, quantitative double-echo steady state (qDESS). Assessment: Four annotators manually segmented knee cartilage. Each reader segmented one of four qDESS datasets in the test dataset. Two DL models, one trained on qDESS data and another on Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)-DESS data, were assessed. Manual and automatic segmentations were compared by quantifying variations in segmentation accuracy, volume, and T2 relaxation times for superficial and deep cartilage. Statistical Tests: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation accuracy. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, root-mean-squared error-coefficient-of-variation to quantify manual vs. automatic T2 and volume variations. Bland-Altman plots for manual vs. automatic T2 agreement. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: DSCs for the qDESS-trained model, 0.79-0.93, were higher than those for the OAI-DESS-trained model, 0.59-0.79. T2 and volume CCCs for the qDESS-trained model, 0.75-0.98 and 0.47-0.95, were higher than respective CCCs for the OAI-DESS-trained model, 0.35-0.90 and 0.13-0.84. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement for superficial and deep cartilage T2 were lower for the qDESS-trained model, AE2.4 msec and AE4.0 msec, than the OAI-DESS-trained model, AE4.4 msec and AE5.2 msec. Data Conclusion:The qDESS-trained model may generalize well to independent qDESS datasets regardless of MR scanner, acquisition parameters, and subject population.
In the lesser developed countries of Africa and Asia tuberculosis is widely prevalent in all its various forms and still presents a major health problem. It is therefore not surprising that 20 to 25% of brain tumours prove to be tuberculomas so that this condition is not rare as it is in the West. In this department, which has been functioning now for over five years, more than 95 patients have already undergone operative excision of brain tuberculomas. In a histopathological analysis of 452 intracranial spaceoccupying lesions studied over the past eight and a half years at the Neuropathology Unit (Dastur and Iyer, 1961), 102 or 23% were found to be tuberculomas. The great majority of these have conformed to the types described in standard works on neurology and neuropathology (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.