Penelilian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang (statute approach) dan menerapkan metode analisis deskriptif yang dilakukan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara Agama dengan Pancasila dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, yang meliputi korelasi antara prinsip Agama dengan rumusan nilai-nilai dalam Pancasila, dan kedudukan keduanya dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Agama menjadi objek kajian yang begitu kompleks dalam kaitannya dengan kehidupan bernegara. Terakhir kali tampak pada pernyataan Yudian Wahyudi (Ketua BPIP) tentang agama sebagai musuh Pancasila. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 yang diposisikan tertinggi dalam hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan merupakan indikator yang tepat dalam mengkaji hubungan antara Agama dengan Pancasila, khususnya dalam kerangka paradigma hukum normatif di Indonesia. Pada pokok analisis hasildan pembahasan, disimpulkanbahwa yaitu Agama merupakan pendukung eksistensi Pancasila, dan Agama tidak dapat dipertentangkan atau dibandingkan dengan Pancasila pada konteks kedudukan dan posisinya dalam kehidupan bernegara dan dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Hasil tersebut begitu penting bagi upaya perwujudan tujuan negara, guna melandasi penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dalam bernegara yang efektif dan efisien, tanpa mengungkit kembali permasalahan dan perdebatan yang sejatinya telah terselesaikan.
The Indonesian Constitutional Court through Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, in the consideration section, shows how public participation in the formation of laws should be implemented, that is based on formal legal regulations and carried out in a “meaningful participation”. Participation is said to be meaningful if the right to be heard, the right to be considered, and the right to be explained or answered to the opinions and inputs given are fulfilled by the legislators. Who the subjects of meaningful participation are, what the limitations of the material or substance of meaningful participation are, where the appropriate space or media for meaningful participation is, and how to consider and answer to meaningful participation is given, will be the problems discussed in this conceptual study. This study needs to be carried out to clarify the limits of meaningful participation so that the concept or theory as the basis can be applied and accommodated in laws and regulations. The main idea of the result of this study is the findings regarding the limits of meaningful participation in the formation of laws, that is the provision of opinions and inputs carried out by parties affected directly or indirectly and have concern to it. In addition, indicators for assessing the substance of participation and receiving opinions and inputs are “the purpose” of the regulation that will be formed. The participation media as well as participation explanations and answers are delivered conventionally and virtually with certain intelligence adjustments to the information technology used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.