Background: Healthcare worker (HCW) hand hygiene compliance is key to patient safety; however, compliance is suboptimal. Nevertheless hand hygiene compliance is not well studied in the long-term care setting. Aim: To apply a behaviour change framework, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), to identify modifiable facilitators and barriers for HCW hand hygiene compliance in longterm care settings. Methods: HCW hand hygiene compliance facilitators and barriers were examined using a questionnaire for HCWs from long-term care homes in Ontario, Canada. The questionnaire was informed by the TDF, which is based on a synthesis of constructs from a number of relevant psychological theories of behaviour change. Findings: Barriers identified from the questionnaire aligned with the TDF domain environmental context and resources (time pressure, workload, and environmental controls). Facilitators identified from questionnaire results aligned with the TDF domains social/ professional role and identity (it is what is expected of HCWs), and beliefs about consequences (risk of transmission of microorganisms to self or others). Conclusion: There are several barriers to hand hygiene compliance that persist in long-term care. A behaviour change theory-informed framework such as the TDF can be helpful to identify those barriers. This study identified several key behavioural constructs aligned with the TDF that can be targeted when developing novel hand hygiene interventions.

Occurrence of chylothorax following the Fontan operation can be a marker of poorer medium-term clinical outcomes. It is difficult to predict occurrence of chylothorax owing to its multifactorial nature and involvement of lymphatic compensatory capacity that is unmasked only after the Fontan operation.

No abstract

Primary SL appeared to be associated with a lower incidence and severity of PVO. The primary SL repair eliminated the risk of developing central PVO, although a relatively benign type of peripheral PVO could occur.

PAP obtained from the intraoperative pulmonary flow study is associated with medium-term survival and late RVSP in patients with PA/VSD/MAPCAs. VSD closure for patients with a mean PAP ≥25 mm Hg on a flow study is considered high risk, and sensible judgment and a low threshold for VSD fenestration are required.

Early death in the early era has been overcome. Yet the incidence and causes of late death remain unchanged. There was a strong causative relationship between the mode of Fontan failure/complication and death, indicating the importance of early recognition and treatment of Fontan failure/complication.

Persistent fenestration was a marker for physiologic intolerance as noted by increased rates of mortality and a higher incidence of Fontan failure/complications. The specificity of pre-Fontan physiologic data for fenestration status may not have the fidelity needed for long-term care and thus, the consequences of decision making regarding fenestration status may not be determined until well after the operation.

Objective: Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results may help guide appropriate antibiotic prescribing, particularly for urinary tract infections. Our objective was to describe laboratory urine culture susceptibility reporting practices and to estimate their impact on antibiotic prescribing in outpatients. Methods: We examined all positive urine cultures with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis associated with an antibiotic prescription among outpatients over 65 years of age in Ontario, Canada from 2014 through 2017. We evaluated antibiotic prescribing in the empirical window (1e3 days before culture result) and in the directed window (0e5 days after culture result). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were reported to estimate the association between reporting and prescribing. Results: In total 113 780 eligible urine cultures from 48 laboratories were included in the study cohort. Susceptibility reporting practices were highly variable between laboratories, with a range across antibiotics from norfloxacin (n ¼ 5/48, 10.4% reporting) to nitrofurantoin (n ¼ 40/48, 83.3% reporting). Reporting antibiotic susceptibility was associated with increased odds of prescribing that antibiotic in the directed window (aOR 2.98, 95%CI 2.07e4.28). At the laboratory level, the proportion of urine cultures reporting specific antibiotic susceptibility results was also associated with an increase in prescribing of that antibiotic in the empirical window (adjusted OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.13e1.33, per 25% increase in reporting). Conclusions: Laboratory reporting of antibiotic susceptibility results for urine cultures is associated with empirical and directed prescribing of the reported antibiotics. Laboratories can play an important role in guiding appropriate antibiotic selection for urinary indications.