2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4661-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-planar spinal stereoradiography of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: considerations in 3D alignment and functional balance

Abstract: Diagnostic level II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3D spinal reconstruction using this system is already a validated process (12) and is currently used in clinical practice, while validated methods for rib cage 3D reconstructions are more recent and not fully established yet. Also, Pasha et al showed that the standing position with knuckles on clavicles position replicates the functional standing balance in AIS (13). Only one study by Ilharreborde et al (14) investigated the relationships between structural spinal and rib cage parameters in AIS and pulmonary function using 3D reconstructions from biplanar stereoradiography (three groups: Cobb angle 20 to 40 degrees, 40 to 65 degrees and over 65 degrees).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D spinal reconstruction using this system is already a validated process (12) and is currently used in clinical practice, while validated methods for rib cage 3D reconstructions are more recent and not fully established yet. Also, Pasha et al showed that the standing position with knuckles on clavicles position replicates the functional standing balance in AIS (13). Only one study by Ilharreborde et al (14) investigated the relationships between structural spinal and rib cage parameters in AIS and pulmonary function using 3D reconstructions from biplanar stereoradiography (three groups: Cobb angle 20 to 40 degrees, 40 to 65 degrees and over 65 degrees).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per hospital protocol, during the radiological acquisition, to not obstruct the image of the sagittal spine, patients were asked to put their hands on the wall, without standardizing their hand pressure. This could have affected the postural balance parameters of the patients [ 36 ], especially the CoP variables in the anteroposterior plane. Future studies should try to evaluate patients with an in-cabin posture that does not require the support of the hands [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could have affected the postural balance parameters of the patients [ 36 ], especially the CoP variables in the anteroposterior plane. Future studies should try to evaluate patients with an in-cabin posture that does not require the support of the hands [ 36 ]. Although the insoles used in this simultaneous evaluation have been showed to identify overall comparable balance data to a force plate in the article under review by Spine from St-Georges et al 2020, they do lack specificity in CoP displacement in static standing evaluation [ 37 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normal spine is facing the convex surface, and the spinous process faces the concave surface, forming a multidimensional rotating feature (Pasha et al, 2016). Such transformation of the spine leads to the problem of posture balance (Yamada et al, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%