Purpose Traditional methods of composting are limited in timely production of good-quality compost due to recalcitrant nature of materials of plant origin. This study focused on evaluating the use chicken and donkey manure as starter cultures to biostimulate bioconversion of rice straw into bioorganic fertilizer. Use of starter cultures would enhance composting as a strategy for rice straw management to enhance soil fertilization and reduce environmental pollution. Methods In this study, chicken manure and donkey manure were used as starter cultures to enhance bioconversion of recalcitrant and abundant rice straw in Mwea, the main rice-producing area in Kenya. Treatments of the study included rice straw co-composted with chicken manure (T1), rice straw co-composted with donkey manure (T2) and a control (T0) consisting of untreated rice straw. Temperature, pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were monitored throughout the composting period. Resultant compost types were characterized in respect to their macro-nutrient concentrations, cation exchange capacity, pH and heavy metal content. Results Levels of temperature, pH and EC among the treatments of the study revealed significant differences at 5% level of confidence using Tukey's test. The three resultant compost types obtained were also physicochemically different as revealed by analysis of variance of cation exchange capacity, phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon content. Conclusion Results indicated that use of chicken and donkey manure significantly improved the composting process and the quality of resultant compost.
Aedes aegypti is the primary vector of several arboviruses, including dengue virus (DENV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV), yellow fever virus (YFV), and Zika virus (ZIKV). This vector is widespread globally in tropical and subtropical areas, but also found in temperate areas. Kenya experienced its first chikungunya outbreaks in Lamu County in 2004 and later in Mandera: 2016, and Mombasa: 2017. While there is yet to be a report of Zika outbreaks in Kenya, sero-surveillance studies indicate low-level transmission of this virus in coastal and northern parts of the country. Despite the presence of Ae. aegypti in Kisumu and Busia counties in sufficient densities, and free movement of people between the coast and the two western Kenya counties, no outbreaks of either disease have been reported in these regions. To investigate this phenomenon, we collected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes from county headquarter towns near railway stations connecting the coast and western Kenya and reared them under controlled laboratory conditions. The mosquitoes were then assessed for genetic variability using CO1 genes as well as their efficiency to transmit viruses using Laboratory colonies (F1) of the field mosquitoes challenged with an infectious blood meal containing CHIKV and ZIKV. Genetic analysis revealed the presence of both Ae. aegypti subspecies, (Ae. aegypti aegypti [Aaa] and Ae. aegyptiformosus [Aaf]) in the two western Kenya counties, with Aaf being dominant (19:8 for Kisumu samples and 25:6 for Busia samples). Additionally, pairwise comparison revealed minimal genetic differentiation (0.62%) between the study populations, with a high genetic variation (99.38%) observed within each population, indicating significant diversity within individual populations. Ae. aegypti populations from Kisumu and Busia counties exhibited competence for CHIKV, with infection, dissemination, and transmission rates of 55.2%, 85.5%, and 27.1% for Kisumu; and 57.8%, 71.8%, and 25% for Busia populations, respectively. There was no significant difference in vector competence between these two populations. Interestingly, neither population was competent for ZIKV. In conclusion, the data shows that the Ae. aegypti populations in the two cities were homogeneous. This could explain the observed similarity in vector competence for CHIKV and ZIKV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.