IMPORTANCEIt remains unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 infection specifically increases the risk of serious obstetric morbidity.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with serious maternal morbidity or mortality from common obstetric complications.
In order to determine the effects of pravastatin (Pra) on angiogenic and placental hypoxic imbalance in a model of preeclampsia induced by overexpression of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), we randomly allocated pregnant CD1 mice to injection with adenovirus-carrying sFlt-1 or mFc (control). The sFlt-1 group received either Pra (sFlt-1 + Pra) or water (sFlt-1). Mice were sacrificed at day 18, and serum levels of sFlt-1 and soluble endoglin (sEng) were measured. Placental expression of placental (PLGF) and vascular endothelial (VEGF) growth factors and other markers of angiogenesis and hypoxia were assayed. We observed that Pra treatment in sFlt-1 mice reduced sFlt-1 and sEng concentrations at day 18 to levels similar to control group. Placental PLGF and VEGF expression were upregulated, and markers of hypoxia downregulated to levels similar to control group. Hence, Pra prevents the rise in circulating antiangiogenic factors in a mouse model of preeclampsia. Statins may represent a novel approach to prevention of preeclampsia.
The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that Dilapan-S is not inferior to the Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening at term. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnant women !37 weeks scheduled for induction with unfavorable cervix (3 cm dilated and 60% effaced) were randomly assigned to 12 hours of either Foley balloon inflated with 60 mL saline or Dilapan-S for cervical ripening. If the cervix remained unfavorable, then 1 more round of the assigned dilator was used. Management following ripening was left up to the clinical providers. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery. A satisfaction survey was also obtained after the preinduction period. Sample size was based on a noninferiority margin of 10%, 90% power, and an estimated frequency of vaginal delivery of 71% in Foley balloon and 76% in Dilapan-S. RESULTS: From November 2016 through February 2018, 419 women were randomized (209 to Foley balloon; 210 to Dilapan-S). In the intent-totreat analysis, vaginal delivery was more common in Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon (81.3% vs 76.1%), with an absolute difference with respect to the Foley balloon of 5.2% (95% confidence interval, e2.7% to 13.0%) indicating noninferiority for the prespecified margin. The difference was not large enough to show superiority. Noninferiority was confirmed in the per-protocol population (n ¼ 204 in the Foley balloon, n ¼ 188 in Dilapan-S), supporting the robustness of the results. Secondary outcomes were not different between groups, except for a longer time the device remained in place in Dilapan-S compared with the Foley balloon. Maternal and neonatal adverse events were not significantly different between groups. A priori interaction analyses showed no difference in the effect on vaginal delivery by cervical dilation at randomization, parity, or body mass index >30 kg/m 2. Patients with Dilapan-S were more satisfied than patients with the Foley balloon as far as sleep (P ¼ .01), relaxing time (P ¼ .001), and performance of desired daily activities (P ¼ .001). CONCLUSION: Dilapan-S is not inferior to the Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening at term. Advantages of Dilapan-S over Foley include Food and Drug Administration approval, safe profile, no protrusion from the introitus, no need to keep under tension, and better patient satisfaction.
Pregnant patients with the Delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are more symptomatic and were diagnosed earlier in pregnancy than patients diagnosed before the variant became prevalent.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.