INTRODUCTIONThe timing of the transition from vegetative growth to flowering is of paramount importance in agriculture, horticulture, and plant breeding because flowering is the first step of sexual reproduction. Studies to understand how this transition is controlled have occupied countless physiologists during the past half century and have produced an almost unmanageably large amount of information (Bernier et al., 1981a; Halevy, 1985 Halevy, -1989Bernier, 1988;Kinet, 1993).A majority of plants use environmental cues to regulate the transition to flowering because all individuals of a species must flower synchronously for successful outcrossing and because all species must complete their sexual reproduction under favorable externa1 conditions. Any environmental variables exhibiting regular seasonal changes are potential factors that control the transition to flowering. The major factors are photoperiod, temperature, and water availability. Plants that do not require a particular photoperiod or temperature to flower, i.e., the so-called "autonomous-flowering" plants, are usually sensitive to irradiance. The environmental factors are perceived by different parts of the plant. Photoperiod and irradiance are perceived mainly by mature leaves in intact plants. Temperature is perceived by all plant parts, although low temperature (vernalization) is often perceived mainly by the shoot apex. Water availability is perceived by the root system.There are strong interactions between these different factors, so that each factor can change the threshold value for the effectiveness of the others. Plants, as opportunists, will thus make use of a different critical factor in different environments. Melilotus officinalis, for example, is a biennial with a vernalization requirement in temperate zones and an annual long-day (LD) plant with no cold requirement in arctic regions. In photoperiodic species, such as the short-day (SD) plant Pharbitis nil and the LD plant Silene armeria, flowering in unfavorable photoperiods can be caused by changing temperature, irradiance, or nutrition or by removing the roots. Similarly, in some late-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis, vernalization and an increase in the proportion of far-red light in the light source can substitute for one another in promoting the transition to flowering (Martínez-Zapater and Somerville, 1990; Bagnall, 1992). Clearly, there are alternate pathways to flowering in most, ifTo whom correspondence should be addressed. not all, plants. Because the different flowering-promoting factors are perceived by different parts of the plant, this implies that these parts interact and that the fate of the apical meristem-remaining vegetative or becoming reproductive-is controlled by an array of long-distance signals from the entire plant.The ability of subsets of plant parts to control flowering is also underscored by the fact that some plants may flower almost normally after complete defoliation (Hyoscyamus niger, red Perilla, Chenopodium amaranticolor) or derooting (Perilla, Loli...

The information storage and encoding ability of DNA arise from a remarkably simple 4--letter -A, T, G, C nucleobase code. Expanding this DNA 'alphabet' provides information about its function and evolution, and introduces new functionalities into nucleic acids and organisms. Previous efforts relied on the synthetically demanding incorporation of non--canonical bases into nucleosides. Here we report the discovery that a small molecule, cyanuric acid, with three thymine--like faces reprograms the assembly of unmodified poly(adenine) into stable, long and abundant fibers with a unique internal structure. Poly(A) DNA, RNA and PNA all form these assemblies. Our studies are consistent with the association of adenine and cyanuric acid units into a hexameric rosette, bringing together poly(A) triplexes with subsequent cooperative polymerization. Fundamentally, this study shows that small hydrogen--bonding molecules can be used to induce the assembly of nucleic acids in water, leading to new structures from inexpensive and readily available materials.

As examples of supramolecular devices performing chemical (ionic, molecular) control of binding events and models of related natural systems, two molecular conformational switches are described, which display cation-controlled nanomechanical motion coupled to substrate binding and release. The substrate binding relies on donor/acceptor interactions, provided by intercalation between planar sites located at the extremities of the switching units, whereas cation complexation is responsible for conformational regulation. The terpyridine py-py-py-based receptor is activated toward substrate binding upon complexation of a zinc(II) cation and operates in a two-state process. The replacement of the central pyridine by a 4,6-disubstituted pyridimine as in py-pym-py induces a state reversal and yields a new receptor which binds a substrate in the absence of cation, and releases it when copper(I) is introduced, following a three-step process. These systems represent effector-triggered supramolecular switching devices leading toward multistate nanomechanical chemical systems. These two systems illustrate the use of simple conformational switches in the binding site and allosteric regulation of substrate affinity.

No abstract