Exploring clients' priorities, the meanings they attributed to activities in daily life, and their underlying motives for goals should be part of therapeutic intervention. Children and their caregivers are valid and important sources for therapeutic goal setting. Basic human needs, e.g., for relatedness, competence (self-efficacy), autonomy, and meaningful personal orientation, should be considered when prioritizing goals for intervention. Implications for Rehabilitation Children are a valid and important source for therapeutic goal setting. Children's goals focused on activities and participation in all life areas, and half of the parents' goals on activities as relevant for productivity (followed by self-care and leisure), while teachers tended to prioritize goals at the body functions and structures level. The experience of their task performance affecting participation, and the basic needs for independence, relatedness (belonging to and being accepted by others), competence (self-efficacy), and joy through engagement in personally meaningful activities are main motives for children with developmental disabilities to choose their goals for intervention. A client-centred approach in working with children with developmental disabilities requires time and attention for exploring meaning-attributed activities for children and their proxies when collaboratively setting goals.

The DCDQ-G is a valid instrument for use with a clinic population in the 5.0 to 7.11 age group. Research into older age groups is ongoing.

BackgroundFunctional bladder and bowel problems are common in children and have a serious psychological as well as physical impact. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesise evidence on the impact of such conditions both on children's quality of life (QOL) and their parents.MethodsThe scoping review followed Arksey and O′Malley's framework. Relevant studies were identified by a comprehensive search of scientific databases. Inclusion criteria focused on children with bladder and bowel dysfunction, their QOL, and impact on parents. Studies were analysed for aims, study populations, measures, and results.ResultsA total of 783 records were retrieved with 30 meeting the criteria. Most studies found that QOL was reduced in children with nocturnal enuresis, day bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, and combined bladder and bowel dysfunction. Parents' QOL and social–emotional functioning were also negatively affected.ConclusionsFunctional bladder and bowel problems should be identified and treated as early as possible to minimise negative impacts on QOL of children and their carers. Future research should focus on how to best provide early and effective intervention in the most accessible manner.

No abstract

The health benefits and importance of family mealtimes have been extensively documented. Picky eating can impact this complex activity and has numerous extrinsic (or external) and intrinsic (or internal) features. Occupational therapists work with children and their families by looking at both intrinsic and extrinsic influences and are therefore well-placed to work within this context. This scoping review comprises a comprehensive search of key health industry databases using pre-determined search terms. A robust screening process took place using the authors pre-agreed inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 80 studies that met the inclusion criteria, which were then mapped using content analysis. The most common assessments used to identify picky eating relied on parental reports and recall. Often additional assessments were included in studies to identify both the intrinsic and extrinsic features and presentation. The most common reported intrinsic features of the child who is a picky eater included increased sensitivity particularly to taste and smell and the child’s personality. Extrinsic features which appear to increase the likelihood of picky eating are authoritarian parenting, rewards for eating, and pressuring the child to eat. Most commonly reported extrinsic features that decrease the likelihood of picky eating are family meals, responsive parents, and involving the child in the preparation of food. In conclusion, there is a lack of published papers addressing the role of occupational therapists in the assessment and identification of picky eating in children. There appears to be a complex interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic features which impact caregiver responses and therefore on the picky eater.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract