The ID NOW COVID-19 assay is a promising tool for the rapid identification of COVID-19 patients. However, its performances were questioned. We evaluate the ID NOW COVID-19 in comparison to a reference RT-PCR using a collection of 48 fresh nasopharyngeal swabs sampled on universal transport media (UTM). Only 2 false negatives of the ID NOW COVID-19 were identified. They display PCR cycle threshold values of 37.5 and 39.2. The positive percent agreement and the negative percent agreement were 94.9% and 100%, respectively. The Kappa value was 0.88. The ID NOW COVID-19 combines high-speed and accurate processing. Using UTM, the ID NOW COVID-19 could be repeated in the case of invalid result. Further analyses, such as screening of genetic variants or genome sequencing, could also be performed with the same sample. As for all tests, the results should be interpreted according to clinical and epidemiological context.

Smallpox vaccine acceptability among French men having sex with men living with HIV in settings of monkeypox outbreak Monkeypox virus (MPX) is an orthopoxvirus discovered in Democratic Republic of Congo in 1970. Clinical presentation associates skin lesions in the anogenital and perioral regions, along with systemic symptoms such as fever, myalgia, or headache [1].

ABSTRACT:The mainstay treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome is an oral route dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12-receptor antagonist and Aspirin (ASA).To improve patient adherence to such treatments, combination therapies (polypill) are envisioned.

BackgroundGiven the importance of surgical debridement in healing of diabetic foot ulcers, effective local anaesthesia is required to manage the related extreme pain. The pharmaceutical proprietary products currently available have low concentrations and do not exceed 5% w/w local anaesthetic.ObjectiveFormulation design of a lidocaine cream of 25% and assessment of the intrinsic stability.MethodsA cream pharmaceutical form was chosen for its ability to cross the skin barrier and effectively anaesthetise the skin. The choice of cream formula is based on changes in the size of the emulsions and resistance to physical stress. Stability tests were assessed over a 6-month period in terms of physical (evaluation of oil droplets), microbiological (germ count and identification, and preservative antimicrobial efficacy) and chemical parameters (content and pH).ResultsUnder the study conditions, the drug product displayed good physicochemical and microbiological stability for 6 months at 20°C and 40°C, and no degradation product was detected. Due to the systemic adverse effects of lidocaine, the pH stability guarantee the drug product tolerance along with very weak systemic passage.ConclusionsGiven the good physicochemical and microbiological stability of the drug product over 6-month period, it has been made available to the clinical unit. An average of 250 patients per year benefit from the treatment with an excellent efficacy/tolerability ratio.

No abstract