Objective To evaluate clinical and laboratory effects of delaying ocrelizumab infusions during the COVID-19 pandemics in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Methods We have retrospectively searched our electronic database and identified 33 pwMS who had a delay in treatment due to COVID-19 pandemics. The following data were extracted: age, sex, multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotype: relapsing-remitting (RRMS) or primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), disease duration, Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS), previous disease modifying therapy (DMT), number of ocrelizumab cycles prior to the lockdown, dates of first ocrelizumab infusion, last ocrelizumab infusion prior to the lockdown and delayed ocrelizumab infusion after the lockdown. Flow cytometry results, relapses and EDSS progression prior to the delayed ocrelizumab infusion after the lockdown were extracted. Results The mean time between two ocrelizumab infusion during the lockdown was 7.72±0.64 (range 6.07 to 8.92) months. The mean time between last ocrelizumab infusion and the lymphocyte sampling prior to post COVID infusion was 6.59±0.95 (range 5.18 to 8.49) months. In this period, none of the studied patients had a relapse. In a multivariable linear regression analysis, time from last ocrelizumab infusion to lymphocyte sampling prior to the next infusion was the only significant predictor for CD19 + B cells count, when corrected for the number of previous ocrelizumab cycles and MS phenotype (RRMS or PPMS) (B=7.981, 95% C.I. 3.277-12.686, p=0.002). Conclusions We have not shown clinical consequences of delaying ocrelizumab due to COVID-19 pandemics. However, the delay in dosing of ocrelizumab was an independent predictor of repopulation of B cells.

Bendamustine is an alkylating agent classified into the group of nitrogen mustard analogues, synthesized almost sixty years ago. It was registered in former East Germany in 1971 and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Considering its beneficial properties in the therapy of relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies, synergistic effects with other antineoplastic agents and increasing recent reports on its immunomodulatory effects, bendamustine has once again gained its justified attention. The uniqueness of bendamustine-mediated effects should be observed keeping in mind its distinctive structure with structural similarities to both alkylating agents and purine analogs. In the present review, the current knowledge on the use of bendamustine in oncology, its pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action and toxicity was summarized. In addition, its immune-modulating effects that have not been fully elucidated so far are emphasized, hoping to encourage further investigations of this unique drug. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Bendamustine-mechanism of action, cell death, and cell cycle 3. Bendamustine-pharmacokinetics 4. Bendamustine in hematological and solid malignancies 5. Bendamustine-related side-effects in clinical trials 6. Immunological effects of bendamustine 7. Conclusion

No abstract

Babić et al: B regulatory cells and monocyte subpopulations in chronic graft-versus-host disease www.cmj.hrAim To assess the correlations of B regulatory cells (Bregs) and monocyte subsets in peripheral blood with the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-consensus-defined clinical manifestations of chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGvHD), in an attempt to establish their role as cellular biomarkers.Methods This multidisciplinary prospective study enrolled adult cGVHD patients treated in the

ObjectivesChronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is the most frequent cause of late non-relapse mortality after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT). Nevertheless, established biomarkers of cGvHD are still missing. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in cGvHD provided recommendations for biomarker research. We evaluated to which extent studies on cellular and soluble biomarkers in cGvHD published in the last 10 years complied with these recommendations. Also, we highlight the most promising biomarker candidates, verified in independent cohorts and/or repeatedly identified by separate studies.MethodsWe searched Medline and EMBASE for “cGvHD”, “biomarkers”, “soluble” and “cells” as MeSH terms or emtree subject headings, and their variations on July 28th, 2021, limited to human subjects, English language and last ten years. Reviews, case reports, conference abstracts and single nucleotide polymorphism studies were excluded. Criteria based on the set of recommendations from the NIH group for biomarker research in cGvHD were used for scoring and ranking the references.ResultsA total of 91 references encompassing 15,089 participants were included, 54 prospective, 17 retrospective, 18 cross-sectional, and 2 studies included both prospective and retrospective cohorts. Thirty-five papers included time-matched controls without cGvHD and 20 studies did not have any control subjects. Only 9 studies were randomized, and 8 were multicentric. Test and verification cohorts were included in 11 studies. Predominantly, diagnostic biomarkers were explored (n=54). Assigned scores ranged from 5-34. None of the studies fulfilled all 24 criteria (48 points). Nevertheless, the scores improved during the last years. Three cell subsets (CXCR3+CD56bright NK cells, CD19+CD21low and BAFF/CD19+ B cells) and several soluble factors (BAFF, IL-15, CD163, DKK3, CXCL10 and the panel of ST2, CXCL9, MMP3 and OPN) had the highest potential as diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers in cGvHD.ConclusionDespite several limitations of this review (limited applicability for paediatric population, definition of verification, missing data on comorbidities), we identified promising candidate biomarkers for further evaluation in multicentre collaborative studies. This review confirms the importance of the NIH consensus group criteria for improving the quality and reproducibility of cGvHD biomarker research.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignant disease of lymphoid precursors. According to immunophenotype, it is further subdivided into precursor B cell ALL and precursor T cell ALL, with precursor B cell ALL being much more common both in children and adults. Lineage switch from one lymphoid lineage to another during the course of the disease is extremely rarely reported. Here, we describe a case of a child who initially presented as a precursor BALL but 15 years later and after two successfully treated relapses of the original ALL presented with early T cell precursor leukemia. Although it was considered as a relapse, it could be interpreted as a case of secondary leukemia, which can be explained as a consequence of treatment as well as a constitutional feature of an individual. Also, it draws attention to the possibility that hematopoietic cells, and in that context also leukemic cells, are much more plastic and capable of reprogramming than previously thought.

No abstract

IgE is 268IU/ml. Specific IgE to Tomato-0.02, Strawberry-0.01, Kiwi fruit-0.03, . Thyroid function test, MRI brain were normal. Investigations performed for Wilson's disease, which were unremarkable. Coeliac screen was normal. Hereditary angioedema scree is normal There was no record of basal serum tryptase level. Treatment Initial diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis made. Later with new neurological and eye symptoms, diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome suspected, and he was started on trial of oral sodium cromoglycate capsules.In next clinic follow up, his symptoms were completely resolved and feedback from school was excellent in terms of concentration. Discussion Symptoms of allergic disorders are very wide. Mast cell activation syndrome especially with multisystem involvement should be a differential to Idiopathic Anaphylaxis.