Primary coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) deficiency is due to mutations in genes involved in CoQ biosynthesis. The disease has been associated with five major phenotypes, but a genotype–phenotype correlation is unclear. Here, we compare two mouse models with a genetic modification in Coq9 gene (Coq9Q95X and Coq9R239X), and their responses to 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (2,4-diHB). Coq9R239X mice manifest severe widespread CoQ deficiency associated with fatal encephalomyopathy and respond to 2,4-diHB increasing CoQ levels. In contrast, Coq9Q95X mice exhibit mild CoQ deficiency manifesting with reduction in CI+III activity and mitochondrial respiration in skeletal muscle, and late-onset mild mitochondrial myopathy, which does not respond to 2,4-diHB. We show that these differences are due to the levels of COQ biosynthetic proteins, suggesting that the presence of a truncated version of COQ9 protein in Coq9R239X mice destabilizes the CoQ multiprotein complex. Our study points out the importance of the multiprotein complex for CoQ biosynthesis in mammals, which may provide new insights to understand the genotype–phenotype heterogeneity associated with human CoQ deficiency and may have a potential impact on the treatment of this mitochondrial disorder.

We evaluated the effects of s 1 -receptor inhibition on m-opioidinduced mechanical antinociception and constipation. s 1 -Knockout mice exhibited marked mechanical antinociception in response to several m-opioid analgesics (fentanyl, oxycodone, morphine, buprenorphine, and tramadol) at systemic (subcutaneous) doses that were inactive in wild-type mice and even unmasked the antinociceptive effects of the peripheral m-opioid agonist loperamide. Likewise, systemic (subcutaneous) or local (intraplantar) treatment of wild-type mice with the selective A peripheral role for s 1 receptors was also supported by their higher density (Western blot results) in peripheral nervous tissue (dorsal root ganglia) than in several central areas involved in opioid antinociception (dorsal spinal cord, basolateral amygdala, periaqueductal gray, and rostroventral medulla). In contrast to its effects on nociception, s 1 -receptor inhibition did not alter fentanyl-or loperamide-induced constipation, a peripherally mediated nonanalgesic opioid effect. Therefore, s 1 -receptor inhibition may be used as a systemic or local adjuvant to enhance peripheral m-opioid analgesia without affecting opioidinduced constipation.

No abstract

Grip strength deficit is a measure of pain-induced functional disability in rheumatic disease. We tested whether this parameter and tactile allodynia, the standard pain measure in preclinical studies, show parallels in their response to analgesics and basic mechanisms. Mice with periarticular injections of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) in the ankles showed periarticular immune infiltration and synovial membrane alterations, together with pronounced grip strength deficits and tactile allodynia measured with von Frey hairs. However, inflammation-induced tactile allodynia lasted longer than grip strength alterations, and therefore did not drive the functional deficits. Oral administration of the opioid drugs oxycodone (1-8 mg/kg) and tramadol (10-80 mg/kg) induced a better recovery of grip strength than acetaminophen (40-320 mg/kg) or the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs ibuprofen (10-80 mg/kg) or celecoxib (40-160 mg/kg); these results are consistent with their analgesic efficacy in humans. Functional impairment was generally a more sensitive indicator of drug-induced analgesia than tactile allodynia, as drug doses that attenuated grip strength deficits showed little or no effect on von Frey thresholds. Finally, ruthenium red (a nonselective TRP antagonist) or the in vivo ablation of TRPV1-expressing neurons with resiniferatoxin abolished tactile allodynia without altering grip strength deficits, indicating that the neurobiology of tactile allodynia and grip strength deficits differ. In conclusion, grip strength deficits are due to a distinct type of pain that reflects an important aspect of the human pain experience, and therefore merits further exploration in preclinical studies to improve the translation of new analgesics from bench to bedside.

σ1 receptors play a major role in inflammatory hyperalgesia. Targeting σ1 receptors in the inflamed tissue may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory pain.

Sigma-1 antagonism potentiates the antinociceptive effects of opioid drugs, so sigma-1 receptors constitute a biological brake to opioid drug-induced analgesia. The pathophysiological role of this process is unknown. We aimed to investigate whether sigma-1 antagonism reduces inflammatory pain through the disinhibition of the endogenous opioidergic system in mice. The selective sigma-1 antagonists BD-1063 and S1RA abolished mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in mice with carrageenan-induced acute (3 h) inflammation. Sigma-1-mediated antihyperalgesia was reversed by the opioid antagonists naloxone and naloxone methiodide (a peripherally restricted naloxone analog) and by local administration at the inflamed site of monoclonal antibody 3-E7, which recognizes the pan-opioid sequence TyrGly-Gly-Phe at the N terminus of most endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs). Neutrophils expressed pro-opiomelanocortin, the precursor of β-endorphin (a known EOP), and constituted the majority of the acute immune infiltrate. β-endorphin levels increased in the inflamed paw, and this increase and the antihyperalgesic effects of sigma-1 antagonism were abolished by reducing the neutrophil load with in vivo administration of an anti-Ly6G antibody. The opioid-dependent sigma-1 antihyperalgesic effects were preserved 5 d after carrageenan administration, where macrophages/monocytes were found to express pro-opiomelanocortin and to now constitute the majority of the immune infiltrate. These results suggest that immune cells harboring EOPs are needed for the antihyperalgesic effects of sigma-1 antagonism during inflammation. In conclusion, sigma-1 receptors curtail immune-driven peripheral opioid analgesia, and sigma-1 antagonism produces local opioid analgesia by enhancing the action of EOPs of immune origin, maximizing the analgesic potential of immune cells that naturally accumulate in painful inflamed areas.sigma-1 receptors | inflammatory pain | endogenous opioid peptides | immune cells

Morphine induces peripherally μ-opioid-mediated antinociception to heat but not to mechanical stimulation. Peripheral sigma-1 receptors tonically inhibit μ-opioid antinociception to mechanical stimuli, but it is unknown whether they modulate μ-opioid heat antinociception. We hypothesized that sigma-1 receptors might play a role in the modality-specific peripheral antinociceptive effects of morphine and other clinically relevant μ-opioid agonists. Mechanical nociception was assessed in mice with the paw pressure test (450 g), and heat nociception with the unilateral hot plate (55 °C) test. Local peripheral (intraplantar) administration of morphine, buprenorphine or oxycodone did not induce antinociception to mechanical stimulation but had dose-dependent antinociceptive effects on heat stimuli. Local sigma-1 antagonism unmasked peripheral antinociception by μ-opioid agonists to mechanical stimuli, but did not modify their effects on heat stimulation. TRPV1+ and IB4+ cells are segregated populations of small neurons in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and the density of sigma-1 receptors was higher in IB4+ cells than in the rest of small nociceptive neurons. The in vivo ablation of TRPV1-expressing neurons with resiniferatoxin did not alter IB4+ neurons in the DRG, mechanical nociception, or the effects of sigma-1 antagonism on local morphine antinociception in this type of stimulus. However, it impaired the responses to heat stimuli and the effect of local morphine on heat nociception. In conclusion, peripheral opioid antinociception to mechanical stimuli is limited by sigma-1 tonic inhibitory actions, whereas peripheral opioid antinociception to heat stimuli (produced in TRPV1-expressing neurons) is not. Therefore, sigma-1 receptors contribute to the modality-specific peripheral effects of opioid analgesics.

No abstract