Crohn's disease symptomaƟc remission Fecal calprotecƟn response CRP response Week 6 Outcomes Specific Carbohydrate Diet Mediterranean Diet Participants achieving outcome (%) See Covering the Cover synopsis on page 739; See editorial on page 798. BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study compared the effectiveness of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) to the Mediterranean diet (MD) as treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) with mild to moderate symptoms. METHODS: Adult patients with CD and with mild-to-moderate symptoms were randomly assigned 1:1 to consume the MD or SCD for 12 weeks. For the first 6 weeks, participants received prepared meals and snacks according to their assigned diet. After 6 weeks, participants were instructed to follow the diet independently. The primary outcome was symptomatic remission at week 6. Key secondary outcomes at Gastroenterology 2021;161:837-852 CLINICAL ATweek 6 included fecal calprotectin (FC) response (FC <250 mg/g and reduction by >50% among those with baseline FC >250 mg/g) and C-reactive protein (CRP) response (highsensitivity CRP <5 mg/L and >50% reduction from baseline among those with high-sensitivity CRP >5 mg/L). RESULTS:The study randomized 194 patients, and 191 were included in the efficacy analyses. The percentage of participants who achieved symptomatic remission at week 6 was not superior with the SCD (SCD, 46.5%; MD, 43.5%; P ¼ .77). FC response was achieved in 8 of 23 participants (34.8%) with the SCD and in 4 of 13 participants (30.8%) with the MD (P ¼ .83). CRP response was achieved in 2 of 37 participants (5.4%) with the SCD and in 1 of 28 participants (3.6%) with the MD (P ¼ .68). CONCLUSIONS: The SCD was not superior to the MD to achieve symptomatic remission, FC response, and CRP response. CRP response was uncommon. Given these results, the greater ease of following the MD and other health benefits associated with the MD, the MD may be preferred to the SCD for most patients with CD with mild to moderate symptoms. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03058679

Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is recommended for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment; however, use in solid organ transplantation (SOT) patients has theoretical safety concerns. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated FMT safety, effectiveness, and risk factors for failure in SOT patients. Primary cure and overall cure were defined as resolution of diarrhea or negative C difficile stool test after a single FMT or after subsequent FMT(s) ± anti-CDI antibiotics, respectively. Ninety-four SOT patients underwent FMT, 78% for recurrent CDI and 22% for severe or fulminant CDI. FMT-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 22.3% of cases, mainly comprising self-limiting conditions including nausea, abdominal pain, and FMT-related diarrhea. Severe AEs occurred in 3.2% of cases, with no FMT-related bacteremia. After FMT, 25% of patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease had worsening disease activity, while 14% of cytomegalovirus-seropositive patients had reactivation. At 3 months, primary cure was 58.7%, while overall cure was 91.3%. Predictors of failing a single FMT included inpatient status, severe and fulminant CDI, presence of pseudomembranous colitis, and use of non-CDI antibiotics at the time of FMT. These data suggest FMT is safe in SOT patients. However, repeated FMT(s) or additional antibiotics may be needed to optimize rates of cure with FMT.

C urrently, 3 vaccines have been granted Emergency Use Authorization for coronavirus disease 2019 prevention in the United States. These include the messenger RNA (mRNA) platform vaccines (mRNA-1273; Moderna/National Institutes of Health) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and an adenovirus vector vaccine (Ad26.CoV2.S; Johnson & Johnson), which were 94%, 95%, and 67% effective against COVID-19 infection in their phase III registry trials against the endemic variants at the time, respectively. 1-3 All 3 vaccines target the viral spike (S) protein that facilitates severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) entry into host cells via its receptor binding domain, which interacts with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. 4 Although the mRNA platform vaccines are 2-dose vaccines administered 3-4 weeks apart, the Ad26.CoV2.S is administered as a single dose. Another adenovirus vector vaccine (ChAdOx1; Astrazeneca), not yet authorized in the United States, is intended as a 2-dose regimen with an interval of 8-12 weeks.Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and advanced therapies may have normal to slightly decreased humoral responses to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine platforms. 1 In addition, patients receiving infliximab and/or thiopurines have significantly lower rates of seroconversion than those on vedolizumab monotherapy after a single dose of either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. 2 A study of solid organ transplant recipients showed decreased humoral responses to Ad26.CoV2.S vaccine relative to both mRNA platform vaccines, although it is unknown whether these findings are generalizable to other immune compromised populations. 5 Q5 We aimed to assess for differences in serologic responses among patients with IBD who received Ad26.CoV2.S relative to those receiving mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2. Among 353 vaccine recipients with IBD participating in a prospective SARS-CoV-2 vaccine registry without prior COVID-19 infection and who had completed a full vaccine regimen, 148 (42%), 193 (55%), and 12 (3%) received mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.CoV2.S, respectively. Demographic and disease characteristics were similar across vaccine groups (mean age, 51 years, 62% were female) (Supplementary Table 1). Approximately 290 (83.1%) participants were on immune-modifying therapies (IMTs), as defined by receipt of advanced therapies (biologics or JAK inhibitors, 80.2%), immunomodulators (16.6%), and/or systemic corticosteroids (6.6%) at the time of initial vaccination. At least 2 weeks after completion of the vaccine regimen, positive antibody levels were detected in 121 (100%), 142 (99%), and 9 (90%) patients receiving mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.CoV2.S, respectively (Figure 1A). Quantitative log 10 (anti-Spike IgG

Article first published online 4 May 2015.

INTRODUCTION: Polyarteritis Nodosa (PAN) is a rare systemic necrotizing vasculitis that preferentially affects medium-sized arteries. Patients may present with systemic symptoms or with isolated organ involvement. PAN may involve the gastrointestinal (GI), renal, cardiac, musculoskeletal, skin and central nervous systems. When the GI tract is involved, abdominal pain is the most common presentation, thought secondary to transmural necrotizing inflammation of the mesenteric vessels leading to bowel ischemia. The small bowel is the most common site of involvement. Ischemic mucosal ulceration, bowel infarction and perforation can result. Case reports in the pediatric literature and a retrospective case series have described PAN causing severe GI strictures leading to intestinal obstruction. We report a rare case of PAN leading to a colonic obstruction. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A 36-year-old-male was admitted to the hospital with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and reduction in the passage of stool and gas for the previous 5 months. Computerized topography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated colonic dilatation and obstruction at the level of the sigmoid colon. A flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed and identified severe stenosis at the recto-sigmoid junction, 25 cm from the anal verge. This area could not be traversed with an upper endoscope or an ultrathin endoscope. Given the near complete obstruction of the sigmoid colon, exploratory laparotomy was performed, which revealed a sigmoid stricture with densely adherent loops of small bowel. Sigmoidectomy with en bloc small bowel resection was performed. Pathology demonstrated mucosal ulceration with transmural inflammation and injury of the medium-sized vessels. Some of the medium-sized vessels in the mesentery had evidence of acute injury, while others appeared to be in the healing state with obliteration and recanalization of the lumen. This admixture of early and late lesions was felt consistent with PAN. The patient was discharged with GI, surgery and rheumatology follow up. DISCUSSION: PAN is a rare systemic vasculitis that can present with a wide range of symptoms including abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, GI bleeding, diarrhea and weight loss. Intestinal stricture due to bowel ischemia can occur with resultant obstruction. The small intestine is the most common site of ischemia in the GI tract. As such the differential diagnosis of intestinal strictures should include chronic ischemia from systemic vasculitis.

No abstract

No abstract