The tumor suppressor p53 is transcription factor composed of four identical subunits. The majority of the mutations in p53 are missense mutations that impair DNA binding. On the other hand, the p53-related p63 and p73 genes are rarely mutated, but many cell types express natural variants lacking the N-terminal transactivation domain (N⌬). Compelling evidence indicates that both the DNA binding-defective and N⌬ mutants can impair the function of wild-type p53 in a dominant-negative manner. Interestingly, it is uncertain how many mutant subunit(s) a p53 tetramer can tolerate. In this study, we first made theoretical predictions based on the number of mutant p53 monomers needed to inactivate a tetramer and then tested how well the experimental data fit the predicted values. Surprisingly, these experiments reveal that DNA binding-defective p53 mutants (R249S and R273H) are very ineffective in impairing the transcriptional activity of p53: at least three mutants are required to inactivate a tetramer. In marked contrast, p53N⌬ is a very potent inhibitor of p53: one N⌬ subunit per tetramer is sufficient to abolish the transcriptional activity. DNA binding is not necessary for the N⌬ proteins to inactivate p53. Similarly, N⌬ variants of p63 and p73 are also powerful inhibitors of members of the p53 family. These results have important implications for our thinking about the mechanism of tumorigenesis involving missense p53 mutants or the N-terminally truncated isoforms.

Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are key regulators of the human cell cycle. Here we have directly measured the concentrations of the G(1) and G(2) cyclins and their CDK partners in highly synchronized human cervical carcinoma cells (HeLa). To determine the exact concentrations of cyclins and CDKs in the cell extracts, we developed a relatively simple method that combined the use of (35)S-labeled standards produced in rabbit reticulocyte lysates and immunoblotting with specific antibodies. Using this approach, we formally demonstrated that CDC2 and CDK2 are in excess of their cyclin partners. We found that the concentrations of cyclin A2 and cyclin B1 (at their peak levels in the G(2) phase) were about 30-fold less than that of their partner CDC2. The peak levels of cyclin A2 and cyclin E1, at the G(2) phase and G(1) phase, respectively, were only about 8-fold less than that of their partner CDK2. These ratios are in good agreement with size fractionation analysis of the relative amount of monomeric and complexed forms of CDC2 and CDK2 in the cell. All the cyclin A2 and cyclin E1 are in complexes with CDC2 and CDK2, but there are some indications that a significant portion of cyclin B1 may not be in complex with CDC2. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that the concentration of the CDK inhibitor p21(CIP1/WAF1) induced after DNA damage is sufficient to overcome the cyclin-CDK2 complexes in MCF-7 cells. These direct quantitations formally confirmed the long-held presumption that CDKs are in excess of the cyclins in the cell. Moreover, similar approaches can be used to measure the concentration of any protein in cell-free extracts.

The p53 gene encodes one of the most important tumor suppressors in human cells and undergoes frequent mutational inactivation in cancers. MDM2, a transcriptional target of p53, binds p53 and can both inhibit p53-mediated transcription [1] [2] and target p53 for proteasome-mediated proteolysis [3] [4]. A close relative of p53, p73, has recently been identified [5] [6]. Here, we report that, like p53, p73alpha and the alternative transcription product p73beta also bind MDM2. Interaction between MDM2 and p53 represents a key step in the regulation of p53, as MDM2 promotes the degradation of p53. In striking contrast to p53, the half-life of p73 was found to be increased by binding to MDM2. Like MDM2, the MDM2-related protein MDMX also bound p73 and stabilized the level of p73. Moreover, the growth suppression functions of p73 and the induction of endogenous p21, a major mediator of the p53-dependent growth arrest pathway, were enhanced in the presence of MDM2. These differences between the regulation of p53 and p73 by MDM2/MDMX may highlight a physiological difference in their action.

Many cyclins are degraded by the ubiquitination/proteasome pathways involving the anaphase-promoting complex and SCF complexes. These degradations are frequently dependent on phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), providing a self-limiting mechanism for CDK activity. Here we present evidence from in vitro and in vivo assay systems that the degradation of human cyclin A can be inhibited by kinase-inactive mutants of CDK2 and CDC2. One obvious interpretation of these results is that like other cyclins, CDK-dependent phosphorylation of the cyclin A may be involved in cyclin A degradation. Our data indicated that CDK2 can phosphorylate cyclin A on Ser-154. Site-directed mutagenesis of Ser-154 abolished the phosphorylation by recombinant CDK2 in vitro and the majority of cyclin A phosphorylation in the cell. Activation of CDK2 and binding to SKP2 or p27 KIP1 were not affected by the phosphorylation of Ser-154. Surprising, in marked contrast to cyclin E, where phosphorylation of Thr-380 by CDK2 is required for proteolysis, degradation of cyclin A was not affected by Ser-154 phosphorylation. It is likely that the stabilization of cyclin A by the kinaseinactive CDKs was mainly due to a cell cycle effect. These data suggest an important difference between the regulation of cyclin A and cyclin E. Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs)1 are key regulators of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Cyclin B is associated with CDC2 and the cyclin B-CDC2 complexes regulate entry into M phase (1). Cyclin A-CDK2 and cyclin E-CDK2 complexes are important for progression through S phase and the G 1 /S transition, respectively (2, 3). D-type cyclins are associated with CDK4 and CDK6, and the complexes are required for G 1 progression (2).The kinase activity of CDK is tightly regulated by an intricate system of phosphorylation and protein-protein interactions (4, 5). By definition, the activation of CDKs is dependent on the association with a cyclin subunit. The post-translational regulation of cyclins occurs mainly through degradation (6). The mitotic cyclins are degraded near the end of anaphase by the ubiquitin-proteasome system, consisting of a nonspecific ubiquitin-activating enzyme, a ubiquitin-carrier protein, a cyclin-specific ubiquitin ligase known as the cyclosome or anaphase-promoting complex (APC), and a constitutively active proteasome complex. The N-terminal destruction box sequences of the mitotic cyclins are required for their degradation (7), possibly because they are recognized by the cyclin-specific ubiquitin ligase enzyme. Recent biochemical and genetic studies have demonstrated that vertebrate APC contains at least eight subunits (APC1-APC8) (8).The activity of APC is highly regulated, turning on in anaphase and persist until late G 1 (9, 10). Association between APC and the WD40 repeat-containing protein Hct1p (also known as Cdh1p) is required for the degradation of mitotic cyclins in yeast (11). From S phase onward, phosphorylation of Hct1p by CDKs blocked the Hct1p-APC interaction (12), allowing the mi...

