Measures of monaural temporal processing and binaural sensitivity were obtained from 12 young (mean age = 26.1 years) and 12 elderly (mean age = 70.9 years) adults with clinically normal hearing (pure-tone thresholds < or = 20 dB HL from 250 to 6000 Hz). Monaural temporal processing was measured by gap detection thresholds. Binaural sensitivity was measured by interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds. Gap and ITD thresholds were obtained at three sound levels (4, 8, or 16 dB above individual threshold). Subjects were also tested on two measures of speech perception, a masking level difference (MLD) task, and a syllable identification/discrimination task that included phonemes varying in voice onset time (VOT). Elderly listeners displayed poorer monaural temporal analysis (higher gap detection thresholds) and poorer binaural processing (higher ITD thresholds) at all sound levels. There were significant interactions between age and sound level, indicating that the age difference was larger at lower stimulus levels. Gap detection performance was found to correlate significantly with performance on the ITD task for young, but not elderly adult listeners. Elderly listeners also performed more poorly than younger listeners on both speech measures; however, there was no significant correlation between psychoacoustic and speech measures of temporal processing. Findings suggest that age-related factors other than peripheral hearing loss contribute to temporal processing deficits of elderly listeners.

Objective: This investigation was designed to determine whether people in the early to middle phases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) show impaired central auditory processing as compared with nondemented elderly.Design: A peripheral and central auditory test battery was administered to 10 subjects diagnosed with mild-to-moderate AD based on a neuropsychological test battery and radiographic techniques, and a control group of 10 subjects with no evidence of dementia, matched for age, gender, and average degree of hearing loss. Immittance audiometry, pure-tone and speech audiometry, and otoacoustic emissions were recorded in all subjects. Central auditory assessment included the synthetic sentence identification with ipsilateral competing message, dichotic digits, dichotic sentence identification, pitch patterns, and duration patterns.Results: Peripheral auditory status was statistically similar between subject groups. Neither average high frequency hearing sensitivity nor mean speech recognition ability was significantly different. However, a significant difference was noted between groups for average low frequency hearing sensitivity in the left ear @ < 0.06). Subjects with AD showed slightly poorer low frequency thresholds versus matched controls. Based on analysis of performance on each measure of the central auditory test battery, the AD group scored significantly lower than the matched control group on four of the five measures utilized. Differences for right versus left ear performance were found among AD subjects. Conclusions:Overall patterns in findings cannot be easily explained as artifacts of cognitive decline. Results support screening for central auditory dysfunction in the AD population, since impaired processing could influence psychiatric assessment of cognitive deficit as well as audiologic management of peripheral hearing loss in this population. (Ear & Hearing 1995;16;230-238) A significant amount of literature has attempted to reveal a relationship between hearing impairment and cognitive dysfunction (Gennis, Gamy,

No abstract