8Neuropsychological deficits, such as poor episodic memory, are consistent features of mild cognitive impairment and also that of early stage of 9 dementia. The aim of the present study was to detect cognitive dysfunction among patients with Alzheimer's disease or with mild cognitive 10 impairment (MCI), which refers to a transitional state between the cognition of normal aeging and mild dementia regarded as a high-risk condition 11 for the development of clinically probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). Computerized tests of memory, attention and executive functions were 12 studied in groups of AD subjects (n = 15) and MCI subjects (n = 25). On all measures, the performance of the AD group was significantly weaker 13 compared to healthy individuals or to the MCI group. The performance of both the AD and MCI patients in the Paired Associate Learning test was 14 significantly impaired, which may suggest that MCI patients are already in the early stages of the disease. 15
The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VAD) increases with aging of the population. The role of lipoproteins in the pathogenesis of AD is unclear: apoE(2) offers protection and apoE(3) is neutral, while apoE(4) promotes the development of the disease. Recently, several studies have confirmed the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of AD and VAD. HDL-associated paraoxonase is one of the antioxidative enzymes that may reduce LDL oxidation. In our study, we investigated the lipid parameters of the sera and the serum paraoxonase activity in patients with AD and VAD. Lipid parameters were determined by an autoanalyzer in 30 AD patients, 40 VAD patients and 40 healthy, age-matched control (C) subjects. Paraoxonase activity was measured spectrophotometrically using paraoxon as the substrate. The phenotypic distribution of paraoxonase was determined by the dual substrate method, using paraoxon and phenylacetate as substrates. In our results, we found that most of the patients with AD had the apoE(4) isoform, consistent with other studies. In the VAD and AD patients we found significantly higher total-cholesterol compared to the control group (C: 4.71 +/- 0.89, VAD: 6.3 +/- 0.8, AD: 6.52 +/- 0.7 mmol/l; p < 0.01) and LDL-cholesterol levels (C: 2.6 +/- 0.6, VAD: 3.96 +/- 0.8, AD: 3.84 +/- 0.6 mmol/l; p < 0.001). The HDL-associated antioxidant, paraoxonase activity did not differ significantly in the patient groups, but compared to the healthy control subjects, paraoxonase activity was significantly lower in both of the patient groups (C: 188 +/- 55 U/l; AD: 131 +/- 37, VAD: 151 +/- 50 l; p < 0.05). Our results suggest that the defect in HDL-associated antioxidant capacity plays a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia.
Aims.Shared decision making has been advocated as a means to improve patient-orientation and quality of health care. There is a lack of knowledge on clinical decision making and its relation to outcome in the routine treatment of people with severe mental illness. This study examined preferred and experienced clinical decision making from the perspectives of patients and staff, and how these affect treatment outcome.Methods.“Clinical Decision Making and Outcome in Routine Care for People with Severe Mental Illness” (CEDAR; ISRCTN75841675) is a naturalistic prospective observational study with bimonthly assessments during a 12-month observation period. Between November 2009 and December 2010, adults with severe mental illness were consecutively recruited from caseloads of community mental health services at the six study sites (Ulm, Germany; London, UK; Naples, Italy; Debrecen, Hungary; Aalborg, Denmark; and Zurich, Switzerland). Clinical decision making was assessed using two instruments which both have parallel patient and staff versions: (a) The Clinical Decision Making Style Scale (CDMS) measured preferences for decision making at baseline; and (b) the Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction Scale (CDIS) measured involvement and satisfaction with a specific decision at all time points. Primary outcome was patient-rated unmet needs measured with the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS). Mixed-effects multinomial regression was used to examine differences and course over time in involvement in and satisfaction with actual decision making. The effect of clinical decision making on the primary outcome was examined using hierarchical linear modelling controlling for covariates (study centre, patient age, duration of illness, and diagnosis). Analysis were also controlled for nesting of patients within staff.Results.Of 708 individuals approached, 588 adults with severe mental illness (52% female, mean age = 41.7) gave informed consent. Paired staff participants (N = 213) were 61.8% female and 46.0 years old on average. Shared decision making was preferred by patients (χ2 = 135.08; p < 0.001) and staff (χ2 = 368.17; p < 0.001). Decision making style of staff significantly affected unmet needs over time, with unmet needs decreasing more in patients whose clinicians preferred active to passive (−0.406 unmet needs per two months, p = 0.007) or shared (−0.303 unmet needs per two months, p = 0.015) decision making.Conclusions.Decision making style of staff is a prime candidate for the development of targeted intervention. If proven effective in future trials, this would pave the ground for a shift from shared to active involvement of patients including changes to professional socialization through training in principles of active decision making.
BackgroundA considerable amount of research has been conducted on clinical decision making (CDM) in short-term physical conditions. However, there is a lack of knowledge on CDM and its outcome in long-term illnesses, especially in care for people with severe mental illness.Methods/DesignThe study entitled "Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness" (CEDAR) is carried out in six European countries (Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Switzerland and UK). First, CEDAR establishes a methodology to assess CDM in people with severe mental illness. Specific instruments are developed (and psychometric properties established) to measure CDM style, key elements of CDM in routine care, as well as CDM involvement and satisfaction from patient and therapist perspectives. Second, these instruments are being put to use in a multi-national prospective observational study (bimonthly assessments during a one-year observation period; N = 560). This study investigates the immediate, short- and long-term effect of CDM on crucial dimensions of clinical outcome (symptom level, quality of life, needs) by taking into account significant variables moderating the relationship between CDM and outcome.DiscussionThe results of this study will make possible to delineate quality indicators of CDM, as well as to specify prime areas for further improvement. Ingredients of best practice in CDM in the routine care for people with severe mental illness will be extracted and recommendations formulated. With its explicit focus on the patient role in CDM, CEDAR will also contribute to strengthening the service user perspective. This project will substantially add to improving the practice of CDM in mental health care across Europe.Trial registerISRCTN75841675.
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to develop and evaluate psychometric properties of the Clinical Decision Making Style (CDMS) scale which measures general preferences for decision making as well as preferences regarding the provision of information to the patient from the perspectives of people with severe mental illness and staff.MethodsA participatory approach was chosen for instrument development which followed 10 sequential steps proposed in a current guideline of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation of measures. Following item analysis, reliability, validity, and long-term stability of the CDMS were examined using Spearman correlations in a sample of 588 people with severe mental illness and 213 mental health professionals in 6 European countries (Germany, UK, Italy, Denmark, Hungary, and Switzerland).ResultsIn both patient and staff versions, the two CDMS subscales “Participation in Decision Making” and “Information” reliably measure distinct characteristics of decision making. Validity could be demonstrated to some extent, but needs further investigation.ConclusionsTogether with two other five-language patient- and staff-rated measures developed in the CEDAR study (ISRCTN75841675) – “Clinical Decision Making in Routine Care” and “Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction” – the CDMS allows empirical investigation of the complex relation between clinical decision making and outcome in the treatment of people with severe mental illness across Europe.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.