“…(Table 2) and is consistent with that reported by Mohammed et al (2010), which is due to the genetic differences between the genotypes studied, since each contributes with a different genetic identity as Andrade et al (2010) and this allows a better selection margin for the evaluated characters (Ali et al, 2016), especially for pod length and pods per peduncle for fresh consumption, pods per plant, peduncle length, 100 seed weight, which presented values of 82.23; 90.32, 95.48, 97.05 and 98.51%, respectively, and also the selection of plants with a shorter peduncle length, for the sake of assimilates, to revert to the seeds, since the yield is associated with the length of pods, number of pods by plant and weight of 100 seeds (Mohammed et al, 2010, Manggoel et al, 2012, Silva et al, 2014. The efficacy of selection depends on the existence and magnitude of genetic variability for yield and yield traits in the breeding material (Adewale et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2010;Raturi et al, 2015). Considering that the genetic control of quantitative traits as yield and its components is due to additive, dominant and epistatic genetic effects (Singh et al, 2016), heritability in conjunction with genetic advance alone is much better than the inheritance itself in the prediction of the best genotypes (Johnson et al, 1955, Ali et al, 2016.…”