Objectives: To determine the association between frailty and short-term mortality in older adults hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 . Design: Retrospective single-center observational study. Setting and participants: Eighty-one patients with COVID-19 confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), at the Geriatrics department of a general hospital in Belgium. Measurements: Frailty was graded according to the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Demographic, biochemical, and radiologic variables, comorbidities, symptoms, and treatment were extracted from electronic medical records. Results: Participants (N ¼ 48 women, 59%) had a median age of 85 years (range 65-97 years) and a median CFS score of 7 (range 2-9); 42 (52%) were long-term care residents. Within 6 weeks, 19 patients died. Mortality was significantly but weakly associated with age (Spearman r ¼ 0.241, P ¼ .03) and CFS score (r ¼ 0.282, P ¼ .011), baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; r ¼ 0.301, P ¼ .009), lymphocyte count (r ¼ À0.262, P ¼ .02), and RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct, r ¼ À0.285, P ¼ .015). Mortality was not associated with long-term care residence, dementia, delirium, or polypharmacy. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, CFS, LDH, and RT-PCR Ct (but not age) remained independently associated with mortality. Both age and frailty had poor specificity to predict survival. A multivariable model combining age, CFS, LDH, and viral load significantly predicted survival. Conclusions and Implications: Although their prognosis is worse, even the oldest and most severely frail patients may benefit from hospitalization for COVID-19, if sufficient resources are available.

No abstract

HSV-1 occurred more in critically ill patients and high loads in BALF were associated with an increased mortality. The higher mortality observed in patients with HSV-1 load>10(5) ge/ml enforces its clinical relevance and necessitates to start randomized medical intervention studies.

Background and objectives: Faecal calprotectin is a valuable noninvasive marker for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of our study was to determine the correlation between six different calprotectin assays and compare their performance for diagnosis and follow up of IBD. Methods: Thirty-one patients with suspected IBD and 31 patients in follow up were included. We determined calprotectin by means of three rapid immmunochromatographic tests, two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and one automated fluoroimmunoassay. Results were correlated with endoscopic and histological findings. Results: Although all methods correlated significantly, slopes and intercepts differed extensively, with up to 5-fold quantitative differences between assays. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of IBD were 82-83 and 84-89%, respectively. For follow up, sensitivity in detecting mild ulcerative colitis was 71-100%. In moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, sensitivity was 100% for all assays. Specificity was 67-86% in both subgroups. In Crohn's disease, only moderate-to-severe disease could be differentiated from remission, with sensitivity 83-86% and specificity 75% for all tests. Conclusions: All calprotectin assays showed comparable clinical performance for diagnosis of IBD. For follow up, performance was acceptable, except for mild Crohn's disease. Because of the large quantitative differences, further efforts are needed to standardize calprotectin assays.

No abstract

Purpose Diagnostic value of point-of-care lung ultrasound (POCUS) in detection of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in an emergency setting is currently unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare diagnostic performance, in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, of POCUS lung, chest CT, and RT-PCR for clinically suspected COVID-19 infections in patients submitting to the emergency room (ER). Material and methods This retrospective study enrolled 93 patients with a suspected COVID-19 infection, admitted to the ER between March 28th and April 20th, 2020. Test subjects showed one or more symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, for which consequent COVID-19 testing was achieved using POCUS lung, chest CT, and RT-PCR. CT images were analyzed by 2 radiologists blinded to RT-PCR results. POCUS lung was performed by three emergency medical doctors, and reports were analyzed by the researcher, blinded to clinical information, US imaging, CT, and RT-PCR test results. Results Compared with RT-PCR, POCUS lung demonstrated outstanding sensitivity and NPV (93.3% and 94.1% respectively) while showing poor values for specificity, PPV, and accuracy (21.3%, 19.2%, and 33.3% respectively). In contrast, similar inquiries using chest CT as index test, excellent sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and accuracy (80.0%, 86.7%, 95.6%, and 85.6%, respectively) were reported, beside a moderate value for PPV (54.5%). Conclusion POCUS may provide early ER triage with a useful, rapid, low-threshold, and safe screening tool in evaluating possible COVID-19 infections. Due to limited specificity, suggestive POCUS lung findings should be confirmed with RT-PCR or chest CT.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Parvovirus B19 infections acquired during pregnancy may result in developmental disabilities of the foetus. This study evaluates the occupational risk of these infections in female day care personnel. IgG seroprevalence was determined in 310 Dutch day care workers and 158 nursing school students. CMV seroprevalence was age-related, starting at 21% in those <20 years and reaching 65% in those >35 years. Between the ages of 20 and 24 years the CMV prevalence was higher in day care personnel than in controls, 50% versus 31% (p=0.03). In the first 2 years of employment the risk of attracting CMV was significantly increased (OR adj =3.80; p<0.001) and the occupational risk was also increased (OR adj 2.19; p<0.001). Parvovirus seropositivity (71-77%) was not related to age or working at a day care centre. In conclusion, an occupational risk was observed for CMV, but not for Parvovirus infection in female day care personnel.

The performances of five commercially available enzyme immunoassays were compared for the detection of Borrelia burgdorferi IgM and IgG antibodies. Sensitivity was assessed with European serum samples collected from 45 patients with clinically defined Lyme disease in conjunction with a positive immunoblot (n = 44) or other serological test (n = 1). Sensitivities for the detection of IgM and IgG with each test were: Dako IgM 64%; Dako IgG 53%; Serion IgM 89%; and Serion IgG 88%. The Immunetics assay makes no distinction between IgM and IgG antibodies and had a sensitivity of 91%. Specificity was calculated by testing a control group comprising 40 patients with acute Epstein-Barr virus infection, cytomegalovirus infection, syphilis or rheumatoid factor positivity. The specificities achieved for each test were: Dako IgM 78%; Dako IgG 100%; Serion IgM 52%; Serion IgG 92%; and Immunetics 92%. The discriminatory power between control and patient samples appeared highest for the Immunetics assay. Between-run variation was comparable for the five tests and did not exceed 13%. When the Immunetics assay was used as an initial screening test, with low-titre positive results confirmed by an immunoblot, a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100% were achieved. To attain maximal sensitivity, the Serion IgM and IgG tests were also performed on samples with negative Immunetics results. All positive Serion IgM and IgG results were also confirmed by immunoblot. In conclusion, the Immunetics assay, based on a synthetic C6 peptide, can be used reliably as an initial screening test for the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease.