Background: Studies on several preclinical models of type 2 diabetes mellitus have been conducted to establish the hypoglycemic activity of Momordica charantia L. Concerned with appropriateness of these models, we designed a systematic review to establish the efficacy and safety of M. charantia L. in preclinical models of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Review authors will search without language restriction in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases through April 2019. Search filters will be applied to enhance search efficiency. The authors will search for gray literature in Google and Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Two authors will evaluate full texts, extract data, and asses risk of bias independently. The review will include randomized or non-randomized studies that assessed the efficacy or safety of M. charantia L. with vehicle control group. The primary endpoint will be fasting blood glucose level. We will use Egger's test to assess publication biases. Chi-square test and I 2 will be used to assess heterogeneity in effect size of the primary outcome. Using RevMan software version 5.3, the authors will perform a meta-analysis of quantitative data. Discussion: The strength of evidence will be rated as high, moderate, low, or very low using GRADE framework for animal studies. This systematic review will potentially improve research practice by identifying risks of bias and design features that compromise translatability and contribute to evidence-based clinical trial design.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic hyperglycemic condition due to progressively impaired glucose regulation. Momordica charantia L. could potentially improve hyperglycemia because its fruit extracts can alleviate insulin resistance, beta‐cell dysfunction, and increase serum insulin level. We evaluated the effect of M. charantia L. in comparison with a vehicle on glycemic control in animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus. MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched without language restriction through April 2019. About 66 studies involving 1861 animals that examined the effect of M. charantia L. on type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. Fruits and seed extracts reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c in comparison to vehicle control: (42 studies, 815 animals; SMD, −6.86 [95% CI; −7.95, −5.77], 3 studies, 59 animals; SMD; −7.76 [95% CI; −12.50, −3.01]) respectively. Also, the extracts have hepato‐renal protective effects at varying doses and duration of administration. Despite the observed significant glycemic control effect, poor methodological quality calls for future researches to focus on standardizing extract based on chemical markers and adopt measures to improve the quality of preclinical studies such as sample size calculation, randomization, and blinding.
49Background 50 Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae) has been used to control hyperglycemia in people with 51 type 2 diabetes mellitus in Asia, South America, and Africa for decades. However, a meta-analysis 52 of clinical trials confirmed very low-quality evidence of its efficacy. To potentially increase the 53 certainty of evidence, we evaluated the effect of M. charantia L. in comparison with vehicle on 54 glycemic control in animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 55 Methods 56Review authors searched in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases without 57 language restriction through April 2019. Two authors independently evaluated full texts, assessed 58 the risk of bias, and extracted data. We analyzed the influence of study design and evidence of 59 publication bias. 60 Results 61The review included 66 studies involving 1861 animals. They had a follow up between 7 and 90 62 days. Majority 29 (43.9%) used Wistar albino rats, and 37 (56.1%) used male animals. Thirty-two 63 (48%) used an aqueous extract of fresh fruits. M. charantia L. reduced fasting plasma glucose 64 (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c in comparison to vehicle control (42 studies, 815 65 animals; SMD, -6.86 [95% CI; -7.95, -5.77], 3 studies, 59 animals; SMD; -7.76 [95%CI; -12.50, -66 3.01]) respectively. Magnitude of FPG was large in Wistar albino rat subgroup; SMD; -10.29, 67 [95%CI; -12.55, -8.03]. Publication bias changed FPG to non-significant -2.46 SMD, [95%CI; -68 5.10, 0.17]. We downgraded the evidence to moderate quality due to poor methodological quality, 69 high risk of bias, unexplained heterogeneity, suspected publication bias, and lack of standardized 70 dose. 4 71 Conclusion 72 M. charantia L. lowers elevated plasma glucose level in type 2 diabetes mellitus animal models. 73 Publication bias and poor methodological quality call for future researches to focus on 74 standardizing dose with chemical markers and provide measures to improve preclinical type 2 75 diabetes mellitus studies. 76 Systematic review registration CRD42019119181 77 Keywords 78 Bitter gourd; type 2 diabetes mellitus; efficacy; safety; meta-analysis; preclinical. 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 5 93 94 Introduction 95 Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic hyperglycemic condition in response to 96 progressively impaired glucose regulation due to insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction [1,2]. 97 The chronicity of hyperglycemia causes microvascular complications in the retina, renal 98 glomerulus and peripheral nerves [3]; and increases the risk of accelerated atherosclerosis and 99 premature death [4]. Other complications include dementia, sexual dysfunction, depression and 100 lower-limb amputations [5-7]. 101 People with T2DM use oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) for glycemic control and ameliorating 102 diabetes complications, but the OHAs have in recent years been linked to intolerable side effects 103 and increasing failure rate [8], leaving the majority of people with T2DM using medicinal plants 104 as alternative the...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.