Members of the p53 family of transcription factors have essential roles in tumor suppression and in development. MDM2 is an essential regulator of p53 that can inhibit the transcriptional activity of p53, shuttle p53 out of the nucleus, and target p53 for ubiquitination-mediated degradation. Little is known about the interaction and selectivity of different members of the p53 family (p53, p63, and p73) and the MDM2 family (MDM2 and MDMX). Here we show that the transcriptional activities of p53 and p73, but not that of p63, were inhibited by both MDM2 and MDMX. Consistent with these, we found that MDMX can physically interact with p53 and p73, but not with p63. Moreover, ectopically expressed MDM2 and MDMX could induce alterations in the subcellular localization of p73, but did not affect the subcellular localization of p53 and p63. Finally, we demonstrate that while ARF can interact with MDM2 and inhibit the regulation of p53 by MDM2, no interaction was found between ARF and MDMX. These data reveal that significant differences and selectivity exist between the regulation of different members of the p53 family by MDM2 and MDMX. ß

Cyclin F, a cyclin that can form SCF complexes and bind to cyclin B, oscillates in the cell cycle with a pattern similar to cyclin A and cyclin B. Ectopic expression of cyclin F arrests the cell cycle in G 2 /M. How the level of cyclin F is regulated during the cell cycle is completely obscure. Here we show that, similar to cyclin A, cyclin F is degraded when the spindle assembly checkpoint is activated and accumulates when the DNA damage checkpoint is activated. Cyclin F is a very unstable protein throughout much of the cell cycle. Unlike other cyclins, degradation of cyclin F is independent of ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated pathways. Interestingly, proteolysis of cyclin F is likely to involve metalloproteases. Rapid destruction of cyclin F does not require the N-terminal F-box motif but requires the COOH-terminal PEST sequences. The PEST region alone is sufficient to interfere with the degradation of cyclin F and confer instability when fused to cyclin A. These data show that although cyclin F is degraded at similar time as the mitotic cyclins, the underlying mechanisms are entirely distinct.Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 1 are key regulators of the eukaryotic cell cycle. In mammalian cells, different cyclin-CDK complexes are involved in regulating different cell cycle transitions: cyclin D-CDK4/6 for G 1 progression, cyclin E-CDK2 for the G 1 -S transition, cyclin A-CDK2 for S phase progression, and cyclin A/B-CDC2 for entry into M phase (1). Apart from these well known roles in the cell cycle, several cyclins and CDKs are involved in processes not directly related to the cell cycle. Cyclin D can bind and activate the estrogen receptor, and CDK5 is activated in postmitotic neurons by p35. The cyclin H-CDK7 complex is a component of both the CDKactivating kinase and the basal transcription factor TFIIH and can phosphorylate CDKs and the carboxyl-terminal repeat domain of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II, respectively.

No abstract

CHK1 and CHK2 are key mediators that link the machineries that monitor DNA integrity to components of the cell cycle engine. Despite the similarity and potential redundancy in their functions, CHK1 and CHK2 are unrelated protein kinases, each having a distinctive regulatory domain. Here we compare how the regulatory domains of human CHK1 and CHK2 modulate the respective kinase activities. Recombinant CHK1 has only low basal activity when expressed in cultured cells. Surprisingly, disruption of the C-terminal regulatory domain activates CHK1 even in the absence of stress. Unlike the full-length protein, C-terminally truncated CHK1 displays autophosphorylation, phosphorylates CDC25C on Ser 216 , and delays cell cycle progression. Intriguingly, enzymatic activity decreases when the entire regulatory domain is removed, suggesting that the regulatory domain contains both inhibitory and stimulatory elements. Conversely, the kinase domain suppresses Ser 345 phosphorylation, a major ATM/ATR phosphorylation site in the regulatory domain. In marked contrast, CHK2 expressed in either mammalian cells or in bacteria is already active as a kinase against itself and CDC25C and can delay cell cycle progression. Unlike CHK1, disruption of the regulatory domain of CHK2 abolishes its kinase activity. Moreover, the regulatory domain of CHK2, but not that of CHK1, can oligomerize. Finally, CHK1 but not CHK2 is phosphorylated during the spindle assembly checkpoint, which correlates with the inhibition of the kinase. The mitotic phosphorylation of CHK1 requires the regulatory domain, does not involve Ser 345 , and is independent on ATM. Collectively, these data reveal the very different mode of regulation between CHK1 and CHK2.