Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) is receiving global attention due to rare medicinal properties of significance to human health. Gene banks possess scanty germplasm and very little background information regarding its genetic variability that has hampered its improvement. We investigated the extent of variability among 17 Indian varieties of fenugreek using phenotypic and genetic markers. Multilocus genotyping by ten random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers detected an average of intraspecific variations amounting to 64.7% polymorphism in banding patterns. Analysis of molecular variance indicated that a greater proportion of total genetic variation exists within population (91%) rather than among populations. Higher values of Nei's gene diversity (h) and Shannon Information Index (i) and genetic distance analysis validate higher genetic diversity among Indian fenugreek varieties. SNPs at 14 sites of rDNA region revealed further lineages of distinct varieties with main RAPD clusters. The representative sequences of each subgroup and all distinct varieties have been submitted to NCBI database and assigned Gen Accession numbers HM 176640-176649. The measures of relative genetic distances among varieties of fenugreek did not completely correlate with the geographical distances of places of their development. The homogeneous phenotypic markers proved insufficient in exhibiting genetic divergence among fenugreek varieties studied. Eventually, the knowledge of their genetic relationships, DNA bar coding and phylogenies might contribute for the designing of intraspecific crosses between cultivars of this fenugreek collection with potential interest in seed spices breeding programme.
Mungbean germplasm characterization, evaluation and improvement are fundamentally based on morpho-agronomic traits. The lack of break-through in mungbean production has been due to non-availability of genetic variability for high yield potential. Forty-four genotypes of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.)Wilczek] were subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis to assess the genetic diversity and relationships among the genotypes. Multilocus genotyping by twelve RAPD primers generated 166 markers and detected an average of intraspecific variation amounting to 82% polymorphism in banding patterns. Dendrogram obtained from cluster analysis delineated all the 44 genotypes into six clusters. Higher values of Nei's gene diversity (h) and Shannon information index (i) and genetic distance analysis validate existence of wide genetic diversity among mungbean genotypes tested. Besides internal transcribed spacer (ITS) length variations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions/deletions (INDELS) were detected at number of sites in nuclear rDNA region and the sequences of representatives of each sub-cluster and all distinct genotypes have been submitted to NCBI database and assigned Gen accession numbers HQ 148136-148147. Multiple sequence alignment revealed further lineages of distinct genotypes with main RAPD clusters. The measures of relative genetic distances among the genotypes of mungbean did not completely correlate the geographical places of their development. The homogeneous phenotypic markers proved insufficient in exhibiting genetic divergence among mungbean genotypes studied. RMG-62, RMG-976, and NDM-56 have been identified as potential source of parents for crop improvement. RAPD primers, OPA-9 and OPA-2 as polymorphic genetic markers and number of pods/plant and number of seeds/plant as dependable phenotypic markers have been identified for improving yield potentials. This genetic diversity will be of significance in developing intraspecific crosses in mungbean crop improvement programme.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.