Background: Fish allergy is the third most common food allergy after milk and egg in parts of Europe, but there is little data about prevalence in South East Asia where it is an important part of regular diets. Objective: We aimed to obtain an estimate of the population prevalence of fish allergy among older children in the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Methods: The population prevalence of fish allergy in 14- to 16-year-old children in the 3 countries was evaluated using a structured written questionnaire which was distributed to students of randomly selected secondary schools. An extended questionnaire to determine convincing fish allergy on the basis of typical clinical manifestations within 2 h of ingestion was administered to those with positive responses. Results: From acohort of 25,842 students, responses were 81.1% in the Philippines (n = 11,434), 67.9% in Singapore (n = 6,498) and 80.2% (n = 2,034) in Thailand. Using criteria for convincing food allergy, fish allergy was much higher in the Philippines [2.29%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02–2.56] than in Singapore (0.26%, 95% CI 0.14–0.79) and Thailand (0.29%, 95% CI 0.06–0.52). Weighted multiple logistic regression analyses showed that compared to the Philippines, prevalence rates were lower in Singapore [odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% CI 0.27–0.60, p < 0.0001] and Thailand (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05–0.33, p < 0.0001). Females were more likely to have fish allergy compared to males for all children combined (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11–1.58, p = 0.002). Most allergies appeared mild, as only 28% of cases sought medical consultation at the time of the reaction and 31.2% of cases reported continued exposure despite allergic symptoms. Conclusion: Fish allergy in late childhood is more common in the Philippines compared to Singapore and Thailand. Differences in food processing, dietary habits and other cultural practices might be important risk factors for the development of fish allergy in these populations.

Preselection of peptides by using in silico and in vitro approaches in combination with conventional methods appears to be an effective strategy for identifying peanut T-cell peptide vaccine candidates.

During the years between 2004 and 2009, asthma severity increased with increasing sensitization to HD, HDM and cockroach. Awareness of these changes and further studies are required.

No abstract

Background Previous studies have shown that direct oral provocation tests, without prior skin testing, in children having delayed onset, benign rashes to beta-lactam antibiotic is safe and effective. Although, this test is useful in confirming drug hypersensitivity reactions, there is no standard protocol recommendation of drug provocation tests. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of the direct oral provocation test, using the Amoxicillin-2-step-challenge without prior skin testing, in children with history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin. Methods The Amoxicillin-2-step-challenge protocol was performed in children with history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin. This protocol is composed of 2 doses of amoxicillin, with a 30-min interval; continued for a total of 5 days. All of the patients had not undergone skin testing before the oral provocation test. Results This study included 54 children, having a median age of 6.6 years, with 70.4% being male. Amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were reported as the culprit drug in 75.9% and 24.1%, respectively. The index reactions were maculopapular (MP) rash in 79.6% and delayed urticarial rash/angioedema in 20.4%. Five patients (9.3%) had a reaction during the provocation test, all of these patients had delayed urticaria and were treated with oral antihistamine. However, 1 patient developed a fever alongside an MP rash. Laboratory investigation for this patient showed increased atypical lymphocytes and liver enzymes elevation. Conclusions Direct oral provocation tests, using the Amoxicillin-2-step-challenge, without prior skin testing, revealed good, immediate safety for the diagnosis of amoxicillin hypersensitivity in children with history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin.

Parent-reported food allergy could put caregivers under high stress, but the OFC test could reduce stress among anxious, over-parenting caregivers. Parent-reported food allergy had no impact on a child's growth in our study.

BLG and casein for cow's milk and ovomucoid and ovalbumin for egg were the common components causing sensitization in cow's milk and egg allergic patients. Among the patients with cow's milk allergy, the level of casein sIgE in the urticaria group tended to be higher than the AD group, and in egg allergic patients, the non-AD group had a significantly higher ovomucoid sIgE level compared with the AD group.

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is reported to be the most common drug hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of self-reported NSAID hypersensitivity and identify patients at high risk of NSAID hypersensitivity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients who presented at a single tertiary care hospital between January–December 2017 with reported NSAID hypersensitivity were evaluated. Clinical information obtained from a review of medical records was further supplemented with data gained from a telephone-administered questionnaire. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From a total of 535 patients with reported NSAID hypersensitivity, 301 were included in the study. The mean age of onset of NSAID hypersensitivity reaction was 30.3 ± 14.9 years old. A total of 84 patients (27.9%) were hypersensitive to 2 or more chemically unrelated NSAIDs. The leading NSAID hypersensitivity was to propionic acid derivatives (73%) followed by acetic acid derivatives (28.9%). Immediate reaction (≤1 h) was identified in 171 patients (57.8%), and angioedema was the most frequently reported symptom (179 patients, 59.5%), followed by urticaria and anaphylaxis in 85 (28.2%) and 62 (20.6%) patients, respectively. A drug provocation test was performed on 53 patients, and NSAID hypersensitivity was confirmed in 38 patients (71.6%). The independent factors identified, which could predict NSAID hypersensitivity, were personal history of allergic rhinitis/chronic rhinosinusitis (AR/CRS), onset of NSAID hypersensitivity over 15 years old, and immediate reaction. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Angioedema was the most typical symptom, and propionic acid derivatives were the most frequently reported culprit drugs. The significant risk factors predicting NSAID hypersensitivity were personal history of AR/CRS, onset of NSAID hypersensitivity reaction over 15 years old, and immediate reaction.