Purpose: The UK Glaucoma Treatment Study (UKGTS) demonstrated the effectiveness of an intraocular pressurelowering drug in patients with glaucoma using visual field progression as a primary outcome. We now test the hypothesis that responses on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs-secondary outcome measure) differ between patients receiving a topical prostaglandin analogue (Latanoprost) or placebo eye drops in UKGTS. Design: Multi-centre, randomised, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Participants: Newly diagnosed glaucoma patients recruited into the UKGTS with baseline and exit PROM data (n= 182 and n=168 patients from the treatment and placebo group, respectively). Methods: The UKGTS was a multi-centre, randomised, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial, where patients with newly diagnosed open angle glaucoma were allocated to receive Latanoprost (treatment) or placebo (trial registration number: ISRCTN96423140); the observation period was 24 months. Patients completed general health PROMs (EQ-5D and SF-36) and PROMs specific to glaucoma (GQL-15 and GAL-9) at baseline and at exit from the trial. Percentage change between baseline and exit measurement on PROMs were calculated for each patient and compared between treatment arms. In addition, differences between stable patients (n=272) and those with glaucomatous progression (n=78), as determined by visual field change (primary outcome), were assessed. Main Outcome Measure: PROMs on health-related and vision-related quality of life. Results: Average percentage change on PROMs was similar for patients in both arms of the trial with no statistically significant differences between treatment and placebo groups (EQ-5D, p = 0.98; EQ-5D VAS, p = 0.88; SF-36, p = 0.94, GQL-15, p = 0.66; GAL-9, p = 0.87). There were statistically significant differences between stable and progressing patients, as determined by visual fields, on glaucoma-specific PROMs (GQL-15, p = 0.02; GAL-9, p = 0.02) but not on general health PROMs (EQ-5D, p = 0.62; EQ-5D VAS, p = 0.23; SF-36, p = 0.65) Conclusions: Average change in PROMs on health-related and visionrelated quality of life was similar for the treatment and placebo group in the UKGTS. PROMs, specifically those used in the UKGTS, may not be sensitive enough to be used as a primary endpoint in clinical trials when participants have newly diagnosed early stage glaucoma. Taxonomy Patient-Reported Outcome, Glaucoma