Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: a population

Loco-regional recurrence from colon cancer is a significant clinical problem. A multidisciplinary treatment approach, including preoperative staging, a complete resection of the recurrence and more effective adjuvant treatments may improve the outcome.

These population-based data represent good-quality reference points.

Ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer are uncommon.

The advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for treating Stage III colon cancer patients is well established and widely accepted. However, many patients with Stage III colon cancer do not receive ACT. Moreover, there are controversies around the effectiveness of ACT for Stage II patients. We investigated the administration of ACT and its association with overall survival in resected Stage II (overall and stratified by low-/high-risk) and Stage III colon cancer patients in three European countries including The Netherlands (2009–2014), Belgium (2009–2013) and Sweden (2009–2014). Hazard ratios (HR) for death were obtained by Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 60244 resected colon cancer patients with pathological Stages II and III were analyzed. A small proportion (range 9–24%) of Stage II and over half (range 55–68%) of Stage III patients received ACT. Administration of ACT in Stages II and III tumors decreased with higher age of patients. Administration of ACT was significantly associated with higher overall survival in high-risk Stage II patients (in The Netherlands (HR; 95%CI = 0.82 (0.67–0.99), Belgium (0.73; 0.59–0.90) and Sweden (0.58; 0.44–0.75)), and in Stage III patients (in The Netherlands (0.47; 0.43–0.50), Belgium (0.46; 0.41–0.50) and Sweden (0.48; 0.43–0.54)). In Stage III, results were consistent across subgroups including elderly patients. Our results show an association of ACT with higher survival among Stage III and high-risk Stage II colon cancer patients. Further investigations are needed on the selection criteria of Stages II and III colon cancer patients for ACT.

No abstract

BackgroundTo demonstrate how assessment of life expectancy and loss in expectation of life can be used to address a wide range of research questions of public health interest pertaining to the prognosis of cancer patients.MethodsWe identified 135,092 cases of colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed during 1961–2011 from the population-based Swedish Cancer Register. Flexible parametric survival models for relative survival were used to estimate the life expectancy and the loss in expectation of life.ResultsThe loss in expectation of life for males aged 55 at diagnosis was 13.5 years (95 % CI 13.2–13.8) in 1965 and 12.8 (12.4–13.3) in 2005. For males aged 85 the corresponding figures were 3.21 (3.15–3.28) and 2.10 (2.04–2.17). The pattern was similar for females, but slightly greater loss in expectation of life. The loss in expectation of life is reduced given survival up to a certain time point post diagnosis. Among patients diagnosed in 2011, 945 life years could potentially be saved if the colon cancer survival among males could be brought to the same level as for females.ConclusionAssessment of loss in expectation of life facilitates the understanding of the impact of cancer, both on individual and population level. Clear improvements in survival among colon cancer patients have led to a gain in life expectancy, partly due to a general increase in survival from all causes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1427-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Key Points Question Did the treatment of colorectal cancer in Stockholm, Sweden, change during the COVID-19 pandemic? Findings In this cohort study of 1140 patients with colorectal cancer from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, the proportion of patients with colon cancer treated with ostomy almost doubled, from 17% in March to August 2019 to 30% in March to August 2020; short-term complications and time to surgery remained unchanged. Meaning These findings suggest that changes in surgical behavior occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, most likely aiming to reduce complications and intensive care unit care.