Background: Although open reduction and internal fixation are recommended for displaced tibial tubercle avulsion fractures in young athletes, whether to use unicortical or bicortical fixation is debatable. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of unicortical versus bicortical fixation in a series of pediatric tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of patients with tibial tubercle fractures treated surgically at 2 level-1 pediatric tertiary care centers over a 12.5-year period. Patients aged below 18 years of age who received surgical treatment for displaced tibial tubercle fractures with postoperative follow-up were included. Fractures were classified using a modified Ogden classification system. The relative proportion of fracture types treated and incidence of complications were compared. Results: The cohort included 90 fractures in 86 patients. There were 82 male and 4 female individuals; average age was 14.7 years (range, 9.0 to 18 y). In total, 87 of 90 were treated with open reduction and internal screw fixation [51 unicortical (59%), 13 mixed (15%), 23 bicortical (26%)] and 3 with percutaneous pinning. All patients were followed-up until healing and postoperative follow-up average was 8 months (range, 3 to 34 mo). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to patient age (P=0.22), patient weight (P=0.22), and activity clearance times [unicortical: 19.9 wk (range, 10.4 to 42.3 wk); bicortical: 17.7 wk (range, 12.1 to 32 wk); P=0.19]. The mixed cortical group was cleared at an average of 19.9 weeks (range, 10.6 to 29.1 wk). The relative proportion of fracture patterns treated differed negligibly between the unicortical and bicortical groups. Complications were noted in 9 of 90 procedures (10% rate); all subjects showed evidence of full radiographic healing at last follow-up. Conclusions: There was no difference in outcome whether unicortical or bicortical fixation was used. All patients exhibited full healing and return to activities with very low-complication rates. The results of this study suggest the adequacy of unicortical fixation for treating tibial tubercle fractures in young athletes. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparative study.
Background: Available methods to quantify regional dynamic thoracic function in thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS) are limited. Purpose: To evaluate the use of quantitative dynamic MRI to depict changes in regional dynamic thoracic function before and after surgical correction of TIS. Materials and Methods: Images from free-breathing dynamic MRI in pediatric patients with TIS (July 2009-August 2015) were retrospectively evaluated before and after surgical correction by using vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR). Eleven volumetric parameters were derived from lung, chest wall, and diaphragm segmentations, and parameter changes before versus after operation were correlated with changes in clinical parameters. Paired analysis from Student t test on MRI parameters and clinical parameters was performed to detect if changes (from preoperative to postoperative condition) were statistically significant. Results: Left and right lung volumes at end inspiration and end expiration increased substantially after operation in pediatric patients with thoracic insufficiency syndrome, especially right lung volume with 22.9% and 26.3% volume increase at end expiration (P = .001) and end inspiration (P = .002), respectively. The average lung tidal volumes increased after operation for TIS; there was a 43.8% and 55.3% increase for left lung tidal volume and right lung tidal volume (P , .001 for both), respectively. However, clinical parameters did not show significant changes from pre-to posttreatment states. Thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle were poor predictors of MRI tidal volumes (chest wall, diaphragm, and left and right separately), but assisted ventilation rating and forced vital capacity showed moderate correlations with tidal volumes (chest wall, diaphragm, and left and right separately). Conclusion: Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib operation was associated with postoperative increases in all components of tidal volume (left and right chest wall and diaphragm, and left and right lung tidal volumes) measured at MRI. Clinical parameters did not demonstrate improvements in postoperative tidal volumes.
Background: Over the past 100 years, many procedures have been developed for correcting restrictive thoracic deformities which cause Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome (TIS). However, none of them have been assessed by a robust metric incorporating thoracic dynamics. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between radiographic spinal curve and lung volumes derived from thoracic dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). Our central hypothesis is that different anteroposterior (AP) major spinal curve types induce different restrictions on the left and right lungs and their dynamics.Methods: Retrospectively, we included 25 consecutive patients with TIS (14 neuromuscular, 7 congenital, 4 other) who underwent VEPTR surgery and received pre-implantation and postimplantation thoracic dMRI for clinical care. We measured thoracic and lumbar major curves by the Cobb measurement method from AP radiographs and classified the curves as per Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-defined curve types. From 4D dMRI images, we derived static volumes and tidal volumes of left and right lung, along with left and right chest wall and left and right diaphragm tidal volumes (excursions), and analyzed their association with curve type and major curve angles.Results: Thoracic and lumbar major curve angles ranged from 0 o -136 o and 0 o -116 o , respectively. A dramatic post-operative increase in chest wall and diaphragmatic excursion was seen qualitatively. All components of volume increased post-operatively by up to 533%, with a mean of 70%. As the major curve, main thoracic curve (MTC) was associated with higher tidal volumes (effect size range: 0.7-1.0) than thoracolumbar curve (TLC) in pre-and post-operative situation. Neither MTC nor TLC showed any meaningful correlation between volumes and major curve
Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT), or spinal growth tethering, is an emerging technology that recently received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval through a humanitarian device exemption designation to treat idiopathic scoliosis patients with remaining growth. This study compared patients who underwent AVBT with those treated with standard-of-care posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to determine inherent differences in patients and families who seek cutting-edge treatments. The authors reviewed 62 PSF patients from a multicenter registry and 20 AVBT patients from an FDA-approved investigational clinical trial. The authors examined demographics, preoperative clinical and radiographic variables, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). All included patients preoperatively were classified as Lenke type 1 or 2 with a thoracic curve of 35° to 60°, a lumbar curve less than 35°, and a skeletal maturity score of Risser sign 0 or Sanders bone age of 4 or less. Idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with surgical intervention were primarily White females who were 12 years old. No differences in demographics, clinical variables, and radiographic measures were detected between the PSF and AVBT cohorts. The AVBT group showed more thoracic flexibility on bending radiographs, correcting on average 59% compared with 43% for PSF patients ( P =.005). Patients had similar HRQOL total scores and scores across each of the 5 domains of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version 22. The percentage of patients scoring below 4.0 within each domain was comparable between cohorts. Scoliosis patients who underwent vertebral tethering at a level of deformity magnitude and maturity similar to those who underwent posterior fusion did not differ at baseline regarding demographics, clinical variables, and HRQOL. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(1):24–28.]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.